OCEAN Model vs HEXACO Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

OCEAN Model vs HEXACO Model

Description:

Foundation of Psychological Testing - big five personality trait short questionnaire (BFPTSQ) vs HEXACO-60 - similarities and differences - standardization: test norms, standardization groups - reliability: coefficient correlation - validity: content validity, criterion-related validity, construct validity – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Slides: 36
Provided by: rachelhch
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OCEAN Model vs HEXACO Model


1
OCEAN Model vs HEXACO ModelFoundation of
Psychological Testing
2
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Similarities
  • Differences
  • Standardization
  • Test Norms
  • Standardization Group
  • Reliability
  • Correlation Coefficient
  • Validity
  • Content Validity
  • Criterion-related Validity
  • Construct Validity
  • Conclusion

3
Introduction
  • Similarities
  • OCEAN Model and HEXACO Model are popular
    personality tests that consist of universal
    structure.
  • Their purpose is to evaluate the personality and
    the measure applied to examine behaviours or
    attitudes.
  • The four similar personality traits in these two
    models are Openness, Conscientiousness,
    Extraversion and Agreeableness.

4
Differences
  • OCEAN Model
  • It was developed in 1936.
  • Authors - Gordon Allport and Henry Odbert.
  • It has five factors.
  • The difference of the personality trait is
    Neuroticism.
  • This model has fifteen versions.

5
Fifteen OCEAN Model Versions
  • 100 Trait Descriptive Adjectives (TDA)
  • Big Five Mini Markers (BFMM)
  • 240-item NEO Personality Inventory, Revised
    (NEO-PI-R)
  • 60-item NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)
  • 50-item IPIP Measures
  • 20-item Mini International Personality Item Pool
    personality measure (Mini-IPIP)
  • Single Item Measures of Personality (SIMP)
  • 5-item Measure of the Big Five
  • Ten-Item Personality Measure (TIPI)
  • Five Factor Model Rating Form (FFMRF)
  • 44-item Big-Five Inventory (FBI)
  • Big Five Questionnaire-Children Version (BFQ-C)
  • Big Five Personality Trait Short Questionnaire
    (BFPTSQ)
  • 10-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10)
  • Big Five Inventory-Short form (BFI-S)

6
Differences
  • HEXACO Model
  • It was developed in the early 2000s.
  • Authors - Organisational Psychologist Kibeom Lee
    and Michael C. Ashton from Canada.
  • It has six factors.
  • The difference of the personality trait is
    Honesty-Humility and Emotional Stability.
  • Unlike OCEAN Model, this model has four versions.

7
Four HEXACO Model Versions
  • Brief HEXACO Inventory-24 (BHI)
  • HEXACO-60
  • HEXACO-100
  • HEXACO-SJT (Situational Judgement Test) Items-24

8
OCEAN Model Version - Big Five Personality Trait
Short Questionnaire (BFPTSQ) -
5-point Likert-type response format Totally
disagree 0 Disagree a little 1 Neutral
opinion 2 Agree a little 3 Totally agree 4
9
HEXACO Model Version HEXACO-60 5 strongly
agree 4 agree 3 neutral (neither agree nor
disagree) 2 disagree 1 strongly disagree
10
Standardization
01
11
Test Norms of BFPTSQ
  • BFPTSQ is a new short questionnaire
  • It is modified with the standard of BFI
  • Which is for adults,
  • Because its psychometric properties and content
    validity
  • They are adequate
  • The questionnaires of BFI
  • consist of short verbal statement questions
  • Easier to understand than single-trait adjectives
  • which would be difficult to translate precisely

12
Test Norms of BFPTSQ
  • BFPTSQ has 50 questions. Each question was
    simplified and reviewed for the language level of
    early adolescent
  • Adult questions from FBI were removed, and added
    questions that are relevant to essential primary
    personality traits
  • BFPTSQ can be finished around 10 to 15 minutes
  • These personality scales are correlated with
    three consequential outcomes psychopathology,
    substance use and Grade Point Average (GPA)

13
Test Norms of BFPTSQ
  • Psychopathology
  • the Youth Inventory Version 4 has seven scales
  • as self-report questions related to the symptoms
  • of the most popular mental disorder among
    adolescents in DSM-IV
  • Substance use
  • was examined with the adjusted questions
  • based on Quebec Adolescents Social and Personal
    Adjustment Measures
  • GPA scale
  • was measured by using grades
  • in the official final report cards from schools
  • with the passing mark of 60

