Some important pointers in patient compliance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Some important pointers in patient compliance

Description:

Here are some pointers to begin helping the concern associated with compliance right now. Keeping in mind quality specifications specified by regulatory organizations, pcd pharma in Ahmedabad are specialists in hygienically processed. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:0
Slides: 10
Provided by: medicuspharma
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Some important pointers in patient compliance


1
How To Ease Compliance Burden On Pharma Industry?
2
  • The PCD Pharma business has a sufficient scope,
    and it is an outstanding business opportunity
    that ensures your company will expand and
    generate more money. Here are some pointers to
    begin alleviating the worry associated with
    compliance right now.

3
1. Prioritize The Health Of Patients And The
Quality Of Goods
  • The fundamental objective of validation is to
    guarantee that the application or system performs
    in the manner it was designed for its end users.
    Does it perform the way you claim it will in the
    future? Is it successful in doing what it set out
    to do? However, the pressure that regulated
    organizations feel to gather copious amounts of
    paperwork as proof for auditors too frequently
    causes this objective to take a secondary role,
    or perhaps to be forgotten entirely. Computer
    Systems Validation (CSV) clearly indicates where
    the focus should go on usability and product
    quality, not on heaps of screenshots from various
    aspects of the system.

4
2. Adapt The Validation Process To The Level Of
Patient Risk
  • When it comes to the potential influence that
    they might have on the safety of a user or
    patient, not all systems are created equal. CSA
    demands less stringent testing and documentation
    for systems that have indirect or no risk, but
    more stringent testing and documentation for
    systems where a failure or defect constitutes
    direct danger.
  • For instance, a labelling system would need more
    testing and documentation since a mistake in the
    system may lead to the incorrect use of a
    medicine, which would put the safety of the user
    in jeopardy. In addition, a system that was
    developed for the purpose of handling customer
    complaints has an indirect impact on the safety
    of patients and would thus need less stringent
    testing.

5
3. Adjust The Proportion Of Your Testing To Your
Documentation
  • In point of fact, you may have to do it
    backwards. According to the Food and Drug
    Administration (FDA), regulated corporations
    commit just 20 percent of their validation
    efforts to testing, while spending up to 80
    percent of their time documenting their
    processes. The CSA argues in favor of the
    counterbalanced approach and provides direction
    on how to implement it.

6
4. Utilizing Pre-Validation Work
  • Utilizing pre-validation work that has already
    been accomplished, whether it was done internally
    by your company or by your suppliers, may cut
    down on the length of your trip toward compliance
    and make it much simpler. It is not necessary to
    retest the system in its entirety every time
    there is a modification made to it.
  • However, if you are going to depend on validation
    that was carried out by a supplier, you need to
    make sure that the supplier is qualifiedmaybe
    even auditedand that you have a Quality
    Agreement in place.

7
5. Automate As Much As You Possibly Can
  • The automation of your assurance operations is
    the single most efficient technique to simplify
    your compliance process. You will have more
    flexibility to focus on product quality as a
    result of the time, effort, and money that you
    save.It is important to keep in mind that the
    makers of certain automated testing and lifecycle
    technologies will have previously tested such
    products.

8
6. Foster An Environment That Encourages Critical
Thinking
  • The inclusion of critical thinking to the
    validation process is one of the most significant
    differences between CSA and CSV, as well as an
    essential component of CSA's overarching aim. The
    CSA stresses that there is no one "correct"
    approach to carry out any given task. A culture
    of critical thinking will be the springboard to
    quicker delivery of more inventive and more
    dependable products. This culture will be
    supported by time-saving automated technologies
    that will save money, and an approach to
    validation that is targeted and risk-based.
  • Keeping in mind quality specifications specified
    by regulatory organizations, pcd pharma in
    Ahmedabad are specialists hygienically processed
    the supplied assortment of medications by
    employing quality tested chemical compounds and
    contemporary equipment under the guidance of
    quality auditors.

9
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com