Why are security audits for smart contracts necessary? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Why are security audits for smart contracts necessary?

Description:

Smart contract security audits can assist you in identifying any system vulnerabilities. It gives you the chance to correct these problems before someone wishing you harm does so and undoes what you have accomplished. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:7
Slides: 7
Provided by: cyphershield2022
Category: Other
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why are security audits for smart contracts necessary?


1
Why are smart contract security audits required?
2
Why are security audits for smart contracts
necessary?
  • Smart contract security audits can assist you in
    identifying any system vulnerabilities. It gives
    you the chance to correct these problems before
    someone wishing you harm does so and undoes what
    you have accomplished.
  • With this new technology, though, it's possible
    that you're not clear what a smart contract audit
    is, why one is important, or whether you truly
    need one. Check out a few intriguing smartphone
    ideas for the near future.
  • What is smart contract auditing?
  • A "Smart Contract Audit" is a thorough and
    methodical examination of the code that a smart
    contract employs to interact with a
    cryptocurrency or blockchain. Finding defects,
    technical problems, and security flaws in the
    code is done using this technique. It enables
    experts in smart contract security audit to offer
    changes. Smart contract audits are frequently
    required since the majority of smart contracts
    deal with priceless commodities and financial
    assets.
  • Smart contract audits cannot absolutely guarantee
    that the contract is free of defects or errors.
    It does, however, guarantee that the smart
    contract is safe following a technical expert's
    review.

3
Cyber-attacks on Blockchain networks and smart
contracts
  • Before they be used in actual attacks,
    vulnerabilities in the blockchain must be found
    and fixed by developers.
  • The two fundamental tactics that hostile
    organisations utilise to carry out effective
    assaults are bait and response attacks. A
    complete grasp of Blockchain network smart
    contracts and related components, such as
    cross-chain and side-chain wallets, as well as
    familiarity with numerous protocols are required
    for the second, more complicated technique. The
    first tactic makes use of deceptive social
    engineering techniques, such persuading the
    victim to transmit cryptocurrency to the
    attacker.
  • Because they handle or exchange substantial
    amounts of money, smart contracts become
    attractive targets for malicious cyber assaults.
    Significant sums of money can be stolen through
    simple programming flaws.
  • Three prominent Blockchain assaults are listed
    below.

4
Wormhole Bridge
  • The Wormhole Bridge breach is now the
    second-largest attack against the cryptocurrency
    sector. Wormhole, a well-known link between the
    Ethereum and Solana chains, lost almost 320
    million as a result of the attack. Utilizing a
    bridge flaw, the attacker took 120,323 Ether, or
    XNUMX million dollars.
  • The attacker created about 20,000 hours' worth of
    Ethereum on the Solana Blockchain, which was
    valued 325 million at the time of the hack. He
    did it by pretending to be a genuine signer on a
    deal without offering any guarantees.
  • Finance CREAM
  • The hacker took advantage of a flaw in Cream
    Finance's flash loan agreement to get Ethereum
    tokens valued about 130 million. Oracle Cream's
    methodology and technology for determining asset
    values have serious flaws.

5
  • Using the CREAM Finance platform's smart
    contracts' restrictions on price computation, the
    attacker changed the price of the pool of yUSD
    used as collateral, changing the 1 yUSD wager
    into 2.
  • As a result, Cream Finance reports that the
    attacker's initial 1.5 million yUSD investment
    has increased by twofold. The hacker then
    leveraged a XNUMX billion profit to drain the
    project's overall liquidity by converting his
    yUSD investment at Cream Finance into 3 billion.
  • Reverse Finance
  • First, the attacker removed 901 ETH from Tornado
    Cash, the Ether Mixer. The attacker then used
    SushiSwap's liquidity pools for INV/WETH and
    INV/DOLA to convert them to INV. Both
    organisations utilised the price of Oracal
    Keep3r, which tracked the cost of INV, to
    increase the cost of INV. As a consequence, the
    value of Inverse Finance's INV increased, making
    it possible for the attacker to get a 15.6
    million INV-backed loan in ETH, WBTC, YFI, and
    DOLA.

6
  • Security evaluations of smart contracts are
    necessary for both DeFi and NFT
  • As examples, a number of well-known projects that
    had financial disasters were used to highlight
    the pressing need for a comprehensive audit of
    smart contracts. Even if you carry out a smart
    contract audit, there is no guarantee that the
    smart contract will always be immune to attack.
    You can now see how NFT tokens operate to stop
    art theft the best manner possible.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com