14
Test Norms of BFPTSQ
  • To conduct the analyses, used
  • Mplus Version 6.12
  • Robust maximum likelihood estimator (MLR)
  • Confidence intervals (95) were used
  • in the calculation
  • for the precision of parameter estimates

15
Test Norms of HEXACO-60
  • HEXACO keeps much of the Big Five model, but
    redefines some of the personality characteristics
    and adds a sixth.
  • English and later developed in other languages
    like French, Filipino, German.
  • HEXACO contains 60 questions.
  • A ten-point measure that is adjusting from
    strongly disagree to strongly agree was
    utilized for whole personality measurements.
  • There is a strong correlation between HEXACO-60's
    six facet criteria with their counterpart in the
    Big Five Personality (BFP).

16
Test Norms of HEXACO-60
  • The HEXACO explains several benchmarks that
    relate to self-serving or anti-social behaviors,
    like academic and work-place failures.
  • Honesty-Humility can be considered as a critical
    predictor of values and socio-political
    perspectives.
  • Agreeableness in this inventory against Anger and
    Emotionality would demonstrate positively
    correlate with respectively Agreeableness and
    Neuroticism in Big Five.

17
Standardization Group of BFPTSQ
  • BFPTSQ was tested
  • 1,036 early adolescents
  • French Canadian
  • Equal gender
  • Between the age of 12 and 13
  • From eight French-language high school
  • In the province of Quebec in Canada
  • From a wide range of
  • Ethnic groups
  • Family backgrounds
  • Socioeconomic statuses

18
Standardization Group of HEXACO-60
  • Adult
  • College student communities
  • Equal gender
  • English language
  • Questionnaire demonstrated the desired and
    expected effects

19
Reliability
02
20
Correlation Coefficient of BFPTSQ
  • BFPTSQ scales show that all the estimates are
    acceptable in reliability
  • When the scales of BFI and BFPTSQ are compared by
    delta parameters
  • the new questions did not show any improvement
  • in reliability and negative impact
  • Since not many questions were added in each
    scale,
  • the reliability estimates is not expected to have
    a significant decrease,
  • because some of the new questions have slightly
    low factor loadings

21
Correlation Coefficient of BFPTSQ
  • When models include correlated uniquenesses, the
    latent variable model composite reliability
    estimates were consistently lower
  • The Cronbachs alpha coefficient will be
    traditionally accurate when the questions are
    one-dimensional, fundamentally tau-equivalent and
    the uniquenesses are not related
  • This result has proven that correlated
    uniquenesses that are not included will expand
    the reliability estimates of these personality
    trait scales

22
Correlation Coefficient of HEXACO-60
  • Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience
    scales in HEXACO-60 has strongly correlation with
    their NEO-FFI counterpart.
  • HEXACO-60 Emotionality and Agreeableness scale in
    HEXACO exhibited moderately, or relatively robust
    relations with NEO-FFI Neuroticism and
    Agreeableness, respectively.
  • HEXACO-60 Honesty-Humility was the only weak
    related to the NEO-FFI scales, which illustrated
    only modest or no substantial correlations even
    with NEO-FFI Agreeableness.

23
Correlation Coefficient of HEXACO-60
  • Cronbachs alpha estimated averaged in all
    languages and kinds of the HEXACO-personal
    inventory were moderately.
  • One of the main disadvantages of short
    personality inventory like HEXACO-60 in
    comparison to HEXACO-PI-R, is low reliability,
    especially in alpha reliability.
  • The researcher may solve this problem by
    selecting consistency over coverage, therefore
    increase the alpha reliability.

24
Validity
03
25
Content Validity of BFPTSQ
  • Six specialists in personality theory and
    construction with validation,
  • Antonio Terracciano, Brent Donnellan, Brent
    Roberts, Dave Miranda, Julie Pozzebon and Lewis
    Goldberg
  • rated the adequacy for all questions concerning
    to the Big Five scale
  • Overall, these questions are recognized as valid
    indicators
  • with the measure criteria of Content Validity
    Index
  • That means, the content validity is adequate for
    the BFPTSQ scales
  • Nevertheless, three new questions, were marked as
    slightly less adequate which is below criterion
    of .78
  • specifically Items 48 (Machiavellianism), 45 (Low
    Self-Worth), and 42 (Sensation Seeking)

26
Content Validity of HEXACO-60
  • Content validity refers to how much an assessment
    inventory is relevant to the target constructed,
    designed to measure.
  • It may be considered as a criterion-related
    validity of individual report estimates, probably
    less than optimum, and the reason is that they
    measure noncontectualized and personality facets.
  • In HEXACO-60 despite illustrating moderate to
    high construct validity levels, the BHI is
    associated with low internal consistency.

