Dermalive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Dermalive

Description:

Suspension of flexible and non-resorbable fragments of Acrylic ... Zone 6 - Malar highlight 57. Zone 5 - submalar hollow 222. Zone 4 - Infraorbital hollow 582 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:178
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Sop144
Category:
Tags: dermalive | malar

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dermalive


1
Dermadeep Neues Konzept der Augmentation am
Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts
?
GÄCD 2004
2
AGE Control
Altern gehört zum Leben, die Frage ist nur, wie
sehr es einem schadet.
Hyaluronic Acid
Dr. med. M. E. Cornely Düsseldorf Wagnerstrasse
Dr. Harrer, Nürnberg
3
Hollow cheeks with Dermadeep
Before treatment
After injection
4
Soft-tissue fillers main injectable products
available on the market
gt Resorbable
gt Non-resorbable
  • Collagen
  • Hyaluronic acid
  • Autologous fat
  • Polylactic acid
  • Silicone
  • PMMA (collagen) Artecoll
  • Acrylic Hydrogel (hyaluronic acid)
  • Dermalive Dermadeep
  • Poly-acrylamid

5
Dermadeep
  • Biphasic implants
  • Acrylic hydrogel (40)
  • Non resorbable material
  • Hyaluronic acid (60)
  • Biodegradable injection vector

Suspension of flexible and non-resorbable
fragments of Acrylic Hydrogel in a sterile
non-pyrogenic and physiological solution of
slightly cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid of
non-animal origin.
6
Acrylic Hydrogel
  • Belongs to the Acrylate family
  • Inert and elastic non-resorbable material,
    renowned for its high biocompatibility
  • Its name "hydrogel" is derived from its high
    water content (26) which is stable in the
    long-term (the water molecules are trapped inside
    the acrylic hydrogel molecules).
  • Particles are flexible, elastic and resistant
    (elongation of 400 before breaking)

7
Indications of Dermadeep remodelling facial
contours
  • Filling very pronounced nasolabial folds
  • Restoring volume to the cheeks and cheekbones
  • Remodelling the chin contour
  • Improving final outcome of Facelift

8
Placement of Dermadeep
9
Nasolabial folds with Dermadeep
Before treatment
After injection
10
Clinical resultsDr. Harrer, Nürnberg
  • Treated areas(2)
  • Nasolabial folds 45
  • Lips (contouring and perioral) 21
  • Glabellar lines 13
  • Cheeks and cheekbones augmentation 12
  • Scars 8
  • Chin folds 1
  • 2 Total is gt100 as several areas may have been
    treated simultaneously

11
Clinical resultsDr. Harrer, Nürnberg
  • Efficiency of the implant after 6 years
  • ? In 96 of the cases, patients were satisfied
  • with the results.
  • ? 4 of the patients were dissatisfied or
  • considered the results to be unsufficient.

12
Clinical resultsDr. Harrer, Nürnberg
  • A clinical study conducted in 1440 patients
    during more than 6 years has shown the very good
    tolerance and the efficiency of Dermalive
    Dermadeep.
  • A total of 1630 syringes of Dermalive or
    Dermadeep has been injected (on average 1-2
    syringes per patient).
  • Complications only 6 out of 1440 patients
    developed inflammatory granuloma

13
Clinical results
  • Long-term side-effects
  • Since 1998, no necrosis, no immediate
    hypersensitivity reaction and no case of allergy
    or implant migration have been reported.

