Title: Economic Valuation of Coral Reefs in St. Lucia
1Economic Valuation of Coral Reefs in St. Lucia
- June 2008
- Castries, St. Lucia
- Lauretta Burke
-
- World Resources Institute
2Project Partners Include
- Regional Partners
- University of the West Indies (UWI) / Sustainable
Economic Development Unit (SEDU) - Caribbean Natural Resources Institute (CANARI)
- TT Institute of Marine Affairs (IMA)
- CEHI
- OECS
- Saint Lucia
- Government of Saint Lucia
- Planning Department
- Fisheries Department
- SMMA
- Ministry of Tourism
- Statistical Office
- St. Lucia National Trust
- SLHA, resorts
3- Financial Support
- Macarthur Foundation
- Ocean Foundation
- Henry Foundation
- Munson Foundation
- Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- SwedBio
- International Coral Reef Action Network (ICRAN)
- Buccoo Reef Trust
4Program Overview
- Ecosystem Goods and Services
- Summary of results
- Policy Applications
- Background on this Economic Valuation project
method and features - Valuation details for St. Lucia
- Policy Applications
- Buccoo Reef example
- Discussion
5Beautiful
6Valuable
7Threatened
- Coastal development
- Mangrove removal
- Sewage
- Dredging
- Runoff
- Tourism
- Overfishing
- Warming Seas
8Influencing better Management
- Economic Valuation is a tool to guide coastal
planning, investment and management in the
long-term interest of local communities and the
country
9Evaluating trade-offs
- OPTIONS
- Development options
- Enforcement of regulations
- Capping tourist numbers
- Investing in pollution control
- OUTCOMES
- Revenue streams from tourism
- Societal benefits from reefs
- Ecosystem goods and services
10Economic Valuation of Coral Reefs
- WRI (with partners) developed a coral reef
valuation methodology and implemented valuations
for the coral reefs of Tobago and St. Lucia. -
- The study evaluated the overall annual economic
contribution of coral reef-associated - tourism and recreation,
- fisheries, and
- shoreline protection services.
11Ecosystem Services
- Ecosystem goods (such as food) and services (such
as waste assimilation) represent the benefits
human populations derive, directly or indirectly,
from ecosystems. -
12Ecosystem Services from Coral Reefs
Provisioning Services -food fish and shellfish -genetic resources - natural medicines and pharmaceuticals -ornamental resources - building materials Regulating Services - carbon storage / climate regulation -erosion control -storm protection Cultural Services -spiritual and religious values -knowledge systems / educational values -inspiration -aesthetic values -social traditions -sense of place -recreation and ecotourism
Supporting Services -sand formation -primary production Supporting Services -sand formation -primary production Supporting Services -sand formation -primary production
13Ecosystem Services from Coral Reefs
Provisioning Services -food fish and shellfish -genetic resources - natural medicines and pharmaceuticals -ornamental resources - building materials Regulating Services - carbon storage / climate regulation -erosion control -storm protection Cultural Services -spiritual and religious values -knowledge systems / educational values -inspiration -aesthetic values -social traditions -sense of place -recreation and ecotourism
Supporting Services -sand formation -primary production Supporting Services -sand formation -primary production Supporting Services -sand formation -primary production
14Non-Valued Services
- Total Economic Value (TEV) would also include
- Other Use Values
- Research Values
- Option Values (e.g. pharmaceutical)
- Carbon storage
- Non-Use Values
- Bequest Value
- Existence Value
We focus on values that can be reliably estimated
using available data
15Summary of Valuesfor St. Lucia
16Valuation Summary Tourism and Recreation
- Coral reef-associated tourism and recreation
contributed between US160 and 194 million to
the national economy in 2006.
17Valuation Summary Fisheries
- Coral reef-associated fisheries
- important for cultural tradition, safety net, and
livelihood - provide annual economic benefits estimated at
between US0.5 0.8 million.
18Valuation Summary Shoreline Protection
- Shoreline Protection Services of Coral Reefs
- avoided erosion and storm damage from waves
valued between US28 and 50 million per year.
19Valuation Summary
- Tourism and Recreation - US160 to 194 million
in 2006. - Coral reef-associated fisheries - US0.5 0.8
million / year - Shoreline protection services US28 and 50
million per year. - These are significant compared to St. Lucias
GDP, which was 825 million in 2005. - Coral reefs provide other important values not
estimated in this study, and these numbers should
be regarded as a lower bound estimate.
