Podopaediatrics Group South Wales - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Podopaediatrics Group South Wales

Description:

Utilizes research on normal COP curves. Indications 2 Arch ... Reduces rear foot eversion. Indications Flexible Paed flat foot. Can be modified/additions added ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: mertecpref2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Podopaediatrics Group South Wales


1
RS Scan junior
Application Mild/Moderate/ pronation
Description EVA med density 3/4
shell. Deep heel
cup.No forefoot post.
2-3 mm Kirby skive.
Theory Kirby STjt axis theory.
Utilizes research
on normal COP curves
Indications 2 Arch heights. N or F
Flexible Paed flat
foot. Mild
Cavoid foot
Contra- Narrow heel
cup Indications
Availability RS Scan.Size 8-13.
Adult 1-13
2
Interpod Juniors / Peapods
Interpod soft
Interpod Flex
3
Interpod Juniors/Peapods
Application Mild/Moderate/ severe
pronation
Description Soft density shell .
Full length or 3/4
Flex shell 3/4 length.
4,6or 8.
  • Theory Utilizes medial wedge
  • Facilitates
    Windlass mechanism

Indications Paediatric flexible flat
foot Heel
/Plantar fascia pain
Contra- Inadequate depth in
footwear Indications
Availability Order from Algeos.
Sizes child 9/27 up to
adult 11/12
4
Junior F.I.M.S.
5
Junior F.I.M.S.
Application Mild / Moderate/ pronation
  • Description EVA med /high density 3/4
    shell.
  • 0,3 or 5 medial
    rear foot post.
  • Deep heel cup.
    Thin walls.
  • Red Right. Blue
    Left.

Theory Heel Cup Theory
Indications Asymmetric conditions
Flexible paediatric
flat foot
Contra- Wide heels Indications
Availability Sizes19/20 to 33/34.
Order from Cannonbury
Healthcare.
6
Junior Formthotics
7
Junior Formthotics
Application Mild/Moderate/
pronation
Description EVA Med density 3/4
shell
Intrinsic 6-8mm Kirby skive
Deep heel cup.Wide medial flange
  • Theory Increased force
    medial to STjt.
  • Reduces rear
    foot eversion.

Indications Flexible Paed flat
foot Can be
modified/additions added
  • Contra-Indications Narrow heel
  • Heavy child
  • Availability To order from Mobilis.
  • Size J1(8-9.5)
    to J4 (1-2)

8
Talar made Orthotics.
Pro - Step
9
Pro - Step
Application Mild / Moderate/ pronation
Description Full length or 3/4 device
Med/high density
EVA. Integrated
0,3,5 posts to rear forefoot
Theory Medial Kirby skive
  • Indications Paediatric Flexible Flat
    foot.
  • Asymmetry

Contra- Medial heel
irritation. Indications
Availability Order from Talar -Made
Child size 13 - adult
12
10
Talar Made Orthotics
Gaitway
11
Gaitway
Application Mild pronation
Description 3/4 length Med density EVA
Deep heel
cup.Integrated 3 post.
Extrinsic posting system 0 or 3 forefoot
  • Theory Medial post imposes
    supinatory moment
  • No forefoot post
  • Indications Mild-moderate paediatic
    flex flat foot

Contra- Heavy child. Indications
Availability Talar made.Child 11-adult
11. Gaitway
slimline available for narrow
petite foot.
12
GOLDEN RULE
  • It is the responsibility of the clinician to
  • 1. To recognise allow for normal development.
  • 2.Whilst differentiating between self-limiting
    developmental conditions and significant
    persistent abnormalities.

13
ORTHOSES-The Debate
  • No high level evidence that orthoses improve
    function or reduce pain.(Whitford et al ,2007)
  • Excessive pronation in a flexible foot causes
    failure of normal biomechanics leading to pain
    and dysfunction.(Blake1991,Franco 1987,Pratt1995
    etc.)
  • Subotnick(1989) states that 80-85 of the overuse
    injuries of the lower extremity respond to
    biomechanical foot control.

14
THE DEBATE
  • Whitford et al(2007) found no evidence to justify
    the use of in-shoe orthoses in the management of
    flexible excess foot pronation in
    children.(7-11.)
  • Coombs(1996 unpublished M.Sc.)found excessive
    sub-talar joint movement inc. postural pain.90
    subject study across 3 age groups(10-30,31-50,51-7
    0.)

15
THE DEBATE
  • Orthoses have been demonstrated to have a
    positive effect on MSK conditions (Redmond et al
    2004).
  • CASTED OR PRE-FAB ORTHOSES
  • -Whitford et al(2007) demonstrated little
    difference in outcome measures.
  • -Redmond et al(2004) demonstrated comparable
    mechanical properties in contoured pre-fab to
    custom casted.

16
SUMMARY-DO NO HARM
  • What children seem to require , following a
    biomechanical examination, is not always what
    they are able to tolerate, or find the most
    beneficial.
  • The influence an orthotic device will have on the
    child's foot and symptoms it is prescribed for
    will not be known until it is fitted and then
    worn.
  • Orthotic therapy in children should be regarded
    as an ongoing treatment with the need for
    continual review with appropriate modifications
    where necessary.

17
(No Transcript)
18
A little support may help?
19
SUMMARY
20
Thank you.
21
  • THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com