Advances in Passive Seismic Attenuation Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Advances in Passive Seismic Attenuation Systems

Description:

Got some better understanding of Maraging dissipation properties, wrote paper ... Used a two blade prototype for the Maraging paper ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: RICCARDO85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Advances in Passive Seismic Attenuation Systems


1
Advances in Passive Seismic Attenuation Systems
  • Maddalena Mantovani
  • Anamaria Effler
  • Riccardo DeSalvo

2
Activities
  • Got some better understanding of Maraging
    dissipation properties, wrote paper
  • Studying seismic attenuation starting _at_ 1 Hz for
    low frequency underground interferometers to
    complement NN depression and subtraction
    techniques
  • Comparing Maraging, CuBe, and possibly metglass
    dissipation behavior.

3
Requirements
  • The Requirements for he underground ifo. are
    attenuation of 1000 at 5 Hz for multi ton
    payloads
  • Passive Horizontal attenuation is trivial
  • Vertical must drive MGAS to lower frequency
  • Refine mechanical tuning
  • Add electromagnetic (LVDT, op-amp, voice coil)
    springs in parallel to fine tune the resonant
    frequency and compensate thermal drifts

4
Means
  • Used a two blade prototype for the Maraging paper
  • Using old demo unit for developing
    electromagnetic springs and measuring transfer
    function (50 Kg payload)
  • Using the Deep Fall Back Solution prototype to
    demonstrate the multi-ton capabilities
  • Using LCGT blades to compare materials

5
Results (Maraging dissipation properties)
  • Paper
  • " Study of Quality Factor and Hysteresis
    Associated with the State-of-the-art Passive
    Seismic Isolation System for Gravitational Wave
    Interferometeric Detectors".
  • The draft is available at http//www.ligo.caltech.
    edu/htariq/ric/maraging_hysteresisLRP.pdf

6
Setup used for the paper
Click on image to start movie (15 sec)
  • The two cantilevers support the payload and,
    individually would have high resonant frequency.
  • The frequency is lowered by radially compressing
    the two springs one against the other, the two
    arches form an antispring that neutralize the
    cantilever springiness and the resonant frequency
    can be tuned at will

7
Results (Old demo unit)
  • Instrumented with the LVDT and Voice Coil.
  • Built the OpAmp coil driver circuit
  • Driven the spring to 300 mHz fully passively
  • Driven the spring to 70 mHz (attenuation 200 at 1
    Hz) with electromagnetic spring, going down
  • Studying Q factor versus frequency and found
    expected quadratic behavior with frequency,
    pointing at Q0 for f0

8
(No Transcript)
9
seconds
seconds
10
Q t n
11
Work in course (Old demo unit)
  • Further Reducing the resonant frequency
  • Ready to measure attenuation transfer functions
    (see movies)
  • Low frequency measurements take time, progress is
    slow

12
This is exciting the payload (hanging
below) Click on image to start movie (15 sec)
Load support Disk Suspension Wire Payload 50
Kg
13
And this is how we measure the transfer function,
shake the body and measure stability of
payload Click on image to start movie (15 sec)
Load support Disk (stationary) Shaking
Body Support Susp. wire Payload
14
Progress with DFBS prototype
  • This prototype was built and minimally tested 1.5
    years ago as a fall back solution to be mounted
    on piers in case HEPI failed
  • It was then mothballed
  • It comprises two blades out of 12 for a complete
    pier system
  • It is used to demonstrate multi-ton, low
    frequency payload capabilities
  • Payload 350 Kg on 2 blades

15
DFBS prototype
Bellow equivalent springs Cantilevers 350
Kg Payload
16
LIGO Bellow springs
Blade Nose bolting
17
Progress with DFBS prototype
  • Did not remove bellow springs in parallel because
    of geometry constraints of this prototype
  • Made tests in full, pier compatible configuration

18
Progress with DFBS prototype
  • So far driven down to 120 mHz despite the
    additional springs (4/3 of the equivalent bellow
    stiffness) in fully passive configuration
  • (Attenuation of 50 _at_ 1 Hz)
  • Expect 30 mHz if tuned with e.m. spring
  • Transfer function will not be possible on this
    prototype, we would need hydraulics to excite the
    frame
  • Proven on preceding prototypes that attenuation
    plateau at 1000, fully expect same performance

19
(No Transcript)
20
LIGOBellow Equivalent Springs (2x)
Frequency Tuning Compression screws
21
(No Transcript)
22
300 mHz tune
Click on image to start movie (15 sec)
23
300 mHz tune
Click on image to start movie (15 sec)
24
200 mHz tune
Click on image to start movie (15 sec)
25
150 mHz tune
Click on image to start movie (15 sec)
26
DFBS performance
  • Estimated attenuation of
  • gt70 _at_ 1Hz and above in fully passive
    configuration
  • 1000 _at_ 4 Hz fully passive configuration
  • 1000 _at_ 1 Hz semi-passive, with e.m. spring
  • Upgradeable to gtgt 1000 _at_ 1 Hz with accelerometers
    and active feed back
  • Underground interferometer specs satisfiable!
  • Natural damping makes damping unnecessary in the
    vertical direction

27
Materials comparisons
  • Mounted Maraging blade
  • Starting measurements
  • Twin CuBe spring ready
  • Waiting for Metglas material
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com