MIG 1 Fish and Wildlife Study Plan Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

MIG 1 Fish and Wildlife Study Plan Review

Description:

Migratory Fish - Tallapoosa Basin Literature Review ... types of shoreline alterations influence fish distribution in the littoral zones. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: amandaf4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MIG 1 Fish and Wildlife Study Plan Review


1
MIG 1 Fish and WildlifeStudy Plan Review
  • April 2, 2008

2
MIG 1 Agenda
  • Introductions
  • Comments Received
  • Summary of Revisions to the MIG 1 Draft Study
    Plans
  • Next Steps in the Process

3
MIG 1 Studies
  • Migratory Fish - Tallapoosa Basin Literature
    Review
  • Lake Martin - Assessment of Fish Density and
    Species Composition Associated with Various
    Shoreline Types
  • Evaluation of Minimum Flows downstream of Martin
    Dam
  • Fish Entrainment/Turbine Mortality
  • Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species Surveys
  • Striped Bass Mortality Study
  • Lake Martin - Wildlife Management Plan

4
MIG 1 Study Plan Commenters
  • ADCNR
  • USFWS
  • ARA
  • WWF

5
Study Plan 1Migratory Fish- Tallapoosa Basin
Literature Review
  • MIG 1 Fish Wildlife

6
Study Goal
  • Develop a document that describes the migratory
    species (including American eel) that currently
    or historically used the Tallapoosa River
    including a summary of restoration plans for
    these species.

7
Revisions to Study Methodology
  • There have been no substantive changes to the
    November 2007 Draft Study plan.

8
Study Plan 2Lake Martin Assessment of Fish
Density and Species Composition Associated with
Various Shoreline Types
  • MIG 1 Fish Wildlife

9
Study Goal
  • The goal of this study is to determine if various
    types of shoreline alterations influence fish
    distribution in the littoral zones.

10
Revisions to Study Methodology
  • Investigate four habitat types natural
    undeveloped, traditional sea wall, sea wall/rip
    rap, and large stone or rock reinforced
    shorelines.
  • At least four sites for each type of habitat will
    be geo-referenced and photographed
  • Boat electrofishing will be performed at each
    site during the spring to sample fishes.
  • Additional water quality data will be collected
    at each site.

11
Study Plan 3Evaluation of Minimum Flows
Downstream of Martin Dam
  • MIG 1 Fish Wildlife

12
Study Goals
  • Understand the relationship of project operation
    and the potential impacts of hydro peaking on the
    aquatic fauna and aquatic habitat in the tailrace
    area downstream of the Martin Project and
    downstream in the Tallapoosa River below the
    Thurlow Dam
  • Explore the possibilities for flexibility in the
    Martin Dam operations that still includes peaking
    and could enhance aquatic habitats downstream of
    Martin Dam - Martin tailrace, Yates Thurlow
    reservoirs, and the Tallapoosa River downstream
    of Thurlow Dam.

13
Revisions to Study Methodology
  • Examine operations data for the Martin Project to
    identify areas of flexibility in operation.
  • Examine existing environmental studies for the
    Tallapoosa River downstream of Thurlow Dam.
  • Study area would include the immediate tailrace
    area downstream of the Martin Dam and to some
    extent the Tallapoosa River downstream of Thurlow
    Dam.
  • Include field surveys below Martin as needed to
    evaluate project impacts.

14
Study Plan 4Fish Entrainment and Turbine
Mortality
  • MIG 1 Fish Wildlife

15
Study Goals
  • To determine the potential impacts of project
    operations on entrainment and turbine mortality
    on Lake Martin fishery.

16
Revisions to Study Methodology
  • Perform entrainment estimates through the use of
    hydroacoustics (either split beam or DIDSON) in
    the penstock, trash rack, or forebay areas to
    gather information on the size and quantity of
    fish targets moving into the turbine intakes.
  • Hydroacoustic sampling will be performed on a
    seasonal basis (quarterly basis) and will collect
    data over a multiple day period encompassing both
    day and night periods. Estimates of entrainment
    will be determined through analysis of the
    collected data and compared to the results of the
    desktop analysis.

17
Study Plan 5Rare, Threatened, and Endangered
Species Surveys
  • MIG 1 Fish Wildlife

18
Study Goals
  • Determine if any Rare, Threatened, or Endangered
    species are present in the project.
  • Determine if the Martin Project operations impact
    those populations.

19
Revisions to Study Methodology
  • Field surveys will be performed by qualified
    investigators identified in coordination with the
    ADCNR and USFWS.
  • Fragmentation of any RTE populations by the
    project will be also be considered.

20
Study Plan 6Striped Bass Study
  • MIG 1 Fish Wildlife

21
Study Goal
  • Determine if Martin Project operations are
    impacting the Gulf-strain striped bass fishery in
    Lake Martin.

22
Revisions to Study Methodology
  • Expert Panel members will be identified by APC,
    ADCNR, and USFWS.
  • Hydroacoustics and tagging may also be utilized
    as supplemental collection methods to gather
    field data on striped bass distributions.

23
Study Plan 7Lake Martin Wildlife Management Plan
  • MIG 1 Fish Wildlife

24
Study Goals
  • Provide habitat diversity on APC project lands to
    enhance native vegetation and wildlife species
    (such as Priority 1 and 2 species and rare,
    threatened, and endangered species).
  • This would include the conservation, restoration,
    and management of longleaf pine systems on
    project lands.

25
Revisions to Study Methodology
  • Inclusion of Priority 1 and 2 species as
    identified in Alabamas Comprehensive Wildlife
    Strategy.
  • Habitat Management and the use of proper
    silviculture strategies.
  • General Wildlife Enhancements (controlling
    non-native invasive plant species, etc.)
  • Identify monitoring methods to measure management
    productivity.

26
Next Steps in the Process
  • Summary and FERC Process

27
Summary
  • Draft Study Plans filed with PAD NOI - June
    2008
  • Comments due on PAD (including Study Plans) -
    September 2008
  • Final Study Plans filed with FERC- November 2008
  • Stakeholders have the opportunity to file their
    recommended changes to APCs Final study plans -
    December 08 February 09

28
FERC Study Plan Process
APC files NOI PAD (June 2008)
FERC Issues SD1
FERC holds Scoping Meetings
Comments on PAD, SD1 Study Requests
60
30
30
Days
45
APC Files Proposed Study Plan (November 2008)
Comments on Study Plan
FERC Study Plan Approval (April 2009)
Study Dispute Resolution (if necessary)
60
90
90
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com