THE OLAPOLTP CULTURAL CONFLICT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

THE OLAPOLTP CULTURAL CONFLICT

Description:

Design is Part of the Process. Your Done When the User Stops. Calling. OLTP CULTURE ... Doug Hackney: Cach Loosened Purse Strings. OLAP:EXECUTIVE SPONSORSHIP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: UIS52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE OLAPOLTP CULTURAL CONFLICT


1
THE OLAP/OLTP CULTURAL CONFLICT
FORUM II
Ron Allan Georgetown University
allanr_at_georgetown.edu

2
Sean Kelly Required
  • A New Mindset
  • TV vs Radio

3
OLTP
  • OnLine Transaction Processing
  • Technology of Live Systems
  • Stands for Regimes That are
  • Tightly Controlled
  • Hierarchal
  • Schedules
  • Milestones
  • Deadlines
  • Detailed Planning

4
OLAP
  • OnLine Analytical Processing
  • Iterative Approach
  • Design is Part of the Process
  • Your Done When the User Stops
  • Calling

5
OLTP CULTURE
  • Core Business Systems Have Become
  • Larger
  • More Powerful
  • More Complex
  • More Integrated
  • Requiring at the Detail Level
  • Close Co-ordination
  • Conformity
  • Minimization of Creativity

6
OLTP CULTURE (cont)
  • The Technologies are so Complex
  • Difficult to Grasp at Detail Level
  • Leads to a Culture of
  • Planning
  • Milestones
  • Deadlines
  • Providing a Common Vocabulary for Implementers
    and Users
  • Wisdom of Secretary Rumsfeld

7
OLTP CULTURE (cont)
  • Culture of Procedures has Stood the Test of Time
  • Forty Year Geometric Expansion of
  • Computerized Processes
  • Data Stored
  • Decomposition of Project Provides Managers with
    a Feeling of Control

8
OLTP CULTURE (cont)
  • SOME DOWNSIDES
  • Techies Regard Procedures as Drudgery
  • Breeds a Culture of Control
  • Breeds Passive Control
  • Experimentation Deemed Inappropriate
  • Conflicts with Requirement for Timely
    Decisions

9
OLTP CULTURE (cont)
  • OLTP PROCESS SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE
  • Implementers are Presented With a
    Design!!
  • Already Worked Out
  • Tested and Refined by Use
  • Requiring Little Additional Creativity

10
OLAP CULTURE
  • Characterized by What It Is Not
  • i.e., Not Buttoned Down
  • Bite Off Small Parts Partial Projects
  • Involved Users Test Results as They Occur
  • Smaller the Bites, the More Rapid the
    Adjustments
  • Each Partial Project Informs the Next Partial
    Projectand Overall Strategy

11
OLAP CULTURE (cont)
  • OLAP Projects are Characterized by the Way They
    End
  • Battle of Britain
  • We Got Up One Day and the Germans Didnt Come
  • OLAP Projects are Done When the Phone Stops
    Ringing

12
OLAP CULTURE (cont)
  • OLAP Approach is Not a Non-Methodology
  • Users must Review Designs for Completeness
  • Typical Business Questions Must Be Answered
  • One Type of Query Not Favored over Another
  • Methodology Structured to Permit Evolution of
    Design

13
OLAP TECHNOLOGY
  • Data Warehousing is an Iterative Process
  • The Users Must Be Involved
  • OLTP Systems Keep Records
  • OLAP Systems Provide Information

14
OLAP TECHNOLOGY
  • THE FIELD OF DREAMS SCENARIO
  • OLAP Systems provide Info for the Non-Routine
    Parts of Users Work
  • If an OLAP System is Not Intuitive, Users Wont
    Use It
  • Just Because You Build It Doesnt Mean That
    They Will Come

15
OLTP vs OLAP
  • Give Us Your Requirements
  • OLTP Performs Tasks that are
  • Structured
  • Routine
  • OLAP Performs Tasks that are
  • Wide in Varity
  • Non-specific
  • Not Contemplated at Design Time