27
Criterion-related Validity of BFPTSQ
  • Correlations of BFPTSQ scales with three outcomes
    have adequate concurrent validity
  • Externalizing psychopathology scales have the
    highest levels of Extraversion
  • as expected in meta-analytic findings
  • except that the substance use was not in a
    prominently higher correlation
  • Conversely, internalizing psychopathology scales
    have the lowest level of Extraversion
  • Being the highest level of Extraversion, bipolar
    disorder is an exception although it is a mood
    disorder

28
Criterion-related Validity of BFPTSQ
  • The level of Openness is low,
  • and yet it is significantly related to
    psychopathology scales positively
  • as expected in the same findings
  • In BFPTSQ, Openness has negative connection with
    Conduct Disorder,
  • but positive connection with
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder
  • Major Depression Disorder
  • which are small in other correlations

29
Criterion-related Validity of BFPTSQ
  • Openness and Conscientiousness have positive
    connection with GPA as expected in meta-analysis
    findings
  • Agreeableness has a clear connection to GPA among
    these adolescents, which are notably stronger
    than in adult samples
  • The comparison tests between BFI scales and
    BFPTSQ scales proved that new questions offer
    several remarkably higher correlations with the
    outcome scales
  • With the confidence intervals, all slightly
    overlap

30
Criterion-related Validity of HEXACO-60
  • It was deduced that there is huge degree of
    content overlap between the sixth domain of the
    HEXACO, the Honesty-Humility, and the
    Agreeableness domain.
  • Criterion validity estimates how sufficiently one
    test indicates an output for one more measure.
  • Many studies and researchers have discovered that
    the HEXACO, particularly the Honesty-Humility
    aspect, has greater predictive validity than the
    Five Factor Model (FFM) across several variables.
  • The predictive validity of the HEXACO due to its
    inclusion of the Honesty-Humility domain has seen
    the HEXACO outperform the FFM fields in the
    foretelling of pretentiousness, immorality, and
    egoism.

31
Criterion-related Validity of HEXACO-60
  • The HEXACO as a better predictor of overt
    integrity measures.
  • Weller and Tikir (2010) found that
    Honesty-Humility was associated with tendency for
    ethical and safety risk-taking.
  • These outcomes indicate that the HEXACO is
    appearing as an increasingly widespread and
    popular instrument between applied psychologists
    and also there is obvious proof of its
    accumulative validity over the FFM in fields of
    relevant to personnel selection procedures.

32
Construct Validity of BFPTSQ
  • The questionnaire of NEO-PI-3 scales has a gold
    standard for convergent validity
  • It was compared with BFPTSQ scales by using
    statistical tests
  • For convergent validity, every correlation
    indicates that the BFPTSQ scales are adequate.
  • These scales are notably improved convergent
    validity based on the delta parameters
  • Certainly, every correlation between the broad
    scales of the Big Five trait are notably higher
  • Additionally, other several correlations with
    NEO-PI-3 primary-trait scales were considerably
    expanded as expected
  • It is because every primary trait has a similar
    variance related to the broad trait of Big Five
  • Nevertheless, every correlation pairs in the
    confidence intervals slightly overlap

33
Construct Validity HEXACO -60
  • HEXACO characteristics have been established in
    order approximately coordinate and revolved
    several of Big Five Emotional Stability and
    Agreeableness.
  • For Emotionality and Agreeableness seem there is
    a low convergent correlations.
  • They as well discovered low convergence between
    Emotionality and Agreeableness as estimated with
    HEXACO-60.

34
Conclusion
  • The HEXACO model is more or less similar to
    OCEAN models except it adds Honesty.
  • There are some small differences between this two
    models like, Humility, which makes it a little
    more reliable and valid Agreeableness.
  • The HEXACO model has a weaker connection with
    attitude than its counterpart in OCEAN Model on
    the other hand, there are no differences in its
    relationship with behaviors.
  • The Openness in the HEXACO has a more substantial
    connection or association with behavior.
  • Both of these two personality models are among
    the more reliable and valid psychological
    self-report tests.

35
Thanks!
  • Any Questions?
  • Credits
  • Presentation template from Slidego
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com