Current overview of Microkeratomes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Current overview of Microkeratomes

Description:

Contact us for Microkeratomes, also advantages for Microkeratomes are Lower cost, Less inflammation, More efficient surgical flow – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Slides: 24
Provided by: jehaneyeclinic
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current overview of Microkeratomes


1
Current overview of Microkeratomes
  • Dr Kareeshma Wadia
  • DNB, FNN
  • Cataract, Cornea and Refractive Surgeon
  • Director- Jehan Eye Clinic, Mumbai

2
NO FINANCIAL INTERESTS
3
PRINCIPLE
  • High-precision oscillating-blade systems
  • Docks to a suction ring
  • Creates a lamellar corneal flap while the cornea
    is held under high pressure.

4
TYPICAL COMPONENTS OF A MODERN MICROKERATOME
SYSTEM
  • Console
  • Motor
  • Microkeratome head
  • Applanator lenses
  • Vacuum fixation
  • Flap stop ring , which limits the microkeratome
    head through the fixation ring
  • Foot switch

5
CONSOLE
6
MOTOR AND MICROKERATOME HEAD
  • Motor of keratome initiates
  • Forward movement of head
  • Oscillation of blade for the cut

7
MODALITIES OF MICROKERATOME PASS
  • Rotative/Pivoting flap creation
  • less space needed,
  • hinge placement variable
  • - flap is thick thin thick
  • due to the upward movement
  • of the suction ring during the cut
  • Hansatome, Carriazo

8
MODALITIES OF MICROKERATOME PASS
  • Linear flap creation
  • intraop visibility during flap creation,
  • planar flap profile
  • - fixed hinge position
  • Amadeus, SBK

9
TYPE OF HEAD- Vertical / horizontal
10
SUCTION RING
  • Suction ring will induce rise in IOP
  • First step? choosing right size of suction ring
  • Suction ring diameter determines
  • How much of the cornea will protrude into the
    microkeratome
  • primary determinant of flap diameter.
  • Steep Cornea ? more tissue will protrude
  • Flat Cornea ? less tissue will protrude

11
ALWAYS FOLLOW NOMOGRAM
12
VACUUM SETTING
  • Achieving and maintaining adequate vacuum during
    microkeratome pass is critical to producing
    accurate flap.
  • IOP at least 65mmHg for most microkeratomes
  • Suction system and IOP should always be checked
    prior to every procedure
  • Lower pressures can produce thinner cuts and
    irregular flaps
  • Higher pressures can lead to chemosis, s/c
    hemorrhages, optic nerve injury

13
PLACING THE SUCTION RING
  • The LASIK pneumatic suction ring is placed on the
    eye.
  • With a suction pressure greater than 65 mm Hg,
    the instrument fixates the globe at the limbus
    and provides a dovetail track for the
    microkeratome.

14
THE NEED FOR TRANSIENT HIGH IOP
  • IOP gt65 mm Hg
  • Barraquer tonometer, a conical lens with a flat
    undersurface marked with a circle, and convex
    upper surface that acts as a magnifier.
  • Dry cornea
  • Gives uniform microkeratome section

15
MICROKERATOME PRACTICAL TIPS
  • Counsel well before taking the patient
  • Briefly explain the procedure -
  • That it will take 5-7minutes per eye
  • You will feel little pressure on eye
  • For few seconds you wont see the lights
  • Not to squeeze the eyes
  • Not to move the eyes
  • You will hear some noises of Keratome and the
    laser machine

16
MICROKERATOME PRACTICAL TIPS
  • Blade assembly and inspection
  • Check suction
  • Always do a trial pass before actual procedure
  • Listen to sound of blade oscillation

17
MICROKERATOME PRACTICAL TIPS
  • Always do marking on the cornea before keratome
    pass
  • Advantages of marking
  • Proper alignment of the flap post ablation
  • In case of free flap marking will help you to
    place the flap in its natural position
  • Also helps in identifying the epithelium and
    stromal side of free flap

18
ADVANTAGES OF MECHANICAL MICROKERATOMES
  • Proven history
  • Lower cost
  • More efficient surgical flow lt30 secs
  • Ability to create flaps in anterior stromal
    opacity/scar
  • Less inflammation

19
  • Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using
    the Moria microkeratome with the
  • One Use-Plus SBK,
  • M2 90
  • M2 110 head.

The SBK head demonstrated the most accurate flap
thickness, followed by the M2 90 head and the
110 head.
20
1- No difference in visual acuity 2- Dry eye
associated with MK and DLK with femto
21
  • Comparison between
  • Amadeus
  • Carriazo
  • Moria M2
  • SBK
  • Nidek
  • Hansatome
  • CONCLUSIONS
  • Variability between all 6 models
  • Device labelling did NOT represent flap thickness
    achieved
  • Thinner corneas had thinner flaps and similar for
    thicker corneas
  • 1st cut (1st eye) had a thicker flap in B/L
    procedures

22
More flap predictability in Femto
23
Thank you
  • Dr Kareeshma Wadia
  • jehaneyeclinic_at_gmail.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com