Title: Psychology%20and%20Investments
1Psychology and Investments
2Introduction
- Classical Finance is based on the notion of Homo
Chicagoan - Rational
- Do keep track of all available investment
opportunities - Can process tons of information instantly
- For simplicity preferences are described by
relatively simple utility function - As amount of the gamble winning/loosing e cents
(p1/2) decreases, sooner or later everyone plays
3Overconfidence and Optimism (1)
- Rule of thumbs I am 99 sure should be
translated as I am 70-90 sure - Empirical Results people do overestimate the
precision of their knowledge - Alpert Raiffa 82
- Stael von Holstein 1972 inv. bankers
- Cooper et. al. 88 - enterpreneurs
4Overconfidence and Optimism (2)
- People overestimate their ability to deal with
task. The more important the task is the greater
is the optimism (Frank 35) - 82 of students are in top 30 of their class
(Svenson) - 81 of 2994 new business owners are sure that
their firm has 70 or better chances of survival.
Only 39 thought that the business like theirs
has similar chances (Cooper).
BAD GOOD
5Overconfidence and Individual Investors Barber
Odean (1)
- Individual Investors Behavior
- H1 Overconfident investors buy transactions
should underperform - H2 Overconfident investors sell transactions
should overperform - Transaction cost for round-trip ?6 ?buys
should overperform sells by 6 - Result of BarberOdean
- 4mo rBUY-rSELL ?-2.5
- 1 yr rBUY-rSELL ?-5.1
- 2 yr rBUY-rSELL ?-8.6
6Overconfidence and Individual Investors Barber
Odean (2)
- Turnover
- The more investors trade the more they reduce
their return. - Partitioning investors into quintiles
- Quitile that trades unfrequently underperform
bu-and-hold strategy for 0.25 annually. - Active traders underperformed 7.04
- Gender Boys will be boys
- Overall, men claim more ability than do women,
but this difference emerges most strongly on
masculine tasks Deaux Farris, 1977 - BarberOdean Men traded 45 more actively. The
difference between returns of men and women is
0.94
7Overconfidence and Individual Investors (3)
- Goetzmann Peles 1997
- AAII members(informed investors) survey
- On average investors overestimate the performance
of their mutual funds by 3.4 - If investors have control over choosing the fund,
their estimate exceed the real number by 8.6
(vs. 2.4 for defined contributions plans) - ?Illusion of control matters. Internet and online
access provides that kind of illusion - Barber and Odean Fast dies first Investors who
switch to online trading underperform more than
before - Metrick (NBER2000) Thades done through online
channel are unambiguously less profitable
8Overconfidence what to do?
- New year resolution list (Kaneman Riepe)
- Always analyse worst case scenario, avoid focus
on upside - Keep the list of past recommendation you made
that did not work (Caesar, you are just a man...) - Serious stuff
- Create sub-account in which investor trades
(gambles) as he/she wish. Typical client invests
5-7 of his portfolio himself with dismal
results. - Give em more control. Clients are wanting more
details, more paper and more technology (Hurley
2000) - Education matters
9Confirmation Bias
- August 1987 saw a historically high valuation of
dividends, beating out even that of 1929. The
result was a 1,000 points crash - (Prechter,1997)
- True, low DivY was followed by low returns in the
following year 33 times in 1872-1999. - But Low DivY high Ret 31 years
- High DivY low Ret 31 years
- High DivY high Ret 33 years
10Confirmation Bias(2)
- Cure Statistical analysis.
- 1year return no relation
- 10yr annualized 10yr returns strong positive
correlation - Ref. Due FisherStatman, JPM 2000
11An Example
- Initial endowment 300. Consider a choice
between - a sure gain of 100
- a 50 chance to gain 200, a 50 chance to gain
0. - Initial endowment 500. Consider a choice
between - a sure loss of 100
- a 50 chance to lose 200, a 50 chance to lose
0.
12Reversal in Choice
- Case 1 72 chose option 1, 28 chose option 2.
- Case 2 36 chose option 1, 64 chose option 2.
- gt A reversal in Choice
- Problem framed as a gain decision maker is risk
averse. - Problem framed as a loss decision maker is risk
seeking.
13Allais Paradox
- Case 1 consider a choice between
- 1 million with certainty.
- 5 million with prob 0.1, 1m with prob 0.89 and
0 with prob 0.01 - Case 2 consider a choice between
- 1m with prob 0.11, 0 with prob 0.89.
- 5m with prob 0.10 and 0 with prob 0.90.
14Allais Paradox Explanation
- u(1m) gt 0.10u(5m) 0.89u(1m) 0.01u(0m)
- Add 0.89u(0m) - 0.89u(1m) to both sides.
- 0.11u(1m) 0.89u(0m) gt 0.10u(5m) 0.90u(0m)
- Violates Expected Utility Theorem!
15Prospect Theory
- Proposed by two psychologists Daniel Kahneman
and Amos Tversky. - Gambles are evaluated relative to a reference
point. - Decision maker analyzes gains and losses
differently. - Incremental value of a loss is larger than that
of a loss. - the hurt of a 1000 loss is more painful than
the benefit of a 1000 gain.
