Psychology%20and%20Investments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Psychology%20and%20Investments

Description:

For simplicity: preferences are described by relatively simple utility function ... this difference emerges most strongly on masculine tasks' Deaux &Farris, 1977 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: andreis4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Psychology%20and%20Investments


1
Psychology and Investments
  • Andrei Simonov

2
Introduction
  • Classical Finance is based on the notion of Homo
    Chicagoan
  • Rational
  • Do keep track of all available investment
    opportunities
  • Can process tons of information instantly
  • For simplicity preferences are described by
    relatively simple utility function
  • As amount of the gamble winning/loosing e cents
    (p1/2) decreases, sooner or later everyone plays

3
Overconfidence and Optimism (1)
  • Rule of thumbs I am 99 sure should be
    translated as I am 70-90 sure
  • Empirical Results people do overestimate the
    precision of their knowledge
  • Alpert Raiffa 82
  • Stael von Holstein 1972 inv. bankers
  • Cooper et. al. 88 - enterpreneurs

4
Overconfidence and Optimism (2)
  • People overestimate their ability to deal with
    task. The more important the task is the greater
    is the optimism (Frank 35)
  • 82 of students are in top 30 of their class
    (Svenson)
  • 81 of 2994 new business owners are sure that
    their firm has 70 or better chances of survival.
    Only 39 thought that the business like theirs
    has similar chances (Cooper).

BAD GOOD
5
Overconfidence and Individual Investors Barber
Odean (1)
  • Individual Investors Behavior
  • H1 Overconfident investors buy transactions
    should underperform
  • H2 Overconfident investors sell transactions
    should overperform
  • Transaction cost for round-trip ?6 ?buys
    should overperform sells by 6
  • Result of BarberOdean
  • 4mo rBUY-rSELL ?-2.5
  • 1 yr rBUY-rSELL ?-5.1
  • 2 yr rBUY-rSELL ?-8.6

6
Overconfidence and Individual Investors Barber
Odean (2)
  • Turnover
  • The more investors trade the more they reduce
    their return.
  • Partitioning investors into quintiles
  • Quitile that trades unfrequently underperform
    bu-and-hold strategy for 0.25 annually.
  • Active traders underperformed 7.04
  • Gender Boys will be boys
  • Overall, men claim more ability than do women,
    but this difference emerges most strongly on
    masculine tasks Deaux Farris, 1977
  • BarberOdean Men traded 45 more actively. The
    difference between returns of men and women is
    0.94

7
Overconfidence and Individual Investors (3)
  • Goetzmann Peles 1997
  • AAII members(informed investors) survey
  • On average investors overestimate the performance
    of their mutual funds by 3.4
  • If investors have control over choosing the fund,
    their estimate exceed the real number by 8.6
    (vs. 2.4 for defined contributions plans)
  • ?Illusion of control matters. Internet and online
    access provides that kind of illusion
  • Barber and Odean Fast dies first Investors who
    switch to online trading underperform more than
    before
  • Metrick (NBER2000) Thades done through online
    channel are unambiguously less profitable

8
Overconfidence what to do?
  • New year resolution list (Kaneman Riepe)
  • Always analyse worst case scenario, avoid focus
    on upside
  • Keep the list of past recommendation you made
    that did not work (Caesar, you are just a man...)
  • Serious stuff
  • Create sub-account in which investor trades
    (gambles) as he/she wish. Typical client invests
    5-7 of his portfolio himself with dismal
    results.
  • Give em more control. Clients are wanting more
    details, more paper and more technology (Hurley
    2000)
  • Education matters

9
Confirmation Bias
  • August 1987 saw a historically high valuation of
    dividends, beating out even that of 1929. The
    result was a 1,000 points crash
  • (Prechter,1997)
  • True, low DivY was followed by low returns in the
    following year 33 times in 1872-1999.
  • But Low DivY high Ret 31 years
  • High DivY low Ret 31 years
  • High DivY high Ret 33 years

10
Confirmation Bias(2)
  • Cure Statistical analysis.
  • 1year return no relation
  • 10yr annualized 10yr returns strong positive
    correlation
  • Ref. Due FisherStatman, JPM 2000

11
An Example
  • Initial endowment 300. Consider a choice
    between
  • a sure gain of 100
  • a 50 chance to gain 200, a 50 chance to gain
    0.
  • Initial endowment 500. Consider a choice
    between
  • a sure loss of 100
  • a 50 chance to lose 200, a 50 chance to lose
    0.

