GIS for Decision Support - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

GIS for Decision Support

Description:

GIS for Decision Support – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: olms
Category:
Tags: gis | decision | fess | support

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GIS for Decision Support


1
GIS for Decision Support
  • Efforts currently underway at the
    Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department

2
Attributes of the Ideal Decision Support GIS
  • Clear, prompt feedback
  • Intelligible and transparent to citizen boards
    reflecting their common sense perceptions
  • Promptly modifiable readily tweakable
  • Related to quantifiable goals
  • Promoting continuous improvement

3
Example 1 Redistricting
  • Clear, quantifiable goals
  • Dont divide jurisdictions
  • Concentrate minority voting areas
  • Arrive at nearly equal districts
  • Immediate feedback table with calculations is
    built in to extension
  • Intelligible to lay people

4
Example 2 School Boundaries
  • Clear, quantifiable goals
  • Balance minority enrollment
  • Balance enrollment with school capacity
  • Avoid busing costs promote neighborhood schools
  • Immediate feedback table with calculations is
    somewhat exportable to Excel
  • Intelligible to lay people

5
Charge Statement Parameters
  • Must take into consideration the school
    district's integration plan and comply with state
    laws should balance attendance by race and
    socio-economic status.
  • Provide for equitable educational spaces for all
    necessary programs in each building.
  • Strive for as much future placement stability as
    possible for students by considering the impact
    of projected population growth and development.
  • Maximize efficient use of space, building staff
    and transportation resources.
  • Strive to place all students in a building
    closest to their residence, especially for
    residences within the walking boundary of the
    school.
  • Consider natural and man-made barriers when
    determining attendance boundaries.
  • Promote contiguous attendance boundaries.
  • Move as many students together from one building
    to the next, K-12.
  • Provide a recommendation relative to whether
    students may voluntarily complete the last grade
    in the building currently attending prior to
    implementation of the boundary change.

6
Integration
  • Must take into consideration the school
    district's integration plan and comply with state
    laws should balance attendance by race and
    socio-economic status (SES).
  • range of enrollment percentages by race and SES
    in elementary, middle, high schools (range
    highest lowest)
  • difference between majority students at all
    levels required to change schools and minority
    students required to change schools
  • difference between high SES and low SES
    students required to change schools at all levels
  • gap between ratios of enrollment by race and the
    allowable maximum or minimum

7
Integration Indicator Example
8
Equitable Spaces
  • Provide for equitable educational spaces for all
    necessary programs in each building.
  • Balance enrollment so that no school is over
    capacity.
  • Minimize the range between highest ratio of
    enrollment to capacity and the lowest ratio see
    placement stability.

9
Equitable Spaces
10
Example 3 CLUES Model
  • Comprehensive Land Use Evaluation System
  • Fair, efficient, sustainable land use
  • Quantify land use policies so can be consistently
    applied across the county in a comparative
    fashion how suitable is a site compared to all
    others in the County?
  • Use of ModelBuilder on laptop so can easily tweak
    in face of concerns raised by public, Planning
    Commission, County Board

11
Resource Suitability Model
12
Input data
13
One option to calculate
14
And its result
15
Now a tweak
16
And this result
17
Compare results
18
Now look at cover
19
And combine with open space factors
20
Suburban ratings
21
Suburban factors
22
Suburban suitability
23
Composite CLUES Score
24
Resulting in a final comparative model
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com