CEBS Role, Programme and Challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

CEBS Role, Programme and Challenges

Description:

Supervisory Review Process (Pillar II) Reporting requirements ... Basel II and CEBS. The new paradigm: risk-focused supervision ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: fmgL
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CEBS Role, Programme and Challenges


1
CEBS Role, Programme and Challenges
  • José María Roldán 23 May 2005

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Basel II and CEBS
  • Four challenges
  • What is CEBS?
  • Role and tasks
  • Lamfalussy framework
  • Work Programme
  • Supervisory Disclosure
  • Supervisory Review Process (Pillar II)
  • Reporting requirements
  • Supervision of cross-border groups
  • Consultation process
  • Future work

3
Introduction
  • Basel II and CEBS
  • The new paradigm risk-focused supervision
  • A window of opportunity for convergence in
    supervisory practices in the EU the role of CEBS
  • Implementation of Basel and the Capital
    Requirements Directive
  • Four main challenges in EU implementation
  • Consistency
  • Convergence in supervisory practices
  • Streamlining the supervisory process for
    cross-border groups
  • Effective consultations

4
CEBS - Role and tasks
  • Established in Nov 2003, the first meeting Jan
    2004
  • High level representatives from the banking
    supervisory authorities and central banks of the
    European Union, including the European Central
    Bank
  • 25 countries and 46 member organisations,
    observers from EEA countries, the European
    Commission and the Banking Supervision Committee
    of ESCB (European System for Central Banks)
  • Chairman Vice Chair Secretary General José
    María Roldán Danièle Nouy Andrea Enria Banco
    de España Commission de Bancaire Banca dItalia
    Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway

5
CEBS - Role and tasks
  • to advise the European Commission on banking
    policy issues, in particular for the preparation
    of draft measures for the implementation of
    European legislation
  • to foster a common day to day implementation and
    application of Community legislation by issuing
    guidelines, recommendations and standards
  • to promote supervisory co-operation and provide
    for the exchange of supervisory information

6
Lamfalussy framework

Legislation
Implementing details
Convergence
EBC European Banking Committee EIOPC European
Insurance and Occupational Pensions Committee
ESC European Securities Committee FCC
Financial Conglomerates Committee CEIOPS
Committee of European Insurance and Occupational
Pensions Supervisors CESR Committee of European
Securities Regulators
¹ Finance ministries ² Supervisors and Central
Banks³ Supervisors
7
Accountability

8
Work Programme
  • Priority areas of work
  • Regulatory advice to the Commission
  • Cross-border mergers in banking
  • Deposit guarantee schemes
  • Own funds E-money
  • Convergence of supervisory practice
  • Supervisory Review Process (Pillar 2)
  • Validation of IRB and AMA systems
  • External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs)
  • Harmonisation of reporting requirements
  • Supervisory disclosure
  • Co-operation and information exchange
  • Supervision of cross-border groups (home-host)
  • Crisis management (joint with the BSC)
  • Information exchange
  • Other areas of work
  • Risks to banking stability
  • Outsourcing
  • Internal governance
  • Impact of IFRS on prudential requirements
  • The role of the audit function for prudential
    supervision
  • Cross-sectoral issues
  • Supervision of financial conglomerates
  • Off-shore financial centres
  • Delivered products
  • Advice national discretions (work continues),
    prudential filters
  • Consultation papers consultation practices,
    outsourcing, supervisory review process, common
    reporting, supervisory disclosure, financial
    reporting.

9
Expert groups

10
The first challenge
  • Consistent implementation
  • The issue
  • Complex framework risk of differences in
    national implementation
  • Additional layers of regulation at the national
    level (gold-plating)
  • National discretions
  • Lack of visibility for the common EU rules and
    practices
  • CEBS response
  • Allowing for meaningful comparisons of national
    implementation the draft guidelines on
    supervisory disclosure
  • Reducing the scope for national discretions, also
    in relation to their expected impact

11
Supervisory Disclosure
  • Supervisors are required to publish (CRD Art.
    144)
  • Rules and guidance
  • How options and national discretions are
    exercised
  • Supervisory review and evaluation
  • Statistical data on national banking sectors
  • Easy access and meaningful comparison ? peer
    group pressure
  • Internet access via CEBS website www.c-ebs.org
  • Links to national websites
  • Comparable information
  • Common language - English

