Welcome to ERS/ENVISAT Symposium - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Welcome to ERS/ENVISAT Symposium

Description:

To provide working level coordination of international RF spectrum usage among ... (BRA), INSA(SPA), ISRO(IND), JAXA(JAP), KARI(KOR), NASA(USA), NIVR(NED), NOAA(USA) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: ESAE9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welcome to ERS/ENVISAT Symposium


1
The Space Frequency Coordination
Group (SFCG) ESF Workshop Cagliari, 29
October, 2004
2
What is the SFCG
  • The SFCG is an informal group federating all the
    main space agencies and related national and
    international organizations.
  • Its main objectives are
  • To provide working level coordination of
    international RF spectrum usage among the science
    services users.
  • To adopt agreements that optimise the use of the
    allocated bands.
  • To agree common policies and identify long-term
    targets related to potential changes to the
    international regulations (ITU-R, WRC, Regional
    Groups).
  • Note The second part of this presentation will
    concentrate on the last topic only

3
The SFCG scope
  • The radio services covered by the SFCG activity
    are
  • Space Research (data communications and sensors)
  • Space Operations
  • Earth Exploration Satellite (data communications
    and sensors)
  • Meteorological Satellite
  • Inter-Satellite
  • It is therefore clear that
  • Passive sensing is only one (important) element
    of the SFCG activity
  • Passive sensing not from satellite is not within
    the SFCG scope, but the presence as observer of
    an organisation like IUCAF has proven very
    beneficial.

4
SFCG history and membership
  • SFCG was founded 24 years ago under ESA and NASA
    initiative. Since then it has regularly met each
    year.
  • The 24 SFCG member agencies are ASI (ITA),
    BNSC(UK), CAST(CHI), CMA(CHI), CNES(FRA),
    CONAE(ARG), CSA(CAN), CSIRO(AUS), DLR(GER), ESA,
    EUMETSAT, INPE(BRA), INSA(SPA), ISRO(IND),
    JAXA(JAP), KARI(KOR), NASA(USA), NIVR(NED),
    NOAA(USA), NSA(MAL), NSAU(UKR), NSPO(TW),
    SSC(SWE), RFSA(RUS).
  • The Observers are WMO, IUCAF, ITWG, CCSDS,
    ITU-R.
  • The Head of the ESA Frequency Management Office
    has the task of permanent SFCG Executive
    Secretary.
  • Further information on SFCG can be found at
    http//www.sfcgonline.org/ .

5
SFCG working methods
  • The yearly meetings of SFCG are hosted on a
    rotation basis by one of the member agencies and
    have a duration of 7 working days.
  • The work is driven by an agenda and a set of
    action items agreed at the previous meeting, but
    the informal nature of the group allows the
    introduction of any new subject of interest.
  • As a result of its work, the SFCG develops and
    adopts common resolutions and recommendations to
    be applied within the member agencies. These
    cover a variety of subjects, e.g. spectrum
    masks, deep-space channels plans, inter-agency
    frequency coordination procedures, interference
    criteria, standard transponder turnaround
    frequency ratios, use of specific bands, common
    objectives wrt the next WRC, etc.

6
Some of the SFCG achievements in the passive
sensing area
  1. Successful world-wide agreement by the satellite
    passive sensing community on the requirements for
    the revision of passive allocations above 71 GHz
    (WRC-2000). This proved decisive in convincing
    the national delegations that our requirements
    were scientifically and technically sound.
  2. Successful world-wide agreement on the
    requirements for the revision of the
    EESS(passive) allocations in the 50-60 GHz range
    (WRC-97). Same considerations as under point 1.
  3. Global revision of the satellite passive sensors
    protection criteria, that resulted in the
    revision of the corresponding ITU Recommendations
    in 2002
  4. Agreement on the mechanisms to coordinate the
    future cloud radar missions at 94 GHz with the
    radioastronomy operations (SFCG Resolution 24-2)
  5. In general SFCG is effective in raising early
    alarm bells when one of the members discovers
    regulatory evolutions that may have impacts on
    the community

7
The SFCG international recognition
Although the SFCG is an informal group, its
positions on regulatory aspects have an impact on
the decision makers. Its Resolution covering the
SFCG position on the various WRC Agenda Items is
widely known and used as a lobbying tool. The
fact of representing a contact point to reach the
whole satellite science service community is seen
as a key element by the regulators. For example
the SFCG, despite being an informal group, has
been tasked by WRC-03 to act as the reference
point for collecting information on the orbital
parameters of future missions flying SAR sensors
in P-band (432-438 MHz). CITEL has recently
expressed interest in having SFCG attending their
meetings as observer.
8
The SFCG limitations
  • SFCG is an informal group. As such
  • it doesnt have full authority to speak on
    behalf of a community
  • it doesnt have staff that could work full time
    also outside the meeting dates and attend
    international meetings representing SFCG.
  • Some of the SFCG member agencies are bound to
    policy decisions taken by their national
    regulatory authority and therefore these members
    cannot always support the SFCG positions when
    attending ITU meetings as part of their national
    delegation. The case of UWB at 24 GHz is
    exemplary in this context, with NASA and NOAA not
    being allowed to express their view at ITU level.
  • The SFCG and, more in general, the
    representatives of passive services, have not
    been able to be heard at all in some areas (e.g.
    the European Commission, certain regional groups
    like the Arab Group)

9
How can SFCG improve its effectiveness
  • Making its voice heard also in those areas not
    reached yet. A wider and targeted dissemination
    of the SFCG outputs could be beneficial.
  • It would be important to identify similar groups
    with common interests to exchange information on
    policies. For example we do not know how
    terrestrial passive sensing users are organised.
  • The availability of SFCG staff would surely help
    a lot in attending regional meetings, breaking
    into areas where our community is not well known
    and keeping contacts with other groups with
    common interests (e.g CRAF, IUCAF, etc..). But
    this presents economical and organisational
    problems and may result in a less informal
    operating mode. Therefore this may not represent
    a viable way forward.
  • This Workshop could represent an opportunity to
    tackle some of these limitations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com