Social Stratification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Stratification

Description:

Meritocracy- social stratification based on personal merit. ... Because a pure meritocracy diminishes the importance of families and other social groupings. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:232
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: claudias6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Stratification


1
Social Stratification
  • What is Social Stratification?
  • Caste and Class Systems
  • Stratification
  • Marx
  • Weber
  • Stratification and Technology A Global
    Perspective

2
What is Social Stratification?
  • For tens of thousands of years, humans lived in
    small hunting and gathering societies. These
    bands of people show little signs of inequality.
    As societies became more complex, major changes
    came about, these changes elevated certain
    categories of the population by giving them more
    power, money, and prestige.
  • Social Stratification- a system by which a
    society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy.

3
  • 1. Social stratification is a trait of society,
    not simply a reflection of individual
    differences.
  • Children born into wealthy families are more
    likely than children born in poverty to
    experience good healthy, achieve academically,
    succeed in lifes work and live a long life.
  • 2. Social stratification persists over
    generations.
  • To see stratification as a trait of society
    rather than one of individuals, we need to only
    look at how inequality persists along
    generations. In all societies, parents pass
    their social position on to their children.
  • Social Mobility- change in ones position in the
    social hierarchy.

4
  • 3. Social stratification is universal but
    variable.
  • In some societies, inequality is mostly a matter
    of prestige in others, wealth or power is the
    key dimension of difference. More importantly
    some societies display more inequality than
    others.
  • 4. Social stratification involves not just
    inequality but beliefs.
  • Any system of inequality gives some people more
    than others and the society also defines the
    arrangements as fair.

5
Caste and Class Systems
  • A Caste System- is a social system based on
    ascription, or birth.
  • A pure caste system is closed because birth alone
    determines ones destiny, with little or no
    opportunity for social mobility based on effort.

6
  • First, traditional caste groups have specific
    occupations, so generations of a family perform
    the same type of work.
  • Second, maintaining a rigid social hierarchy
    depends on people marrying within their own
    categories mixed marriages would blur the
    ranking of children.
  • Endogamy- marriage between people of the same
    social category.
  • Third, caste norms guide people to stay in the
    company of their own kind.
  • Fourth, caste systems rest on powerful cultural
    beliefs.

7
  • Caste systems exist in agrarian societies because
    life long routines of agriculture depend on a
    rigid sense of duty and discipline.

8
The Class System
  • Class System- social stratification based on both
    birth and individual achievement.
  • The class system categorizes people according to
    their color, sex, or social background comes to
    be seen as wrong in industrial and
    post-industrial societies, and all people gain
    political rights and roughly equal standing
    before the law.
  • Meritocracy- social stratification based on
    personal merit.
  • People in industrial societies develop a broad
    range of capabilities, stratification is based on
    merit, which is the job one does and how well
    one does it.

9
  • Why do industrial and postindustrial societies
    keep castelike qualities?
  • Because a pure meritocracy diminishes the
    importance of families and other social
    groupings. Economic performance is not
    everything after all. Would we want to evaluate
    our family members solely on their jobs?
    Probably not. Therefore, class systems in
    high-income nations move toward meritocracy to
    promote productivity and efficiency but retain
    caste elements to maintain order and social
    cohesion.
  • Status consistency- the degree of consistency in
    a persons social standing across various
    dimensions of social inequality.

10
The Functions of Social Stratification
  • The structural-functional paradigm- social
    inequality plays a vital part in the operation of
    society.
  • Davis-Moore thesis- Social stratification has
    beneficial consequences of the operation of a
    society.

11
  • According to the Davis-Moore thesis, the greater
    the functional importance of a position, the more
    rewards a society attaches to it. This strategy
    promotes productivity and efficiency because
    rewarding important work with income, prestige,
    power, and leisure encourages people to do these
    jobs and to work better longer and harder.
    Unequal rewards benefit some individuals, then,
    and a system of unequal rewards benefits society
    as a whole.

12
Stratification and Conflict
  • Social-Conflict analysis argues that rather than
    benefiting society as a whole, social
    stratification provides some people with
    advantages over others. This analysis draws
    heavily on the ideas of Karl Marx, with
    contributions from Max Weber.
  • Marx saw great inequality in wealth and power
    arising from capitalism, which, he argued, made
    class conflict inevitable. In time, he believed,
    oppression and misery would drive the working
    majority to organize and ultimately overthrow
    capitalism.

13
  • Marx explained the through the family,
    opportunity and wealth are passed down from
    generation to generation. Moreover, the legal
    system defends private property and inheritance.
    Finally, elite children mix at exclusive schools,
    forging social ties that will benefit them
    throughout their lives. Capitalist society
    reproduces the class structure in each new
    generation.

14
Why No Marxist Revolution?
  • 1. The fragmentation of the capitalist class.
  • Day-to-day operations of large corporations are
    now in the hands of a managerial class, whose
    members may or may not be major stockholders.
  • 2. A higher standard of living.
  • A century ago most workers were in factories or
    on farms performing blue-collar occupations,
    lower-prestige work that involves mostly manual
    labor. Today, most workers hold white-collar
    occupations, higher-prestige work that involves
    mostly mental activity. Most of todays
    white-collar workers do not think of themselves
    as an industrial proletariat.

15
  • 3. More worker organizations.
  • Workers today have organizational clout that they
    lacked a century ago. Worker management disputes
    are settled without threatening the capitalist
    system.
  • 4. More extensive legal protections.
  • During the twentieth century, the government
    passed laws to make the workplace safer and
    developed programs such as unemployment
    insurance, disability protection and Social
    Security.

16
Max Weber Class, Status, and Power
  • Weber saw Marxs two-class model simplistic.
  • Instead, he thought social stratification
    involves three distinct dimensions of inequality.
  • The first dimension is economic inequalitythe
    issue so vital to Marxwhich Weber called class
    position. Weber did not think of classes as
    crude categories but as a continuum ranging from
    high to low. Webers second dimension of social
    stratification is status, or social prestige, and
    the third is power.

17
  • Webers view of social stratification in
    industrial societies as a multidimensional
    ranking rather than a hierarchy of clearly
    defined classes.
  • Socioeconomic status (SES)-a composite ranking
    based on various dimensions of social inequality.
  • Social stratification according to Weber is
    variable and complex.

18
Inequalities in History
  • Weber points out that each of his three
    dimensions of social inequality stands out at
    different points in the evolution of human
    societies. Agrarian societies emphasize status
    or social prestige, typically in the form of
    honor.

19
Hunting and Gathering Societies
  • With simple technology, hunters and gathers
    produce only what is necessary for day-to-day
    living. Some people may produce more than
    others, but the groups survival depends on all
    sharing what they have. Thus, no categories of
    people emerge as better off than others.

20
Horticultural, Pastoral, and Agrarian Societies
  • As technology advances create a surplus, social
    inequality increases. In horticultural and
    pastoral societies, a small elite controls most
    of the surplus. Large-scale agriculture is more
    productive still, and marked inequalityas great
    as any time in human historymeans that various
    categories of people lead strikingly different
    lives. Agrarian nobility typically exercises
    godlike power over the masses.

21
Industrial Societies
  • Industrialization turns the tide, lessening
    inequality. Prompted by the need to develop
    individual talents, meritocracy takes hold and
    erodes the power of traditional elites.
  • The specialized work performed in industrial
    societies demands schooling for all, sharply
    reducing illiteracy. A literate population, in
    turn, presses for a greater voice in political
    decision making, further diminishing social
    inequality and lessening mens domination over
    women.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com