Surprise N2 at thoracotomy small peripheral ACA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Surprise N2 at thoracotomy small peripheral ACA

Description:

We should try to minimize the occurrence of 'surprise' N2 as best we can with ... Paratracheal involvement with lower and middle lobar primary ? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: sur132
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surprise N2 at thoracotomy small peripheral ACA


1
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(small peripheral
ACA)
  • ESMO International Symposium
  • On Chest Tumors
  • Geneva, March 30 2007
  • Eric Vallières MD FRCSC
  • Swedish Cancer Institute
  • Seattle, WA

2
Outline
  • A few comments
  • Resect or close
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Adjuvant radiation therapy
  • Trials

3
Outline
  • A few comments
  • Resect or close
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Adjuvant radiation therapy
  • Trials

4
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(all comers)
  • We should try to minimize the occurrence of
    surprise N2 as best we can with appropriate
    pre-thoracotomy staging
  • In 2007, such occurrence should potentially be
    lower now that we have CT-PET staging, EBUS/ EUS
    FNA!!!

5
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(all comers)
  • Mediastinoscopy
  • still an important player
  • in the
  • mediastinal staging game

6
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(all comers)
  • Despite CT and PET staging as well as mandated
    mediastinoscopy staging for radiological N1 and
    central malignancies, pN2 occurred in 14 of pts
    on S9900 (cT2N0-T1-2N1 diseases)

7
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(all comers)
  • Impossible to tell
  • how many of truly surprise N2s
  • made up the pN2 populations
  • on the IALT(26) and ANITA (27 ) trials...

8
This is not what this talk is about!!!!
9
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(small peripheral
ACA)
CT-PET cT1N0M0, max SUV 7, mediastino negative
2.2cm Stage IA Adenocarcinoma
10
Outline
  • A few comments
  • Resect or close
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Adjuvant radiation therapy
  • Trials

11
Resect or close and hopefully come back after
induction therapy
  • No randomized data to guide us
  • Decision analysis model published in 2003
    suggested that closing was superior but weak

Ferguson MK J Thorac CV Disease 2003 126
1935-42
12
Resect or close and hopefully come back after
induction therapy
  • First, you are going to be very happy if you did
    a med and it was negative.
  • Or
  • If no med was done,
  • YOU ARE GOING TO WISH YOU HAD DONE ONE

13
Resect or close and hopefully come back after
induction therapy
  • Recommend evaluate
  • 1.the extent of the nodal disease and
  • 2. the ability to achieve R0 resection.

14
Resect or close and hopefully come back after
induction therapy
  • Close if
  • R1-2 resection likely
  • Cannot get to negative highest nodal station
  • Multi level mediastinal nodal station involvement
  • Paratracheal involvement with lower and middle
    lobar primary ???

15
Heterogeneity within the Stage IIIA N2
LN-Positive Population
  • N 702

André et al J Clin Oncol 18 2981-89, 2000
16
Resect or close and hopefully come back after
induction therapy
  • With adequate preop evaluation, most of these
    cases are likely to be R0 resected in 2007
  • Most surgeons favor R0 resection (with systematic
    nodal dissection) and postop therapy

Goldstraw P et al J Thor CV Surg 107 19-28, 1994
17
Outline
  • A few comments
  • Resect or close
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Adjuvant radiation therapy
  • Trials

18
IALT Interaction with p stage
Hazard ratio
Stage I
p0.41
Stage II
Stage III
Total effect
0.86
19
Overall Survival - Stage III A (pT1-2 N2, pT3
N0-3)
20
Results - LACE
  • Overall HR (death) 0.89 (CI 0.82-0.96, p lt0.005)
  • HR (death) by stage
  • IA 1.41 (CI 0.96- 2.09
  • IB 0.93 (CI 0.78-1.10)
  • II 0.83 (CI 0.73-0.95)
  • III 0.83 (CI 0.73-0.95)

Pignon JP et al, J Clin Oncol 2006, 24(18S) 366S
abstract 7008
21
Adjuvant platinum chemo -Subset Analysis -
StageJoan Schiller ASCO 2006 Discussion
22
Outline
  • A few comments
  • Resect or close
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Adjuvant radiation therapy
  • Trials

23
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(small peripheral
ACA)

Is there a role for adjuvant radiotherapy in
this era of adjuvant chemotherapy? ANITA, non
randomized delivery of sequential adjuvant RTX ,
in a descriptive analysis suggests possible
detriment with pN1 disease but benefit for pN2
disease
Douillard JY et al, Lancet Oncol 2006 7 719-27
24
Douillard JY et al, Lancet Oncol 2006 7 719-27
25
PORT revisited
  • Population-based cohort (SEER) 7465 pts
  • i.e. non randomized data
  • PORT improved survival
  • in patients with resected N2 disease
  • (but not N0-1)

Lally BE et al, J Clin Oncol 2006 24 2998-3006
26
PORT
PORT
Lally BE et al, J Clin Oncol 2006 24 2998-3006
27
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(small peripheral
ACA)

There may be a role for adjuvant radiotherapy in
this era of adjuvant C
Bonner JA, J Clin Oncol 24(19)2978-9, 2006
Le Pechoux et al, J Clin Oncol 25(7)e10-11, 2007
28
Surprise N2 at thoracotomy(small peripheral
ACA)

If PORT, concurrent or sequential ?Concurrent
likely more toxic and may come at cost of
systemic treatment ( ECOG 3590)
Keller SM, NEJM 2000 3431217-22
29
Outline
  • A few comments
  • Resect or close
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Adjuvant radiation therapy
  • Trials

30
SWOG S0623 Resected minimal N2
Phase II Randomized 2 arm design

cN0-1 but pT1-3N2 R0
Cddp/ docetaxel 4
Cddp/ etoposide/ Radiation 2 cycles/ 1.8 Gy daily
28 (50.4)
Radiation 1.8 Gy daily 28 (50.4)
Docetaxel 3
N 120 in 1-2 yrs
PIs Quejada, Mirkovic, Albain, Calhoun
31
SWOG Resected minimal N2- FUTURE ?
Phase III

cN0-1 but pT1-3N2 R0
Chemo alone
The winner of S0623
32
LUNG ART
Phase III

R0 resected N2 disease Preop or postop chemo
Sequential PORT
No PORT
Intergroup IFrancophoneCT, EORTC, LARSpainG
N 700
33
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com