Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density Estimation Methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density Estimation Methods

Description:

at Stony Brook. S.Towers. All kernal PDF estimation methods (PDE's) are developed from a simple idea... If a data point lies in a region where clustering of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: smjt5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density Estimation Methods


1
Overview of Non-Parametric Probability Density
Estimation Methods
  • Sherry Towers
  • State University of New York
  • at Stony Brook

2
  • All kernal PDF estimation methods (PDEs) are
    developed from a simple idea
  • If a data point lies in a region where
    clustering of signal MC is tight, and bkgnd MC is
    loose, the point is likely to be signal

3
  • To estimate a PDF, PDEs use the idea that any
    continuous function can be modelled by sum of
    some kernal function
  • Gaussian kernals are a good choice for particle
    physics
  • So, a PDF can be estimated by sum of
    multi-dimensional Gaussians centred about MC
    generated points

4

5
  • Best form of Gaussian kernal is a matter of
    debate
  • Static-kernal PDE method uses a kernal with
    covariance matrix obtained from entire sample
  • The Gaussian Expansion Method (GEM), uses an
    adaptive kernal the covariance matrix used for
    the Gaussian at each MC point comes from local
    covariance matrix.

6

7
GEM vs Static-Kernal PDE
  • GEM gives unbiased estimate of PDF, but slower to
    use because local covariance must be calculated
    for each MC point
  • Static-kernal PDE methods have smaller variance,
    and are faster to use, but yield biased estimates
    of the PDF

8
Comparison of GEM and static-kernal PDE

9
PDE vs Neural Networks
  • Both PDEs and Neural Networks can take into
    account non-linear correlations in parameter
    space
  • Both methods are, in principle, equally powerful
  • For most part they perform similarly in an
    average analysis

10
PDE vs Neural Networks
  • But, PDEs have far fewer parameters, and
    algorithm is more intuitive in nature (easier to
    understand)

11

Plus, PDE estimate of PDF can be visually
examined

12
PDEs vs Neural Nets
  • There are some problems that are particularly
    well suited to PDEs

13
PDEs vs Neural Nets

14
PDEs vs Neural Nets

15
PDEs vs Neural Nets

16
Summary
  • PDE methods are as powerful as neural networks,
    and offer an interesting alternative
  • Very few parameters, easy to use, easy to
    understand, and yield unbinned estimate of PDF
    that user can examine in the multidimensional
    parameter space!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com