16
OLTP vs OLAP
  • OLAP REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT
  • Often a Waste of Time
  • If Enough is Known to Develop Detailed
    Requirements
  • Its Probably not an OLAP Project

17
OLTP vs OLAP
  • DETAILED PLANNING OF OLAP PROJECTS
  • Tends to be Self-Defeating Because
  • Planning by Staff and Users Generates New
    knowledge, Which
  • Makes Plan Obsolete, Then
  • Plan Cant be Revised without Several Meetings

18
OLTP vs OLAP
  • WORKING TO THE RULE
  • Technically Sophisticated Users Reluctant to
    Play, because
  • They Fear that IT will Work to the Requirement,
    then
  • Declare Victory, and
  • Go On to Next Project, Leaving
  • User Requirements Met, but
  • User Needs Unmet

19
OLAPDESIGN ITERATION
  • Physical Design is Crucial
  • Effective and Robust Design cant be Planned
  • It Must be Iterated

20
  • SEAN KELLY ONCE MORE
  • The physical database design for the specific
    industry is THE most Important DW Component.  If
    you dont have a good PHYSICAL DESIGN, NOTHING
    else can make up for it 
  • Not the RDBMS engine
  • Not the front-end tool
  • Not the data extract tool
  • Not technical ingenuity
  • Not the data loading utilities
  • Not more processors
  • Not the business vision
  • Not even consultants !

21
OLAPDESIGN ITERATION
  • Concept Well Known in Data Warehouse Community
  • Why are so Many Projects Struggling?
  • Creeping OLTPization of OLAP Projects

22
OLAPTHE HISTORY
  • Early Data Warehouse Developers Were Left Alone
  • OLTP Managers Assumed it would Fail
  • Irrational Desire for Useful Information

23
OLAPTHE SUCCESS
  • Some Data Warehouse Projects Succeeded
  • OLTP Managers Feared DW Success without Their
    Assistance and Worse
  • Not Under Their Control
  • Doug Hackney Caché Loosened Purse Strings

24
OLAPEXECUTIVE SPONSORSHIP
  • OLTP Managers Asserted Control by Imposing
    Procedures
  • Sean Kelly Executive Sponsorship Means Someone
    Far Enough Up the Hierarchy to Intimidate IT
  • Make IT Knock It Off when it Interferes with
    the Iterative Process

25
OLAPEND OF RESISTANCE
  • Resistance to Kimball Ended about 6 Years Ago
  • Accepting Kimball Did Not Lead to Accepting
    OLAP
  • Creeping OLTPization
  • Hofer Competent Bureaucrats Take Over Control
    the New Paradigm

26
OLAPTHE DECLINE
  • Decline in the Importance of Intuitiveness
  • Early Technical Selling Point Intuitiveness
  • De-emphasis on Physical Model
  • Decline of Push the Decision Down to Point of
    Impact

27
OLAPQUERY TOOL ATTITUDE
  • Vendor Accepts Kimball
  • Rejects ER Diagram
  • Suck Up to IT Departments
  • Commoditization of Product
  • Emphasis Shifts to Sale of Services

28
OLAPWHATS TO BE DONE
  • OLTP Mindset will not Go Away
  • OLAP Practitioners Must Lead
  • OLTP Managers Be Brought to See that OLTP
    Culture is Inappropriate
  • Build a Little Give Users a Little

29
OLAPBE INFORMED
  • Know What You Know
  • Dont be Wimpy
  • Keep Users Informed
  • Keep OLAP Projects in Perspective
  • Dont Hype
  • Teach Executives the Difference between OLAP
    and OLTP
  • Wisdom of Arthur Fonzerelli

30
OLAPTHE NEXT GENERATION
  • Iterative Process Must Gain Acceptance
  • OLTP Managers Must become Comfortable with
    Iteration
  • OLAP Leaders will take the Majority of the
    Grief Because
  • It is They Who Put the Ball in Play

31
  • THE END

32
  • Ron Allan
  • Georgetown University
  • Phone 202-687-8967
  • E-mail allanr_at_georgetown.edu
  • http//www.georgetown.edu/users/allanr/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com