Analgesic Aspects of ERAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Analgesic Aspects of ERAS

Description:

No limitation of movement (side effects or equipment) Absence of ... Reduced myocardial ischaemia/infarction. Reduced incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:282
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: Goog189
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analgesic Aspects of ERAS


1
Analgesic Aspects of ERAS
  • Dr Susan Nimmo
  • Consultant Anaesthetist
  • Western General Hospital
  • Edinburgh
  • Age Anaesthesia Association
  • Annual Scientific Meeting
  • May 2008

2
(No Transcript)
3
Why is Acute Pain a Problem ?
Pulmonary function
Thrombo embolic events
Cardiovasc. stress
Mobilisation
Ileus
Acute Pain
Postoperative confusional states
Stress response/ catabolism
Well being/sleep/ anxiety
4
Analgesia and Enhanced Recovery
5
Ideal Analgesia
  • Safe and acceptable to patients (and surgeons!)
  • No/low failure rate
  • Near complete dynamic pain relief
  • No gastrointestinal side effects
  • No limitation of movement (side effects or
    equipment)
  • Absence of other problem side effects
  • May be multimodal

6
(No Transcript)
7
Benefits of Epidural Analgesia
  • Dynamic pain control
  • Obtunds stress response
  • Reduction of ileus
  • Reduced post-operative pulmonary complications
  • Reduced myocardial ischaemia/infarction
  • Reduced incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism

8
Dynamic Analgesia/Mobilisation
9
Causes of Ileus
  • Degree of surgical manipulation
  • Magnitude of inflammatory and stress response
  • Sympathetic reflexes
  • Opioids
  • Salt and water overload/bowel oedema

10
(No Transcript)
11
Outcome
  • 64 patients randomised to epidural analgesia or
    PCA opioid
  • Elective colonic resection
  • Equivalent peri-operative care early nutrition
    and assisted mobilisation as able
  • Carli et al. Am Soc Anesth 2002

12
Results
  • Epidural group
  • Lower pain and fatigue scores
  • Earlier return of bowel function
  • Significantly better 6 min walking test distance
    at 3 and 6 weeks
  • Significantly better health related quality of
    life scoring at 3 and 6 weeks

13
Our practice.
  • EPIDURAL FOR 72 HOURS
  • T10/11 for left sided and anterior resections
  • T8/9 for right hemicolectomy
  • diamorphine or p/f morphine and 0.1-0.25
    bupivacaine bolus
  • bupivacaine 0.1 and fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml
    infusion
  • Plus paracetamol
  • STEP DOWN
  • oral tramadol (or fentanyl patch/ oral oxycontin)
  • paracetamol
  • ? ibuprofen/celecoxib

14
(No Transcript)
15
Master Trial
  • 915 high risk patients undergoing major surgery
  • Only respiratory failure less frequent
  • No effect on mortality
  • But
  • Better dynamic analgesia
  • No significant adverse consequences
  • ??end points
  • ??utilising analgesia to enhance recovery

16
Success of Epidural Analgesia
  • 640 patients over 6 years
  • 1/3 excellent analgesia (80 of time with no pain
    on movement no pain at rest)
  • 1/3 good analgesia (single occurrence of pain at
    rest)
  • 1/3 poor quality analgesia
  • McLeod et al Anaesthesia 2001

17
How can we make our epidurals more effective?
  • Correct placement
  • Insertion preop with block check
  • Facilities to resite
  • Adequate securing of catheter (and filter)

18
Epidural ComplicationsInsertion and Catheter
in situ(RCOA Audit)
Complication
Estimated Incidence
Dural puncture
0.32-1.23
Neurological damage Haematoma Abscess Catheter
migration
0.016-0.56 0.03-0.0004 0.01-0.05 0.15-0.18

19
Epidural Complications Drugs
  • Complication
  • Drug errors
  • Respiratory depression
  • CNS toxicity
  • Hypotension
  • Motor blockade

