Title: Examples
1Development Styles
Examples Opportunities
2Commercial
3Retail Restaurants in close proximity, but
inconvenient or missing pedestrian access
Residential Neighborhood
Crossroads Shopping Center, Rochester, MN
Photo provided by Pictometry International, Inc.
4Very close, but no direct pedestrian access or
shortcuts to businesses
Crossroads Shopping Center, Rochester, MN
Photo provided by Pictometry International, Inc.
5Stop bars crosswalk paint worn
Sidewalk loading zone conflict
Photo provided by Pictometry International, Inc.
6NW Rochester
Shopping in close proximity to neighborhood But
Cant get there from here
Lincolnshire Neighborhood
7(No Transcript)
8Photo provided by Pictometry International, Inc.
9Photo provided by Pictometry International, Inc.
107thStreet
North Broadway
11SE Rochester
Photo provided by Pictometry International, Inc.
12Demonstration
13510 486-0427 www.urban-advantage.com
14San Jose, California
Existing conditions
15San Jose, California
Mixed-use development at sidewalk
16San Jose, California
Street trees medians and pedestrian refuges
crosswalks
17San Jose, California
Live-work housing mixed-use building
18San Jose, California
Bus lane
19San Jose, California
Red bus rapid transit lane
Commissioned by Joint Venture Silicon Valley
Network
20TRADITIONAL CENTER LOOK
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN
21Minnesota Examples
- Pedestrian Oriented
- Site Design
- Street/ROW Design
- Mixed Use
- Public Space
22- Heart of the City
- Burnsville, MN
- 54-acre smart-growth based, mixed-use, pedestrian
friendly downtown area for Burnsville. - Featuring retail, business and office, hotel and
training center facilities, community arts
center, community park and diverse housing
options. - The Heart of the city is the place to Live, Work,
Shop and Play.
23Heart of the CityBurnsville, MN
Mixed use retail condos with first floor
retail
Future Arts Center
14-Unit owner-occupied rowhouse townhomes
84-Unit Condo first floor Retail
24Lino Lakes Town CenterLino Lakes, MN
25St. Louis Park, MN
26St. Louis Park, MN
27St. Louis Park, MN
28Golden Valley, MN
29Golden Valley, MN
30St. Paul Grand Victoria
31St. Paul
32St. Paul Grand Victoria
33St. Paul Victoria Grand
34St. Paul
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37Arbor Lakes Maple Grove
38 Maple Grove
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42Robinsdale
43Neighborhood Grocery
St. Paul
44Robinsdale
45Shakopee
46Shakopee
47Shakopee
48(No Transcript)
49Pedestrian Features in Parking Lot
50Pedestrian Features in Parking Lot
51Built to the Street, but is it Pedestrian
Friendly?
- No access or doors
- No transparent windows at pedestrian level blank
wall at pedestrian level. - Lack of pedestrian level lighting
- No street trees
- Pedestrian crossings not marked.
52Commercial Center Design Principles
- Use Buildings to Frame the street
- Minimize setbacks from the street
- Improve Pedestrian Access / Safety
- Street Facing Facades
- Minimize dominance of Parking
53Neighborhood CommercialDiscussion The
Ellerbush Drawings
- Setbacks
- Build tos
- Pick up lanes
- Parking
- Landscaping Screening
54 55(No Transcript)
56Residential
57Emphasis on Dwelling
58Minneapolis
59Minneapolis
60(No Transcript)
61(No Transcript)
62(No Transcript)
63(No Transcript)
64(No Transcript)
65Projecting Garages
66NE Rochester Townhomes
67NW Rochester
68NW Rochester
69Other Considerations
70LIVABLE STREETS - RESIDENTIAL AREAS
- Key Considerations
- Safety
- Accessibility
- Streetscape Quality
- Accommodation of modes
71Additional Examples and Demonstrations
72Iowa City, IAParking Ram Ground Floor
Commercial
Photos by John Harford
73(No Transcript)
74510 486-0427 www.urban-advantage.com
75Live Oak, California
Existing conditions
76Live Oak, California
Public street improvements wider sidewalks,
crosswalks, medians, new signals, street trees,
street lamps
77Live Oak, California
New mixed-use infill on the corner
78Live Oak, California
Infill on all corners, increased pedestrian
activity
79510 486-0427 www.urban-advantage.com
80Sacramento County, California (or South
Broadway?)
Existing conditions
81Sacramento County, California
Wider sidewalks, street lamps, sharrow lanes
(shared travel), roundabout
82Sacramento County, California
Street trees
83Sacramento County, California
Infill development built to sidewalk
84510 486-0427 www.urban-advantage.com
85Eugene, Oregon
Existing conditions
86Eugene, Oregon
New sidewalks, boulevard street layout, street
lamps, bus rapid transit
87Eugene, Oregon
Street trees
88Eugene, Oregon
Mixed-use buildings
89Eugene, Oregon
Additional mixed-use densification, second BRT
lane
90Things to look for
- Streetscape
- Building
- Locations/Setbacks
- Windows Doors
91510 486-0427 www.urban-advantage.com
92Richmond, Virginia
Existing conditions
93Richmond, Virginia
Underground utilities
94Richmond, Virginia
Wider sidewalks, one-way to two-way street, new
signals, street trees, lamps
95Richmond, Virginia
Shopfront renovations, new infill building
96Richmond, Virginia
Mixed-use building on corner
97Richmond, Virginia
Street cobbles
98Richmond, Virginia
Nighttime scene
99Closing Thoughts
- Many studies have been conducted by or in
partnership with public health researchers
interested in how the built environment can be
better designed to encourage daily physical
activity. These studies show that residents of
communities designed to be walkable both drive
fewer miles and also take more trips by foot and
bicycle, which improves individual health. A
recent literature review found that 17 or 20
studies, all dating from 2002 or later, have
established statistically significant
relationships between some aspect of the built
environment and the risk of obesity. - Growing Cooler The Evidence on Urban
Development and Climate Change, 2007, Ewing,
Bartholomew, Winkelman, Walters, Chen
100Closing Thoughts
- Over the next 25 years, real estate values will
rise fastest in communities that incorporate
traditional characteristics of successful cities,
such as a concentration of amenities, a mix of
commercial and residential uses, and a pedestrian
oriented configuration - Annual Emerging Trends in Real Estate report -
1999 - by PricewaterhouseCoopers Real Estate
Group and Lend Lease Real Estate Investment
Trusts
101Consensus for Project Focus