12
Supervisory Disclosure
13
Supervisory Disclosure
14
National Discretions
  • The advice to the Commission cutting down on
    numbers
  • The dialogue with the industry identifying high
    impact discretions and options
  • The work on supervisory convergence
  • Discipline via supervisory disclosure
  • Open question
  • Effectiveness of market pressure and soft tools

15
The second challenge
  • Convergence in practices
  • The issue
  • Potentially different approaches to the
    supervisory review process (Pillar 2)
  • Very technical aspects of the new framework
    possibility of different criteria being used in
    supervisory assessment of internal measures of
    risk
  • Compliance burden for cross-border groups,
    especially in relation to supervisory reporting
  • CEBS response
  • Guidelines for the supervisory review process
  • Common quantitative and qualitative criteria for
    the validation of internal approaches for credit
    and operational risk
  • Common reporting requirements

16
Supervisory Review Process
  • Objectives of Pillar 2 are to
  • Ensure institutions have adequate capital to
    support all risks in their business
  • Encourage institutions to manage risk
  • Foster an active dialogue between institutions
    and supervisors
  • Covers the relationship between
  • Supervisors SREP (the Supervisory Review and
    Evaluation Process) and
  • Institution ICAAP (the Internal Capital Adequacy
    Assessment Process).

17
Supervisory Review Process
  • First consultation paper
  • ICAAP the responsibility of the institution
  • Dialogue between the institution and the
    supervisory authority in the ICAAP/SREP process
  • Proportionality
  • Second consultation paper
  • Interaction between ICAAP and SREP
  • Internal governance
  • Guidance for small institutions
  • Further work on specific issues (concentration
    risk, stress testing, interest rate risk in the
    banking book)

18
Supervisory Review Process
19
Validation
  • Validation
  • Development of quantitative and qualitative
    requirements for discrimination and calibration
    of rating systems, estimates of PDs, LGDs, EADs
    and AMA parameters.
  • Minimum standards for the review of the
    methodologies applied by credit institutions and
    investment firms.

20
Reporting requirements
  • Common reporting of the solvency ratio and
    financial data
  • Common templates and technology platform, to
    achieve
  • Level playing field
  • Less administrative burden for cross-border
    groups (while limiting the burden for small,
    local banks)
  • Easier exchanges of information between
    supervisors
  • Open questions
  • Degree of detail in CEBS guidelines how to
    strike the right balance?
  • Overall reporting burden

21
The third challenge
  • Streamlining the supervisory process
  • The issue
  • Misalignment between legal and operational
    structure of cross-border groups
  • Possible impact on compliance costs, if
    supervisory controls are duplicated or even
    conflicting
  • Role of the consolidating supervisor in the
    proposed CRD
  • CEBS response
  • Enhanced co-operation and exchange of information
    between home and host authorities
  • Clear ex ante agreements on the division of
    labour and interaction between the authorities
    involved in the supervision of a group (notion of
    significance)
  • Guidance on the approval process for validation
    of IRB and AMA
  • Road testing

22
Streamlining the supervisory process
  • Open questions
  • Delegation of tasks/responsibilities
  • Conflicting views (e.g., significance,
    distribution of capital)
  • Crisis management

23
The fourth challenge effective consultation
  • Consultation with the industry, market
    participants and end-users
  • Objectives transparency, benefit from expertise
    of market participants and end-users, dialogue
    and interaction
  • Tools public consultation on CEBS products,
    Consultative panel
  • Consultative Panel composed of 19 members with
    main task of acting as a sounding board in
    strategic issues

The industry,market participantsand end-users
CEBS
Standards, guidelines and recommendations
24
Consultative Panel
  • Expresses views on CEBS work programme
  • Comments on the way in which CEBS is exercising
    its role and, in particular, on the adequacy of
    consultation with market actors, consumers and
    end-users
  • Assists CEBS in setting priorities
  • Alerts CEBS to regulatory inconsistencies in
    the Single Market and suggests areas for Level-3
    work
  • Informs CEBS on major financial market
    developments.

25
Future Work
  • Next steps on consistent implementation and
    convergence of practices
  • Compendium or guidebook of standards, guidelines,
    advice and other work of CEBS
  • For supervisors and market participants
  • Flexible, internet based structure, easy to
    update
  • Consistent terminology, definitions
  • Common European approach and supervisory
    culture

26
Question time
  • Any questions?
  • Thank you!

27
Contact details José María Roldán
josemaria.roldan_at_c-ebs.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com