Top 5 Notable Insolvency Cases in the United Kingdom - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Top 5 Notable Insolvency Cases in the United Kingdom

Description:

There are some insolvency cases that, due to the nature of the insolvent company, or the complexity of the case, become notable in history. The benefit of notable insolvency cases is that future insolvency practitioners (IPs) have the opportunity to learn from them. So, let’s take a look at the top 5 notable insolvency cases every insolvency professional should know about. Eurosail bought a portfolio of sub-prime mortgages which were funded by loan notes of various currencies and classes. Eurosail entered into a variety of currency swaps with the Lehman Brothers Group, which protected Eurosail from exchange rate fluctuations. Should there be a default on the notes, including Eurosail’s ability to pay its debts, they become due for payment. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:0
Date added: 30 August 2024
Slides: 5
Provided by: leadingUnitedKingdom
Category: Other
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Top 5 Notable Insolvency Cases in the United Kingdom


1
Call us today! 01603 552028 mail_at_leading.uk.com
Home
Who We Are
What We Do
News
Resources
Get Quote
CONTACT
Top 5 Notable Insolvency Cases in the United
Kingdom
There are some insolvency cases that, due to the
nature of the insolvent company, or the
complexity of the case, become notable in
history. The benefit of notable insolvency cases
is that future insolvency practitioners (IPs)
have the opportunity to learn from them. So,
lets take a look at the top 5 notable insolvency
cases every insolvency professional should know
about.
1. Eurosail
2
Eurosail bought a portfolio of sub-prime
mortgages which were funded by loan notes of
various currencies and classes. Eurosail entered
into a variety of currency swaps with the Lehman
Brothers Group, which protected Eurosail from
exchange rate fluctuations. Should there be a
default on the notes, including Eurosails
ability to pay its debts, they become due for
payment. When the Lehman Brothers Group
collapsed, Eurosails currency protection also
collapsed and left them with a claim in the
following Lehmans insolvency procedure. Together
with the subsequent negativity of interest and
currency rates, it meant that Eurosails audited
accounts showed that their liabilities were far
higher than their assets. But Eurosail was able
to pay interest on the notes as well as repay the
principal on the basis that funds were
available. Subsequently, a group of subordinated
noteholders started proceedings on whether they
were able to declare an event of default the
argument being that if Eurosail were allowed to
pay interest on the notes and principal on the
funds that ranked higher, there would be a
shortfall in funds. However, should an event
default be declared, their position would be
better as they are then ranked pari passu with
the noteholders. Ultimately, the Supreme Court,
which upheld the Court of Appeals decision, held
that The statutory test for a company unable to
pay its debts is materially different from the
position under the Companies Act 2006. The
balance sheet test requires a court to be
satisfied that, on the balance of probabilities,
the company has insufficient assets to meet all
its liabilities, including prospective and
contingent liabilities. The more distant
liabilities, the harder this will be to
establish. There is no need to have recourse to
the concept of the point of no return as
alluded to in the Court of Appeal judgement, and
the expression should not pass into common usage
as a paraphrase of Section 123(2).
2. Nortel
  • Nortel and the Lehman Brothers Group case deals
    with the underfunding of each groups pension
    scheme, with the real possibility that each
    company could become the subject of a financial
    support
  • direction and, therefore, a contribution notice
    under the Pensions Act 2004. According to the
    law, the Pensions Regulator can impose liability
    for a pension scheme debt on a company with a
    defined benefit scheme.
  • A creditor can prove in the administration or
    liquidation of a company they are owed a debt.
    The debt in this context includes
  • A liability to which the company is subject when
    it goes into administration or liquidation (rule
    13.12(1)(a) Insolvency Rules 1986).
  • A liability that arises from an obligation to
    which the company was subject when it entered
    administration or liquidation (rule 13.12(1)(b)).
  • The Supreme Court held that the financial support
    direction liabilities were provable debts in the
    administration of the companies under rule
    13.12(1)(b) of the Insolvency Rules 1986. It held
    that the companies were under an obligation to
    make a payment to the Pensions Regulator pursuant
    to the statutory scheme even though they were not
    subject to an FSD when they entered
    administration.
  • 3. McDonagh and Pengelly
  • Employees claimed against the National Insurance
    fund for arrears of pay as well as unpaid holiday
    pay. However, their claim was refused on the
    basis that there was no entitlement. This was due
    to the fact that the company was already
    insolvent as it had entered into a CVA, which
    wasnt known by the employees. Insolvency law and
    Section 182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
    says that the Secretary of State should make
    payment from the National Insurance fund if
  • The employees employer has become insolvent.
  • The employees employment has been terminated.
  • On the appropriate date, the employee was
    entitled to be paid, the whole or part of any
    debt to which this part applies.
  • Although the employees claims were upheld by two
    employment tribunals, the Secretary of State
    appealed the decisions. Ultimately, the
    Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) held that the
    employees of companies that had entered into a
    CVA were not entitled to payments from the
    National Insurance fund when the company then
    went into liquidation. The reason being that
    legislation, such as
  • employee claims, can only be applied to one
    insolvency event and the single date is the date
    the company entered the court-approved CVA, not
    the subsequent liquidation.
  • Ethel Austin and Woolworths

3
and obviously needed to enter an insolvency
procedure, the court wasnt able to make an
administration order.
So these were the top 5 Notable Insolvency Cases
in the United Kingdom. If you are struggling with
corporate or personal debt and unsure what the
right route is to deal with your creditors, the
first step is to seek professional advice. Our
highly experienced professionals at Leading are
on hand to help with advice on managing personal
and professional insolvency matters. Contact us
today and discover how we can help you.
By Viv1 July 18th, 2022 Industry News
Comments Off
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
Related Posts
UK Insolvencies Unravelling Economic Realities
Amid Soaring Figures April 29th, 2024
Uncovering Fraudulent Activities Understanding
Fraud Under the Insolvency Act 1986 October 23rd,
2023
Case Study Wilko to Close Majority of Stores
with Loss of Thousands of Jobs September 28th,
2023
4
HELPING CLIENTS ACROSS THE UK
OFFICES
For Business Rescue and Insolvency ... Call Today!
Norwich Borehamwoood
CONTACT
MEMBER OF
Contact us Sitemap
Copyright 2024 Leading Business Services Ltd.
All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Privacy
Cookie
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com