Estimated Incidence ? 0.13-0.4 0.01-0.12 3-30
3
20
Epidurals and colonic blood flowFluids versus
vasopressors
  • 15 patients anterior resection for rectal
    carcinoma
  • Inferior mesenteric artery blood flow (Doppler)
  • Arterial line, oesophageal doppler cardiac output
  • Epidural induced hypotension reduced mesenteric A
    flow, which did not recover with fluid therapy
    alone but required the use of vasopressors.
  • Gould et al BJA 2002

21
BUT the Anastomosis.
  • Sympathetic block may increase colonic blood flow
    and minimise colonic distension
  • Early feeding may enhance gut blood flow
  • OR
  • Early motility may increase anastomotic
    disruption
  • Hypotension may compromise colonic blood flow, as
    may vasoconstrictors
  • Studies to date (small nos) do not tend to show
    convincing risk or benefit
  • ERAS results no increase in anastomotic leak
    rate with epidurals and feeding (and laxative)

22
Hypotension
  • Limit block height
  • Optimal fluid management
  • Haemoglobin
  • Vasoactive drugs (noradrenaline, phenylephrine)
  • Oral ephedrine for prophylaxis of postural
    hypotension on mobilising
  • Early mobilisation

23
Contraindications to Epidural Analgesia
  • Patient refusal
  • Anticoagulation
  • High risk of abscess
  • High risk of serious cardiovascular instability
  • (And failed epidural analgesia)

24
Its not just analgesia..
  • How else do we provide?
  • Attenuation of the stress response
  • Dynamic analgesia
  • Reduction of ileus
  • Multimodal analgesia/opioid sparing
  • Intraop remifentanil
  • ??NSAIDs/COX 2s
  • Local anaesthetic
  • Adjuvants eg ketamine, gabapentin

25
Local Anaesthetic Alternatives
  • Wound catheters
  • 20mls levobupivacaine
  • x 4/ day
  • Improved analgesia and opioid sparing
  • (elastomeric pump systems)

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Our practice.
  • Wound catheters levobupivacaine
  • PCA opioid (morphine or fentanyl)
  • Regular paracetamol
  • ? Ibuprofen/celecoxib
  • ? Ketamine

29
Conclusions
  • Thoracic epidural analgesia is currently the gold
    standard room for improvement
  • Systemic multimodal analgesia can be a good
    alternative
  • Effective analgesia is a pivotal requirement for
    enhanced recovery

30
(No Transcript)
31
ERAS(Enhanced Recovery After Surgery)
  • An international collaboration group
  • Prof Henrik Kehlet
  • (Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Scotland, Sweden)

32
Aims of ERAS
  • To establish evidence-based ERAS protocol
  • To document outcomes and compliance when core
    protocol applied in 5 different centres
    (prospective study) current
  • To examine individual elements of core protocol
    (randomised trials)

33
Discharge Criteria
  • patient has good pain control on oral analgesics
  • patient is independently mobile, reached pre-op
    level
  • patient takes solid foods and has no IV fluids
  • all 3 criteria reached and patient willing to go
    home

34
Length of Stay - ? A Useful Endpoint
1 2 d
Patient goes home
1 2 d
Patient willing to go home
Discharge criteria fulfilled able to go home
35
ERAS results
36
Results
  • 80-99 years (3/02-11/05)
  • 32 patients (elective resection with primary
    anastomosis no stoma)
  • Mean LOS 12.8 days
  • Discharge criteria fulfilled 6.4 days
  • Deaths 1
  • Anastomotic leak rate 9

37
Achievable in the elderly ?
  • 74 patients over 70
  • Epidural analgesia/early feeding and mobilisation
  • Patients discharged at 5d
  • 3 anastomotic leak rate
  • 1 mortality
  • ? Reduced general periop complications
  • Scarfenberg et al Int J Colorectal Disease 2007

38
Achievable in the elderly ?
  • 87 patients mean age 77
  • Open colectomy ( 53 right)
  • Clear fluids POD 2, diet POD 3
  • PCA morphine
  • 89.6 tolerated early feeding
  • Mean hospital stay 3.9 days, no anastomotic
    leaks, no deaths
  • Di Fronzo et al Am Coll Surgeons 2003
  • No advantage from thoracic epidural
  • Zutshi et al Am J Surg 2005

39
Any Questions
  • ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com