14
DERMADEEP 80-120 microns
In the INFANCY of FILLER TECHNOLOGY, SEMIPERMANENT
FILLERS HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITHNUMEROUS
COMPLICATIONS eg granulomas, nodules
  • microparticles larger than 40 microns have a
    lower chance of being phagocytised and therefore
  • less likely to initiate an inflammatory reaction
    when injected into the dermis and subdermis as a
    filler substance

Morhenn, Lemperle and Gallo Phagocytosis of
different particulate Dermal Filler Substances by
human macrophages and skin cells. Dermatol Surg
200228484-490
15
DERMADEEP
40 Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)
microfragments 80-120 microns in size with 60
crosslinked hyaluronic acid of bacteriological
origin
WOFFLES WU MD CAMDEN MEDICAL CENTRE SINGAPORE
16
6 Midface Hollow Zones - Wu
Number of patients
Zone 1 - medial infraorb rim 66
Zone 2 - middle infraorb rim 125
Zone 3 - lat infraorbital rim 178
1
3
2
6
Zone 4 - Infraorbital hollow 582
4
5
Zone 5 - submalar hollow 222
Zone 6 - Malar highlight 57
Nasolabial grooves 601
Chin 129
17
complications
  • Complaints of visible swelling, palpable
    lumpiness in
  • 10/683 0.00826
  • 9 in NJG (8 within 1month, 1 after 2 years)
  • 1 in NLG, (clinically unable to detect by
    physician)
  • all resolved with Kanakort injections
  • No redness at injections sites
  • No infection
  • No persistent granulomas
  • No migration

18
THE IDEAL FILLER
  • Particulate, biocompatible material
  • Chemically inert
  • No migration, non liquid
  • Complete encapsulation and incorporation into the
    tissues
  • Minimal inflammation, No granuloma formation
  • Easy to inject
  • Long lasting NATURAL feel

19
gt Dermalive
  • With a five-year follow-up, a global complication
    rate of less than
  • 2 per 1,000 (0.2) has been recorded for
    Dermalive.
  • In most of these reported cases, this was due to
    a misuse of the
  • product or a non-respect of the
    contraindications.
  • Observed complications appear as nodules, oedema
    and
  • induration at the injection site after six months
    in average.
  • Early medical treatment in the form of
    intralesional injections
  • (corticoids, 5FU) have been reported to be
    successful.

gt Dermadeep
On 10,000 patients treated with Dermadeep, only
two side-effects have been reported to Dermatech
(4 year follow-up).
20
Contraindications
  • Linked to the injection site
  • - Not to be injected in the Dermis
  • - Not for periorbital zone, forehead wrinkles,
    glabellar frown lines and lips and superficial
    wrinkles
  • - Avoid site where another implant is already
    present
  • - Not to be used in association with laser,
    chemical peeling or dermabrasion
  • Linked to the individual patient
  • - Tendency to develop hypertrophic scars
  • - History of autoimmune disease or under
    immunotherapy treatment
  • - Tendency to develop inflammatory and/or
    infectious skin problems
  • - Multiple allergies
  • - Known hypersensitivity to sodium hyaluronate

21
Clinical Results
  • Results of independent clinical studies have
    confirmed the very good tolerance, the safety and
    the efficiency of Dermadeep.
  • After 4 years of use, no necrosis, no immediate
    hypersensitivity reaction
  • and no case of allergy or implant migration have
    been reported.
  • However,
  • the occurrence of an adverse reaction several
    months or years after the injection is possible
  • with all implants (resorbable or non-resorbable),
  • i.e. inflammatory granuloma or delayed
    hypersensitivity.

22
Available since 1999, Dermadeep has been
already used successfully for treating more than
10,000 patients worldwide and has proven to be
safe and efficient for soft-tissue
augmentation. With a four-year follow-up,
only two side-effects have been reported to
us.
23
1. Never without clarification about the risks
2. Never transmuscular 3. Never inject
under surgery 4. Fillers only in the hands of
medical professionals
  • Disinfection the area to be injected
  • Dermadeep has to be slowly injected into the
    epiperiostal layer or the hypodermis by using the
    linear withdrawing or criss-cross technique, in
    order to create a volume in the desired area by
    accumulating fragments of Acrylic Hydrogel
  • In any case, it must not be injected into the
    dermis!!!
  • Do not overcorrect
  • After the injection, massage the treated area for
    an even distribution and a perfect integration of
    the particles into the surrounding tissue
  • Respect a minimum 3 month period between two
    injection sessions

24
Hollow cheeks with Dermadeep
Before treatment
After injection
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com