PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY OF SCIENCE 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY OF SCIENCE 2

Description:

Epistemology stems from the Greek 'episteme' (knowledge), and 'logos' (theory) ... Epistemology is the systematic and detailed study of knowledge, its criteria of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: vincentfh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY OF SCIENCE 2


1
PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY OF SCIENCE(2)
  • Vincent F. Hendricks
  • Department of Philosophy and Science Studies
  • Roskilde University
  • vincent_at_ruc.dk
  • Thursday, February 19 / 2004

2
PHILOSOPHY / Knowledge
  • Epistemology stems from the Greek episteme
    (knowledge), and logos (theory)
  • The discipline is located between ontology
    (metaphysics) and methodology
  • Ontology Epistemology
    Methodology
  • being knowledge / truth
    reliability
  • Epistemology is the systematic and detailed study
    of knowledge, its criteria of acquistion, its
    limits and modes of justification
  • Knowledge may be of the following kinds
  • knowledge of how (procedural, skill, ability
    ...), p. 39
  • knowledge by aquaintance (who, where, when ...),
    p. 39
  • propositional knowledge (knowledge of p for
    arbitrary proposition p), p. 40
  • What conditions should then be met for S knows
    that p to be satisfied for some agent S?

3
PHILOSOPHY / Knowledge
  • Implicitly in the work of Plato, Kant, and
    recently explicitly formulated by C.I. Lewis
    knowledge is characterized by three, individually
    necessary, and jointly sufficient ingredients
  • belief
  • truth
  • justification
  • These ingrdients in proper conjunction give rise
    to the standard tripartite definition of
    knowledge as justified true belief (JTB)
  • S knows that p if and only if
  • S believes p (the belief condition)
  • p is true (the factual truth condition)
  • S is justified in believing p
  • Note the way in which the necessity and
    sufficiency connective if and only if works
  • If S knows that p, then conditions 1, 2, 3 must
    be satisfied
  • If conditions 1, 2, 3, are satisfied, then S
    knows that p
  • The JTB-definition of knowledge is the standard
    one in philosophy

4
PHILOSOPHY / Knowledge - Belief
  • Belief is typically considered a to being
  • a psychological primitive or dispositional
    psychological state
  • exisiting independently of manifestation
  • connecting the agent S to what is eventually
    known
  • A belief may however be
  • false and fallible
  • obtained by luck, guesswork, randomness ...
  • unstable, insecure, and revisable in the light of
    conflicting evidence
  • subjective rather than objective
  • ...
  • Knowledge should (is) none of the above, thus
    belief alone, albeit necessary is insufficient
    for knowledge knowledge is be infallible
  • Belief has not raised any serious eyebrows as an
    ingredient of knowledge, although it may be hard
    to specify exactly what belief amounts to
    (philosophy of mind)

5
PHILOSOPHY / Knowledge - Truth
  • Humans are free to believe something which is in
    fact, but knowledge is not such a lenient
    committment
  • Knowledge of p entails the truth of p
  • The notion of truth is one of the most discussed
    in philosophy
  • absolutistic truth
  • relativistic truth
  • theories or criteria of truth p. 43
  • correspondence theory of truth A proposition p
    is true if it in some adequate sense corresponds
    with reality
  • coherence theory of truth A proposition p is
    true if it in some adequate sense is coherent
    with other propositions believed
  • pragmatic theory of truth A proposition p is
    true if it in some adequate sense works or is
    useful
  • redundancy theory of truth A proposition p is
    true is to say p
  • ...
  • Albeit hard to specify there is consensus to the
    effect that some notion of correctness must be
    in place if the notion of knowledge is to
    survive, although this notion of correctness may
    fall short of truth

6
PHILOSOPHY / Knowledge - Jusitifcation
  • Although humans are free to believe something
    false, they may also strike upon the truth from
    time to time, and thus believe something true
  • True belief may however be the result of blind
    luck, random guesswork, clairvoyance, evidence
    collected under obscure circumstances ...
  • The qualify as knowledge not only must the belief
    be rendered true but it must be held true in some
    justified or robust way
  • To secure knowledge some argument must be
    presented as to why the belief and the truth
    conditions are adequately connected
  • Only furnished with such supportive reasons of
    adequacy or justification together with the two
    other conditions may the agent be said to have
    the necessary and sufficient testimony required
    for knowledge
  • Of the conditions discussed, the justification
    condition has been in the eye of the tornado

7
PHILOSOPHY / Knowledge - Justification
  • Lenzen recently noted Because of the vagueness
    of such notions as having sufficient reasons for
    believing, being justified in believing it is
    difficult to make a decision concerning the
    adequacy ... that knowledge implies
    justification
  • Justification has proved hard to define, and the
    rest of chapter 2 is an attempt to flesh out this
    notion of justification and acquistion of
    knowledge in terms of
  • Reasoning, logic and proof
  • deduction and validity An argument is valid if
    it is impossible that the premisses are true but
    the conclusion false
  • laws of thought / examples laws of identity,
    non-contradiction, excluded middle ...
  • induction and inference to best explanation
  • other engines of inference ...
  • Experience
  • sense-perception, introspection
  • feeling that / faith
  • memory
  • ... all of which may be fallible, and thus
    undercutting the reasons and the infallibility of
    knowledge

8
PHILOSOPHY / Knowledge - Justification
  • In 1963 a short paper appeared (3 pages) in the
    philosophical journal Analysis by Edmund Gettier
    which rocked the world of epistemology
  • Gettier was able to show, using simple logical
    tools, that the JTB account of knowledge is
    flawed
  • It is possible to have justified true belief but
    still lack knowledge
  • Gettier presented two cases
  • Jones owns a Ford / logical tool the rule of
    introduction for the logical connective or
  • Getting the job and having 10 in your pocket /
    logical tool the rule of introduction for the
    logical connective there exists, and a
    principle of substitution
  • The point about the examples is that the agent
    may get it right for the wrong reasons which
    undercuts the condition of justification
  • Nobody suggested abandoning logical principles
    for getting out of the fix
  • So much work in epistemology since Gettier has
    gone into remedying the justification condition
    to block the Gettier cases
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com