20Coral Reefs economically important to St. Lucia
- Valuation can highlight
- Significant contribution to GDP
- Taxes paid to government
- Jobs and wages dependent on coral reefs
- Value of social safety net
- Supports
- Coastal Planning (shoreline protection analysis)
- Evaluation of trade-offs
21Economic Valuation applications
- Estimate Economic Contribution to GDP
- Compare benefits of development / management
options - Encourage increased investment in coastal
management / MPAs / fisheries management - Identify sources of support for management /
policy / protected areas - Set fees, such as visitor fees
- Damage assessment
- Comparing reef-dependence
22St. Lucia - specific examples
- To guide future development, including evaluating
- the changes resulting from marina development on
east and west coasts - The benefits of investing in improved sewage
treatment - Guide the management planning for SMMA or Point
Sabel - Examine changes in fisheries management and the
impact on short-term livelihoods versus long-term
benefits - To evaluate tourism carrying capacity and
potential revenue - To estimate loss of local use of beaches due to
development
23EV Project Characteristics
- Develop method which is simple and replicable
- Rely predominantly on existing, available data
- Develop a tool to guide valuation and apply to
policy questions. - Produce coral reef valuation estimates for 2
pilot areas (Tobago and St. Lucia) - Estimate likely economic loss due to coral reef
degradation
24Valuation Main Components
- Tourism
- Method Financial Analysis
- (Net revenues plus transfers)
- Fisheries
- Method Financial Analysis
- (Net revenues plus transfers)
- Shoreline Protection
- Method Avoided Damages
25Challenges
- Distinguishing the coral-reef associated benefits
- Tourism
- Fisheries
- Shoreline protection
- Valuing local use
- Secondary (indirect) economic impacts
26Tourism Components
- Accommodation
- Reef Recreation Diving
- Reef Recreation Snorkeling
- Marine Park Revenues
- Misc. Expenses (e.g., departure taxes, visitor
expenditure) - Local Use
- Indirect economic effects
27Tourism Valuation issues
- Identifying coastal visitors
- Quantifying reef recreation
- Getting accurate MPA visitation numbers
- Estimating labor and other operating costs
28Tourism and Recreation Valuation Assumptions
- 25 of visitors come to St. Lucia in part due to
the reefs. - Non-labor operating costs about 40
29Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
30Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
31Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
32Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
Misc. Visitor Expenses 21.2
33Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
Misc. Visitor Expenses 21.2
Total Direct Impact 91.6
34Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
Misc. Visitor Expenses 21.2
Total Direct Impact 91.6
(11 of GDP)
35Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
Misc. Visitor Expenses 21.2
Total Direct Impact 91.6
Indirect economic Impact 68 102
36Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
Misc. Visitor Expenses 21.2
Total Direct Impact 91.6
Indirect economic Impact 68 102
Total Direct Indirect Impact US160 194 million
37Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
Misc. Visitor Expenses 21.2
Total Direct Impact 91.6
Indirect economic Impact 68 102
Total Direct Indirect Impact US160 194 million
Consumer Surplus 2.2 2.4
38Tourism Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million)
Accommodation Value 64.7
Reef Recreation Diving 4.9
Reef Recreation Snorkeling 0.8
Marine Park Revenues 0.1
Misc. Visitor Expenses 21.2
Total Direct Impact 91.6
Indirect economic Impact 68 102
Total Direct Indirect Impact US160 194 million
Consumer Surplus 2.2 2.4
Local Use 52 109
39Local Reef Use Survey
- Commissioned a survey through the University of
West Indies / Sustainable Economic Development
Unit / Government of St. Lucia, Department of
Statistics - 300 people surveyed in 6 locations in St. Lucia
(Soufriere, Vieux Fort, Anse La Raye, Castries
town, Gros Islet, Dennery/Micoud) - Designed to measure local use of beaches and
reefs as well as recreational and subsistence
fishing
40Fisheries Components
- Commercial Fisheries
- Fish Processing and Cleaning
- Local Use (fishing)
- Indirect economic effects
- Focus on reef-associated species snapper,
grouper, wrasse, grunts, squirrelfish, parrot
fish, and lobster.
41Fisheries Valuation Issues
- Limited data on local use
- Focus on economic impact does not fully capture
social values.
