Test Automation vs Manual Testing

1
Test Automation vs Manual Testing

• In the software testing arena a perennial debate
  has raged between proponents of Test Automation
  vs Manual Testing. In our experience, the two are
  complementary used together they form a more
  effective test strategy.
• e

2
Automation testing

• Since the 1990s automation testing has risen as
  strong alternative. In automation testing a
  software tool is programmed ( In Java for
  example) to carry out human actions that testers
  would do in check based testing. The process is
  typically to first create the test cases like in
  Manual check based testing and then to program
  the test cases.

3
Why Choose Manual or Automation?

• Clearly manual and automation testing are great
  complements to each other and as a combination
  can create a fast, less brittle solution that has
  exploratory testing in addition.
• WebomateS offers a regression testing service
  that uses manual testing, automation and
  crowdsourcing together to guarantee all test
  cases(even modified ones) are executed in ONE day
  with exploratory testing! In fact the output is a
  list of prioritized defects for software teams to
  review and fix.
• With Webomates CQ we have developed a service
  that incorporates the benefits of AI into a TAAS
  ( Testing As a Service). To hear more about
  WebomatesCQ schedule a demo here.

4
With Webomates CQ we have developed a service
that incorporates the benefits of AI into a TAAS
( Testing As a Service). To hear more about
WebomatesCQ schedule a demo here.   SeleniumTesti
ngAutomation TestingAutomation Apitesting
USA AutomationTesting RegressionTesting
Softwaretesting Explore more at 
  https//www.webomates.com/For More
Information https//www.webomates.com/blog/autom
ation-testing/manual-versus-automation-testing/