16Loss aversion and return patterns
- Barberis et. al (99) money in the bank affects
the level of risk aversion. - Investors who make money feel rich, they
exhibit smaller loss aversion?. - Investors overinvest in stock market, further
pushing the prices up - Equity premium is low
- Investors who loose money exhibit higher risk
aversion, move out of the market - Simple model of investor sentiment.
17What to do ?
- Investigate your clients loss aversion
- Use derivative instruments (may be, custom-build)
- Equity-linked structured notes
- Equity-linked annuities
- Protective puts on index
- Opportunities for investment advisors one size
does not fit all!
18Disposition Effect, Regret Avoidance and Anchoring
- Barber and Odean (again!)
- Investors hold on loosers and sell winners
- Anchoring
- NASDAQ is down from its highs (No questions how
reasonable high was) - P/E level in Japan in 90s is acceptable (w.r.t.
anchoring level of 1980s) - Money illusion (counting nominal and not real
money) - Stop orders might be useful, statistical analysis
is important.
19Framing
- Benartzi Thaler (96)
- When shown series of 30 one-year return, people
allocate 40 to stocks and 60 to bonds. - When shown just cummulative 30 yr. return, the
allocation was 9010... - Effect of framing for current market entrants.
- Opportunity example covered calls
- Framing one should use the broader possible
frame. Role of education.
20Mental Compartments
- Hedging people hedge not against the risk of
future cash flows but against the risk of a
particular transaction - Usage of derivatives by firms
- 50 hedged transactions lt1 yr. Into the future
- 11 hedged transactions gt1 yr. Into the future
- Long-term short-term investments compartment.
- It is difficult to ask client to sell the
security designated as long-term investment.
Way out covered calls.
21Role of Investor Behavior
- Bounded Rationality satisficing behavior.
Information processing limitations. Example
memory limitations. - Investor Sentiment beliefs based on heuristics
rather than Bayesian rationality. - Investors may react to irrelevant information
and hence may trade on noise rather than
information.
22Behavioral Heuristics and Decision-Making Biases
- What strategies do decision makers use when faced
with difficult decisions, especially ones that
involve uncertainty? - Commonly Used Heuristics
- Availability familiarity breeds investment.
- Representativeness judgment based on similarity.
Patterns in random sequences. - Reliance on the judgment of other people (Keynes
beauty contest analogy).
23Gamblers Fallacy
- Investors may apply law of large numbers to small
sequences. - Example fair coin tossing.
- THTHTHHHHHH -gt P(T) ?, P(H) ?.
- Which of the 2 sequences is more likely to occur
in a fair coin tossing experiment? - HHHHHHTTTTTTHHHHHH
- HHTHTHHTHTTHTHHTTH
24Fashions and Fads
- People are influenced by each other. There is a
social pressure to conform. - Herding behavior safety-in-numbers.
- Informational Cascades
- Positive Feedback
- Example excessive demand for internet IPOs.
Extremely high opening day returns.
25Can arbitrage opportunities exist?
- Yes!
- Real-world arbitrage is always risky. No
riskless hedge for the arbitrageur. - Arbitrageur facesnoise trader risk mispricing
can become worse before it disappears. - Close substitutes (needed for arbitrage
positions) may not be available. - Fundamentally identical assets may NOT sell at
identical prices.
26Behavioral Finance Two Major Foundations
- Investor Sentiment creates disturbances to
efficient prices. - Limited arbitrage arbitrage is never riskfree,
hence it does not counter irrational
disturbances. - Prices may not react to information by the
right amount. - Prices may react to non-information.
- Markets may remain efficient.
27Example of Investor sentiment Rose.com
- 63 companies that change the name from Widget to
Widget.com/.net within Jan-Mar 98 - 80 announcement effect
- Renaming the company attracts investors with
bullish sentiment towards internet stock. - Rule of thumbs thinking change of name
change in strategy. - Reacting to non-information
28Investor Sentiment, Bubbles and Crashes
- Case Shiller(88)
- Expectations about future house value
appreciation is an increasing function of
previous period appreciation. - Affects the decision to purchase the new house.
- Frankel Froot
- Long-term is overvalued w.r.t. Y, but short
term it will go up. - Effect of magical thresholds (100Y1)
- / is another good example.
- Shiller (88) Investors sold in 87 because they
believed that the market is going to decline
further. - Bigger sucker theory.
29Investor sentiment and funds flow
- Goetzmann, Massa(99,Y2K)
- behavioral factors can explain 45 in
cross-sectional variation in mutual funds
returns - Mf flow is by itself responsible for significant
of the resent market run. - Those inflows are heavily affected by the opinion
of experts and behavioral factors.
30Irrational Behavior of Professional Money
Managers
- May choose a portfolio very close to the
benchmark against which they are evaluated (for
example SP500 index). - Herding may select stocks that other managers
select to avoid falling behind and looking
bad. - Window-dressing add to the portfolio stocks that
have done well in the recent past and sell stocks
that have recently done poorly.
31Summary
- Investor behavior does have an impact on the
behavior of financial markets. How much? Not
clear! - Both social and psychological must be taken
into account in explaining the behavior of agents
in financial markets. - Market anomalies may be widespread.
- Behavioral Finance does not replace but
complements traditional models in Finance.
Finally, noise risk is just another risk
factor... - Biases are not necesserily problems. They might
provide you opportunities as well.