42Commercial Fishing in St. Lucia
- Estimate derived from two approaches
- reef fish productivity
- recorded landings
43a) Reef Fish Productivity
- Reef Area 33 km2 (from this project)
- Estimated fish productivity rate range of 1 to
5 MT of fish / km2 of coral reef - Potential sustainable harvest of 73,000 to
363,000 lb of reef fish
44b) Landings recorded
- 9 landing sites
- Fisheries Dept. data for 2002-2004
- Prices
- Pot fish EC10 (US3.75)
- Lobster EC25 (US9.00)
- Sea Urchin EC50 (US18.00)
45Average Fish Landings 2002-04
Pounds Value (US) Percent of Value
Squirrelfish 13,459 50,788 7.3
Snapper 44,995 169,795 24.5
Grouper 8,244 31,108 4.5
Parrotfish 9,930 35,445 5.1
Total for finfish 76,628 287,137 41.4
Lobster 29,000 273,585 39.5
Sea Urchin 7,251 132,538 19.1
Grand Total 112,879 693,260 100.0
46Fisheries Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US thousand)
Commercial Fisheries Gross Revenue 515 - 772
N.L. Operating Costs (25) 129 193
Commercial Fisheries Net Revenue 386 579
Fish cleaning and processing 51 77
Total Direct Impact 437 656
47Fisheries Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US thousand)
Commercial Fisheries Gross Revenue 515 - 772
N.L. Operating Costs (25) 129 193
Commercial Fisheries Net Revenue 386 579
Fish cleaning and processing 51 77
Total Direct Impact 437 656
Indirect economic Impact 82 185
48Fisheries Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US thousand)
Commercial Fisheries Gross Revenue 515 - 772
N.L. Operating Costs (25) 129 193
Commercial Fisheries Net Revenue 386 579
Fish cleaning and processing 51 77
Total Direct Impact 437 656
Indirect economic Impact 82 185
Total Direct Indirect Impact 520 841
49Fisheries Valuation for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US thousand)
Commercial Fisheries Gross Revenue 515 - 772
N.L. Operating Costs (25) 129 193
Commercial Fisheries Net Revenue 386 579
Fish cleaning and processing 51 77
Total Direct Impact 437 656
Indirect economic Impact 82 185
Total Direct Indirect Impact 520 841
Local (non-commercial) fishing 155 - 790
50Shoreline Protection Services
- Innovative method for isolating the role of coral
reefs and integrating economics - Map outputs
- Shoreline protected by coral reefs
- Areas vulnerable to waves \ storm damage
- Relative contribution of reefs to shoreline
protection
51Shoreline Protection Valuation
- Potential Valuation Methods
- Replacement Cost
- Avoided Damages
52Physical Factors
- Physical factors affecting the protection
afforded by a coral reef - orientation of the coast (windward / leeward
high energy or low energy coast) - bathymetry / shoreline profile
- shoreline shape (bay, headland)
- depth of the reef / geology (type of reef)
- distance the reef is from land
53Complex Analysis
- IMA developed shoreline protection framework -
rules for how much protection the reef affords
this coastline situation. - Can be adapted for climate scenarios
54Shoreline Protection Analysis (5 Steps)
- Identify vulnerable areas
- Identify areas protected by coral reefs
- Evaluate the relative protection provided by
reefs - Incorporate property values
- Combine to evaluate potential storm damage avoided
55 4 of St. Lucias land area rated vulnerable.
56 44 of St. Lucias coastline is protected by
coral reefs.