12
Reversal in Choice
  • Case 1 72 chose option 1, 28 chose option 2.
  • Case 2 36 chose option 1, 64 chose option 2.
  • gt A reversal in Choice
  • Problem framed as a gain decision maker is risk
    averse.
  • Problem framed as a loss decision maker is risk
    seeking.

13
Allais Paradox
  • Case 1 consider a choice between
  • 1 million with certainty.
  • 5 million with prob 0.1, 1m with prob 0.89 and
    0 with prob 0.01
  • Case 2 consider a choice between
  • 1m with prob 0.11, 0 with prob 0.89.
  • 5m with prob 0.10 and 0 with prob 0.90.

14
Allais Paradox Explanation
  • u(1m) gt 0.10u(5m) 0.89u(1m) 0.01u(0m)
  • Add 0.89u(0m) - 0.89u(1m) to both sides.
  • 0.11u(1m) 0.89u(0m) gt 0.10u(5m) 0.90u(0m)
  • Violates Expected Utility Theorem!

15
Prospect Theory
  • Proposed by two psychologists Daniel Kahneman
    and Amos Tversky.
  • Gambles are evaluated relative to a reference
    point.
  • Decision maker analyzes gains and losses
    differently.
  • Incremental value of a loss is larger than that
    of a loss.
  • the hurt of a 1000 loss is more painful than
    the benefit of a 1000 gain.

16
Loss aversion and return patterns
  • Barberis et. al (99) money in the bank affects
    the level of risk aversion.
  • Investors who make money feel rich, they
    exhibit smaller loss aversion?.
  • Investors overinvest in stock market, further
    pushing the prices up
  • Equity premium is low
  • Investors who loose money exhibit higher risk
    aversion, move out of the market
  • Simple model of investor sentiment.

17
What to do ?
  • Investigate your clients loss aversion
  • Use derivative instruments (may be, custom-build)
  • Equity-linked structured notes
  • Equity-linked annuities
  • Protective puts on index
  • Opportunities for investment advisors one size
    does not fit all!

18
Disposition Effect, Regret Avoidance and Anchoring
  • Barber and Odean (again!)
  • Investors hold on loosers and sell winners
  • Anchoring
  • NASDAQ is down from its highs (No questions how
    reasonable high was)
  • P/E level in Japan in 90s is acceptable (w.r.t.
    anchoring level of 1980s)
  • Money illusion (counting nominal and not real
    money)
  • Stop orders might be useful, statistical analysis
    is important.

19
Framing
  • Benartzi Thaler (96)
  • When shown series of 30 one-year return, people
    allocate 40 to stocks and 60 to bonds.
  • When shown just cummulative 30 yr. return, the
    allocation was 9010...
  • Effect of framing for current market entrants.
  • Opportunity example covered calls
  • Framing one should use the broader possible
    frame. Role of education.

20
Mental Compartments
  • Hedging people hedge not against the risk of
    future cash flows but against the risk of a
    particular transaction
  • Usage of derivatives by firms
  • 50 hedged transactions lt1 yr. Into the future
  • 11 hedged transactions gt1 yr. Into the future
  • Long-term short-term investments compartment.
  • It is difficult to ask client to sell the
    security designated as long-term investment.
    Way out covered calls.

