Title: REACT: Austrian Case Studies
1REACT Austrian Case Studies
- Christian Rakos
- Energieverwertungsagentur
2The case studies
- The success of biomass district heating
- The success of wood pellet heating
- The development of biodiesel
- Green electricity legislation and its impacts
- Regional development of medium scale biomass
heating projects - The Salzburg residential subsidy scheme
3Biomass use for district heating of villages
- Central heating plant for entire village 500 kW
- 30 MW - energy distribution via hot water pipes
- since 1980 750 plants
- based on local initiative
- supported by investment subsidies (40-50)
4Success factors for bioenergy development in
district heating
- Technology components available from forest
industry applications - Bottom up movement of rural communities
- Support by regional politics
- Establishment of regional technology managers
- (agricultural) subsidies (50 of investment)
5Trends in district heating with biomass
Smaller plants (lt 800 kW)
Larger plants (gt800 kW)
6Problems with biomass district heating
- Establishment of counterproductive traditions of
planning (e.g. overdimensioning) - serious lack of quality of planning
- quality problems also in grid design and
construction - lack of attention to cost minimisation
- lack of professional know how of operators
- lack of monitoring quality controll
7Solutions for problems
- Establishment of technical standards (ÖKL
Merkblatt 67) - Training of planners plant operators
- Success limited
- New approach establishment of comprehensive
quality management system (under way) - Continuous monitoring benchmarking of plants
8Lessons learned
- Make sure technical complexity quality receives
enough attention - RD policies usually fail to address these most
important issues (not sophisticated) - Institutional support critical (quality!)
- Financial support critical (reliability!)
9Pellet boilers for domestic heating in single
family houses
- 10 - 30 kW
- automatic feeding, ignition and ash removal
- gt 90 efficiency
- very low emissionsapprox.50 mg CO / m3
10 Anually installed automatic wood boilers lt 100 kW
11Success factors for domestic pellet boilers
- Long term competition between producers of
woodchip boilers created by BLT testing site - Focused competition for small scale chip boilers
- emergence of pellets
- booming consumer interest
- subsidies
12Emissions of wood boilers for domestic use
13Problems of pellet boiler introduction
- Lack of knowledge and resistance among fitters
(installers) - quality problems of boilers and pellets
- pellet supply infrastructures
- boiler service infrastructures
14How were problems solved ?
- Problems with installers
- Sales always via installers
- Installer trainings by boiler producer
- Bioheat installer trainings by biomass
association - Boiler pellet quality
- Solved by industry (essential for market
success!) - Standards tracking system for pellets
- Standards for delivery storage (!!)
- Infrastructures for boiler maintenance pellet
supply - Solved by industry (essential for market success)
- Pellet logistics by existing transport companies
fuel dealers
15Encoding of pellets
Production-batch Excludes mixing with cheap or
low quality products In case of damages find the
responisble party Verify date of production
- Pellet producer
- verifiable mass flux from the producer to the
consumer - no anonymous mass product
- support local producers
National quality label Austrian Pellet
Association
16Lessons learned
- Technology development is long term process
significant mid term impacts only with existing
technology! - Delivery of quality products and services is key
to success public action is essential to
enforce consistent quality - Competition excellent driver for quality
- Comfort and consumer appeal key market drivers
- Existence of subsidies important for kick off
17Development of small contracting businesses via
dedicated consultants
18The success story of Regionalenergie Steiermark
- Small consulting company dedicated to supporting
farmers in setting up small biomass heat
businesses - Financed by state and forest owners association
- Offers complete start up support
- Client contacts
- Feasibility study
- Technical, financial legal advice for business
startup - General marketing for bioenergy
- gt 100 projects realised since 1994
19Lessons learned
- Small projects can be more economic than large
ones - Lower subsidies but better advice - a cost
effective solution for supporting RES - Keep it small and simple
- Local value added can be a reality in that case
20The Salzburg residential building subsidy
The existing system of subsidies for residential
buildings was modified
21Market share of biomass heating in new
residential buildings in Salzburg
22Market share of solar thermal collectors in new
residential buildings in Salzburg
23Stieglgründe - a showcase of sustainable
architecture by Schwarzenbacher
128 flats 9000 m2 pellets boiler 2x150 kW Solar
380 m2 Investment solar biomass 80/m2 Total
costs 1708 /m2 Annual fuel costs 150
Contact architekten_at_archsolar.at
24Lessons learned
- Look for existing subsidies and change the terms
of reference - This way oversubsidising can be realised
leading to full scale market transformation - At a certain point a new market standard is
created changes become permanent - Technology is available for 100 sustainable
residential heating at NO relevant cost
disadvantage
25BIODIESEL
- Pioneering role of Austria
- In process technology
- In plant deployment
- In engine testing and obtaining warranties from
major tractor and car producers - In standardisation
- Model of local small scale biodiesel production
only in 1 case sucessful (low oil prices) - Sufficient large scale plants for 2 biofuels,
focus on used vegetable oil - Limited sucess on Austrian market (low diesel
taxation) most biodiesel is exported
26Lessons learned
- Success in technology base due to comprehensive
approach (strategic niche management) - Involvement of professional mineral oil
researchers in standardisation - Lack of marketing skills and supporting
legislation very small local market - Industry platform very important and
undersupported - A hint to other contries do not reinvent the
wheel! Use proven technology, logistic solutions
etc. developed over 30 years
27Green Electricity Legislation in Austria
- Permanently changing framework
- 1998 liberalisation law RES E responsiblity of
provinces 9 different regulations based on feed
in tarifs - 2000 Green certificates and quota system for
small hydropower - 2002 uniform RES E regulation on national level
- 2003 fixed feed in tarifs
- 2004 3 months of unclear financing of feed in
tarifs - Present system under heavy industry attac
- Valid for plants to start with al permits by end
2004 and operation by mid 2006
28Results
- Lots of insecurity little development till 2003
- As fixed tarifs in 2003 were published overheated
market ! - 2003 260 MW wind developed
- Large scale biomass developement fuel supply
serious issue, tendency towards condensing power
! - Lack of attention to local residents resistance
against projects - Suspense 2004 very negative for confidence in
market - NO GOOD EXAMPLE in terms of continuity!
29Lessons learned
- Harmonised approach better than localised
approach - Green Certificates full failure!
- No trade !
- Certificates bought together with electricity
- Concentration of demand and supply
- High feed in tarifs have a masive impact on
market development - Different lead times of technologies ! Wind much
faster than biomass
30Lessons learned II
- Limited duration of support scheme in principle
reasonable - Too short time for operation start up (6/2006)
- Overheating of market
- Price increases from equipment manufacturers
- No time for participative decision making