57Shoreline Stability Factors (from IMA)
- Coastal Geomorphology
- Coastal Geology
- Coastal Protection Structures
- Wave Energy
- Storm/Hurricane Events
- Coral Reef Index (Reef type, continuity, distance
offshore) - Coastal Elevation
- Coastal Slope
- Coastal Vegetation
- Anthropogenic Activities
58 Factor Coastal Protection Scheme (from IMA) Coastal Protection Scheme (from IMA) Coastal Protection Scheme (from IMA) Coastal Protection Scheme (from IMA) Coastal Protection Scheme (from IMA)
Factor Very High 4 High 3 Medium 2 Low 1 None 0
Coastal Geomorphology Rocky, Cliffed Coastline Soft (Limestone) Cliffs or Low Bluffs Mangroves Beaches N/A
Coastal Geology Igneous and/or Volcanic Metamorphic Sedimentary Unconsolidated Sediments N/A
Coastal Protection Structures Protected by 2 prominent headlands and breakwater Protected by 2 prominent headlands Seawalls, Riprap or Breakwaters Protected by one or two small headlands No protection by headlands
Wave Energy ( Max. Wave Height cm) lt 20 20 - 40 40 - 60 gt60 N/A
Coral Reefs Reef Type Reef Distribution Reef Distance (m) Barrier N/A lt 250 Patch N/A 250 - 500 Fringe Continuous 500 - 1000 Apron Discontinuous gt 1000 No reef present No reef present No reef present
Storm/Hurricane Events Affected by 1-5 TS every 10 years Affected by at least 5 TS every 10 years Affected by at least a category 1 every 25 years Affected by at least a category 3 every 25 years N/A
Coastal Elevation (m) gt 12 5 - 12 1 - 5 0 - 1 lt 0 (N/A)
Coastal Slope () 6.2 9.7 2.6 6.2 1.1 2.6 0.4 1.1 N/A
Coastal Vegetation Type Distribution Mangroves gt 75 length of coastline Coastal Woodlands 50 - 75 of length Thicket 25 - 50 of length Runners lt 25 length of coastline None No Vegetation
Coastal Anthropogenic Activities No sand mining, coastal development, etc. Misc. Other Activities Either sand mining or coastal development Sand mining and coastal development N/A
59Stability Factors used in St. Lucia Analysis
- Coastal Geomorphology
- Coastal Geology
- Wave Energy
- Storm/Hurricane Events
- Coral Reef Index (Reef type, continuity, distance
offshore) - Coastal Elevation
- Coastal Slope
- Coastal Vegetation
- Not Available
- Coastal Protection Structures
- Anthropogenic Activities
60Factor Integration
- 3a. Shoreline stability (RTCP)
- Sum of factor scores / n
- 3b. Relative reef contribution
- Sqrt of ((reef index / sum of factor scores) /
RTCP)) - Apply with minimum of 5 factors.
613a. Relative Total Coastal Protection (RTCP)
623b.
63(No Transcript)
64Potentially Avoided Damages
- Estimated based on property values in vulnerable
areas which are protected by a reef, based on
the relative reef contribution for that area. -
- St. Lucia property values estimated at US25 -
30 per square foot - Relative reef contribution applied at /- 20,
reflecting some uncertainty.
65Shoreline Protection Summary St. Lucia
St. Lucia
Land Area (sq km) 610 km2
Vulnerable Land Area (sq km) 24.5 km2 4
Vulnerable Area Protected by reefs (sq km) 10 km2 1.5
Shoreline length Protected by Reefs 44
Average Property Value (US) US 25 - 30
Potentially Avoided Damages (2007) US 28 50 mill
66Shoreline Protection Summary St. Lucia
St. Lucia
Potentially Avoided Damages (2007) US 28 50 mill
Potentially Avoided Damages (over 25 years) US 700 million - 1.2 Billion
67Summary of Values for St. Lucia
Coral Reef-associated (US million / yr)
Tourism and Recreation Total Direct Impact 91.6 million
Tourism and Recreation Total economic Impact 160 194 million
Fisheries economic Impact 0.5 0.8 million
Shoreline Protection Services 28 50 million
68Policy Exploration Buccoo Reef
- Tourist Destination
- Environmental issues
- water quality
- overfishing
- reef condition
- BRMP - enforcement
69Management Options Buccoo Reef
- Enforcement of no-fishing regulations
- Re-routing of storm drain
- Integrated watershed management
- Sewage treatment
70Economic Value Buccoo Reef
- Glass-bottom / snorkel Tours US1.4 mill / yr
- Tourism
- US7-8 million / yr
- US128 156 million over 25 years
- Shoreline protection - US140-250 million over 25
years
71Policy Recommendations for St. Lucia
- Improve mapping and monitoring of coral reefs and
mangroves - Maintain coastal mangroves
- Monitor and improve coastal water quality
- Monitor marine recreation and manage within
sustainable limits - Use the coral reef valuation methodology and Tool
to track the economic contribution of coral reefs
over time
72Discussion
Available online at www.buccooreef.org
and www.wri.org/project/valuation-caribbean-reefs
Contacts WRI Lauretta Burke, 1 (202) 729
7774, lauretta_at_wri.org Gov StL LaVerne Walker
lwalker2006_at_gmail.com IMA Sean Paddy, (868)
634 4291 x405, spaddy_at_ima.gov.tt