21
Role of Investor Behavior
  • Bounded Rationality satisficing behavior.
    Information processing limitations. Example
    memory limitations.
  • Investor Sentiment beliefs based on heuristics
    rather than Bayesian rationality.
  • Investors may react to irrelevant information
    and hence may trade on noise rather than
    information.

22
Behavioral Heuristics and Decision-Making Biases
  • What strategies do decision makers use when faced
    with difficult decisions, especially ones that
    involve uncertainty?
  • Commonly Used Heuristics
  • Availability familiarity breeds investment.
  • Representativeness judgment based on similarity.
    Patterns in random sequences.
  • Reliance on the judgment of other people (Keynes
    beauty contest analogy).

23
Gamblers Fallacy
  • Investors may apply law of large numbers to small
    sequences.
  • Example fair coin tossing.
  • THTHTHHHHHH -gt P(T) ?, P(H) ?.
  • Which of the 2 sequences is more likely to occur
    in a fair coin tossing experiment?
  • HHHHHHTTTTTTHHHHHH
  • HHTHTHHTHTTHTHHTTH

24
Fashions and Fads
  • People are influenced by each other. There is a
    social pressure to conform.
  • Herding behavior safety-in-numbers.
  • Informational Cascades
  • Positive Feedback
  • Example excessive demand for internet IPOs.
    Extremely high opening day returns.

25
Can arbitrage opportunities exist?
  • Yes!
  • Real-world arbitrage is always risky. No
    riskless hedge for the arbitrageur.
  • Arbitrageur facesnoise trader risk mispricing
    can become worse before it disappears.
  • Close substitutes (needed for arbitrage
    positions) may not be available.
  • Fundamentally identical assets may NOT sell at
    identical prices.

26
Behavioral Finance Two Major Foundations
  • Investor Sentiment creates disturbances to
    efficient prices.
  • Limited arbitrage arbitrage is never riskfree,
    hence it does not counter irrational
    disturbances.
  • Prices may not react to information by the
    right amount.
  • Prices may react to non-information.
  • Markets may remain efficient.

27
Example of Investor sentiment Rose.com
  • 63 companies that change the name from Widget to
    Widget.com/.net within Jan-Mar 98
  • 80 announcement effect
  • Renaming the company attracts investors with
    bullish sentiment towards internet stock.
  • Rule of thumbs thinking change of name
    change in strategy.
  • Reacting to non-information

28
Investor Sentiment, Bubbles and Crashes
  • Case Shiller(88)
  • Expectations about future house value
    appreciation is an increasing function of
    previous period appreciation.
  • Affects the decision to purchase the new house.
  • Frankel Froot
  • Long-term is overvalued w.r.t. Y, but short
    term it will go up.
  • Effect of magical thresholds (100Y1)
  • / is another good example.
  • Shiller (88) Investors sold in 87 because they
    believed that the market is going to decline
    further.
  • Bigger sucker theory.

29
Investor sentiment and funds flow
  • Goetzmann, Massa(99,Y2K)
  • behavioral factors can explain 45 in
    cross-sectional variation in mutual funds
    returns
  • Mf flow is by itself responsible for significant
    of the resent market run.
  • Those inflows are heavily affected by the opinion
    of experts and behavioral factors.

30
Irrational Behavior of Professional Money
Managers
  • May choose a portfolio very close to the
    benchmark against which they are evaluated (for
    example SP500 index).
  • Herding may select stocks that other managers
    select to avoid falling behind and looking
    bad.
  • Window-dressing add to the portfolio stocks that
    have done well in the recent past and sell stocks
    that have recently done poorly.

31
Summary
  • Investor behavior does have an impact on the
    behavior of financial markets. How much? Not
    clear!
  • Both social and psychological must be taken
    into account in explaining the behavior of agents
    in financial markets.
  • Market anomalies may be widespread.
  • Behavioral Finance does not replace but
    complements traditional models in Finance.
    Finally, noise risk is just another risk
    factor...
  • Biases are not necesserily problems. They might
    provide you opportunities as well.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com