Management Options for Lodgepole Pine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Management Options for Lodgepole Pine

Description:

Management Options for Lodgepole Pine. in Southern Interior British Columbia ... Management Challenges ... Density management: higher densities for more stand volume? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: teresan2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Management Options for Lodgepole Pine


1
Management Options for Lodgepole Pine in
Southern Interior British Columbia
2
  • How do we manage lodgepole pine in BC?
  • It depends on where you are!!!!!

3
Biogeoclimatic Zones of British Columbia
Major Forested Interior Zones SBPS light
blue IDF Orange SBS light purple ICH
yellow MS brown ESSF Dark purple
Montana
Idaho
Wash
4
Characteristics of Biogeoclimatic Zones
5
Management Challenges
  • IDF and SBPS have growing season moisture
    deficits and frosts but have less vegetation
    competition
  • SBS and ICH are warmer and wetter with higher
    growing sites but vegetation competition is a
    concern
  • ESSF is cold, usually wet, and can have serious
    vegetation problems combined with snow press
  • Beetle is everywhere!

6
Regeneration Methods
  • Drier zones (IDF and SBPS) natural regeneration
    is often used although some sites are planted
  • Wetter areas (SBS, ICH, and ESSF) usually
    promptly planted to mitigate vegetation
    competition
  • Most sites are clearcut but some research using
    group selection has been quite successful.

7
Silviculture Treatments
  • Site preparation
  • Brushing
  • Density Management
  • Fertilization
  • Alternatives to Clearcutting

8
Site Preparation
  • Commonly microsite planting has been used
    operationally
  • Site preparation is used on some sites to both
    ensure survival and enhance early growth.
    Successful treatments by ecological grouping are
  • Dry (IDF SPBS) linear trenching (Ripper Tooth,
    Disc trenching, etc)
  • Moist sites (SBS ICH) site preparation treatments
    have had minimal effect with some improvement
    from vegetation removal (Leno, V-Plow, Disc
    trenching, etc)
  • Cold and wet (ESSF) vegetation control and
    mounding (excavator, Disc trenching)

9
IDF Site Preparation
10
Pl Height 16 years





11
SBS Site Preparation
Leno
V-Plow
Ripper Tooth
12
ESSF Site Preparation
13
Pl Height (ESSF)







14
Spruce Height (ESSF)



15
ESSF
12 year old pine
12 year old spruce
16
Brushing
  • Try to avoid by using site preparation and/or
    quick planting of fast growing species i.e. pine
  • Limited use of herbicides due to poor public
    acceptance and problems in avoiding streams
  • Manual methods more common (occasional use of
    sheep which is tricky with pine)
  • Removal of broadleaves from lodgepole pine stands
    is an ongoing discussion.

17
To Brush or not to Brush?
18
12 year old stand In the SBS
15 year old stand In the IDF
19
SBS
IDF
20
SBS
IDF
21
Changes in Light Intensity by Ecological Zone
Comeau et al 2005
22
IDF 10 yrs planted
SBPS 12 yrs
SBS 18 yrs
23
Density Management
  • Very little done in the last five years due to
    Mountain Pine Beetle activity
  • Operational targets were usually 648 to 1012
    stems per acre.
  • Recently the maximum density allowed has
    increased to 10,121 stems per acre

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Fertilization
  • Most pine are N and S deficient and many are also
    deficient in B
  • A common operational blend is urea and ammonium
    sulphate (35-0-0-10S), which delivered 200 kg
    N/ha and 58 kg S/ha and if B is needed 1.5-3 kg
    B/ha is added.
  • No fertilization has occurred over the last five
    years due to the beetle

27
Optimal fertilization trial
6-10 years
6-10 years
1-5 years
1-5 years
600 sph 243 st/ac 1100 sph 445 st/ac 1600
sph 648 st/ac
From Brockley R.P 2005
28
Fertilized vs Unfertilized Stand
Increased diameter growth but not height growth
From Brockley R.P 2005
29
Height Repression
30
Height growth response on 36 year old unspaced
pine
31
3 years after fertilization
Pre-fertilization
32
Fertilizing 70 year old pine
Pre-fertilization
3 years after fertilization
33
Alternatives to Clearcutting
  • Group Selection methods have been attempted in
    various ecosystems
  • Some examples are Quesnel Highland (ESSF), Date
    Creek (ICH), Satah Mountain (SBPS)

34
8 Year old pine
35
High elevation ESSF
At this elevation pine is alive in only the
largest openings.
13 year old pine
36
Beetle Attack!!!!!
37
Summary
  • Site preparation dry reduce moisture stress,
    moist reduce vegetation competition, high -
    warmth
  • Brushing consider vigour of the competing
    vegetation
  • Density management higher densities for more
    stand volume??
  • Fertilization increases in diameter versus
    increases in height
  • Alternatives to Clearcutting optimal gap size
    will vary depending on where you are!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com