Title: Skills in Cognitive Behaviour Counselling
1Skills in Cognitive Behaviour Counselling
PsychotherapyCHAPTER 7 Skills for working with
enduring negative patterns
- FRANK WILLS (2008)
- London SAGE
2Schemas, core beliefs and assumptions different
ways of working
- Schemas, core beliefs, assumptions and negative
automatic thoughts represent different levels of
cognition. - Different methods are required for working with
these different levels of cognition (Padesky
Greenberger, 1995). - There is overlap and continuity between the
different levels and different ways of working,
but also differences in the nature (e.g.,
oldernewer, surfacedepth) of the cognitions
being tackled.
3Schema and core beliefs
- In CBT, schema has come to be a term to
describe early maladaptive schema (Young,
1994). - Schemas are now seen as complex networks of
feeling, thinking, behaviour and physiology. They
may be very old, even pre-verbal, vague and give
direction of perception. - Schemas may have different dimensions (e.g.,
mistrust schema might have different dimensions
for men, women, young, old people, etc. - As the different dimensions of schemas become
operationalised and verbalised, they may be
represented as core beliefs e.g., I cant
trust other men to respect my feelings. - Schemas and core beliefs can be identified by
questionnaires (e.g., Young, 1994 Young
Klosko, 1993).
4Schema and core belief change
- Negative schemas tend to be vague feelings about
the self and the world. They have strong
maintenance systems and may be quite impervious
to change. It is probably best to think in terms
of chiselling them down at the same time as
trying to build alternative more positive
schemas. - Core beliefs tend to be stated in categorical and
black and white terms e.g., I am crap no
ifs, no buts! Their weak point, offering a
therapeutic target, is that they are nearly
always too constrained to accommodate all the
data that may be relevant to them. Change efforts
therefore focus on opening them out to wider
sources of data.
5Unhelpful assumptions nature and change
- Core beliefs are hard to live with even we here
in this audience cant be crap all the time! - Assumptions may therefore develop as compensatory
strategies for core beliefs e.g., If I could
get someone to love me, maybe I wouldnt feel so
crap. - They may also change form into rules of living
As long as lots of people love me, Im okay. - These rules may work for a while carry a tendency
for the holder to get hoist with his own petard
trying to make people love one may get on their
nerves! - Unhelpful assumptions easily develop into overly
rigid rules, and effort for change again
therefore centres on fostering adaptability to
more varied situations.
6Ways of modifying assumptions
- The downward-arrow technique consists of
identifying and pushing assumptions to the limit
of their credibility by asking questions like
What would be so bad about people not loving
you? This may reveal the limitation of the rule
to people and begin to loosen belief in it. - FLASHCARDS give a format for identifying where
assumptions come from, their positive and
negative (price) aspects, and offer an
alternative for the client to contemplate in
hours of rumination on the negative version.
7Assumptions flashcard
- I sometimes assume that I can only feel okay
about myself if lots of people seem to love and
approve of me. - It is understandable that I think this because
when I was younger, my parents seemed to
consistently favour my brothers and sisters over
me. - This works against me because I often try too
hard to make people love and approve of me and
sell myself cheap and get on peoples nerves
too. - The assumption is wrong because You can please
some people some of the time but you cant
please all of the people all of the time! - The best way forward for me now is To
concentrate on my life goals and realise that
some people will like what I do and some wont.
8Developing more flexible rules of living (the
example of BRUCE)
- OLD RULE
- I must not show my weak points to anyone at any
time. - NEW RULE
- It might be possible to show my weak points to
some people some times. - I can explore different ways of showing weak
points some might be better than others. - Taking the initiative sometimes could give me
more sense of control. - Taking the initiative sometimes might also lessen
the sense of dread about being found out. - (NB Notice the new rule is more variegated
than the old).
9Schema and core belief change methods
- Because schemas are so omnipresent, they
frequently show themselves in the therapeutic
relationship and so may also be worked with and
through in that context. - Schema work tends to be longer term so that the
therapy relationship becomes a key focus of
change. - There is also the need, however, to get on with
the work of therapy via specific schema-change
techniques.
10Examples of how schemas can show and be worked
through in the therapy relationship (1)
- MISTRUST SCHEMA The client wonders how he is
supposed to know how far he can trust you to
tolerate him and sets up transference tests to
test your tolerance of him (coming late,
forgetting to pay, etc.). - ENTITLEMENT SCHEMA This is often underlain by
low self-esteem. If the therapist accepts the
good part then the client will suspect her
judgement if she points out the bad part she
may be accused of being just like my mum.
11Examples of how schemas can show and be worked
through in the therapy relationship (2)
- AVOIDANT SCHEMA This may show itself by
avoidance of issues, non- or pseudo-cooperation
with agenda setting and the work of therapy. - DEPENDENT SCHEMA This may show itself by
over-compliance, exaggerated accounts of how much
the client has changed and how helpful the
therapy has been, followed by signs of distress
and/or alarm by the suggestion that therapy could
now end.
12Examples of how schemas can show and be worked
through in the therapy relationship (3)
- As discussed in Chapter 3, the first step that
the therapist needs to master is that of
unhooking herself from the schema-driven
interpersonal tangle. These transferences tests
are inherently provoking and cant be dealt with
from the hooked-in position. Supervision is
often very helpful here. - The next step is to look at how the clients
schema may be interacting with ones own it is
not unknown, for example, that therapists can
feel gratified by dependent clients. - The therapist can then develop empathy for the
clients position a good formulation should
tell us why the client has this pattern. We can
now consider whether anyone with such a history
might develop such pattern. - The next step is to formulate a non-threatening
way to raise the issue with the client so that a
therapeutic plan can be developed perhaps
including some of the methods and techniques
shown in the following slides.
13The use of continua
- The basic problem with negative client schemas is
that they only let certain types of
schema-confirming data in. - They need therefore to be stretched out and
loosened up to let in consideration of wider
factors that are likely to be more benign in
relation to the clients self-image. - Continua are visual representations of such
efforts in which the client is asked to draw a
line with an aspect of the schema (e.g., 0
worthiness) at one end and its opposite (100
worthiness) at the other end. Other people or
aspects of the clients behaviour can be placed
along this line. - The net effect seems to be to demonstrate the
fact that all of us human beings are basically
quite flawed, and realising this helps us to join
the common band of humanity We are all in this
together.
14Historical tests of a schema
- As with continua, rules and beliefs can be tested
to see how well they seem justified at different
stages of the clients history. - Because the client is currently often mired in a
bad place where their experiences seem to confirm
their negative beliefs, they may be ignoring
information about different times when this was
not the case the historical test can often
reveal this and may even reveal positive aspects
of the current situation that are being ignored.
15Positive diaries, psychodrama and schema debates
- Positive diaries focus on collecting and writing
down positive aspects of the clients past and
current life that are being forgotten. Negative
bias in memory and attention is counteracted by
the purposeful act of writing and then
re-reading. - Psychodrama is a form of role-play in which
negative previous experiences can be re-run with
different types of outcome and interventions
penned in. - Schema debate is a form of role-play in which the
client can gain practice from reflecting on how
the negative voice of the schema is most
effectively opposed.