Analysis of Brighton Town Government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis of Brighton Town Government

Description:

Thesis: The effectiveness of a representative democracy in Brighton Town ... Schwartz, D. Email to Tom Lowe, Brighton Commissioner of Public Works. 30. Dec. 2006. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: skid
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis of Brighton Town Government


1
Analysis of Brighton Town Government
December 2006
Danny Schwartz Democracy Inaction Professor
Michael Arnush
2
Effectiveness of Brighton Town Government
  • Thesis The effectiveness of a representative
    democracy in Brighton Town government is
    evidenced by the opportunities for citizen
    participation and the process by which citizens
    are involved with decision making for the benefit
    of the community.

3
History of Brighton Town Government
  • Established 1814
  • First town meeting elected government officials
  • Williams, Helen. Sesquicentennial History of the
    Town of Brighton 1814 - 1964. New York The
    sesquicentennial committee 1965.
  • Today all members of Town Board are Democrats.
  • Democratic town officials continuously elected
    for the past 17 years.

4
Demographics of Town of Brighton, NY
  • Location Brighton is a southeastern suburb of
    Rochester, NY
  • County of Monroe
  • Population approximately 35,588 residents.
  • Median household income 52,066
  • Racial mix
  • Caucasian 86.1
  • Asian 8.1
  • African American 3.7
  • Hispanic 2.3
  • Native American 0.1
  • Census Demographic Profile Highlights. 2000.
    Brighton town, Monroe County, New York.
    American FactFinder. 2000. Bureau of the
    Census. 7 November 2006. lthttp//factfinder.cen
    sus.gov/servletgt


5
Brighton Town Government
Brighton pamphlet. Supervisor Office. 2006
6
Citizen Participation
  • Voting for town officials
  • 8 volunteer citizen boards
  • Town Board meetings are very accessible to
    citizens
  • Live broadcast on local channel 12
  • Citizens can attend meetings
  • Use of AIM or call in during meetings
  • Unlimited amount of time to speak at open forum

7
The McMansion Issue
VS.
McMansion Power !
NIMBY NOT IN MY BACKYARD!
8
McMansion issue Decision making process
Residents voice concerns to Town Board Town Board
creates Task Force February 2006 Demolition
Moratorium issued to halt further building
demolitions Town meetings and open forums held to
inform public of issue and allow for citizen
comments Citizen comments incorporated into
drafts for demolition regulations and site
plans July 2006 Town Board adopted new
regulations for addressing demolition of homes
and site plan approval for construction of new
homes First draft of Zoning amendments prepared
by Task Force October 2006 draft presented for
public review at Town meeting Task Force to
review citizen comments and prepare second draft
for vote by Town Board Amendments will be
incorporated into building code
9
Can we consider Brighton to be an effective
democracy?
  • Organized legislative body
  • Competent leader with limited power
  • Equal opportunity citizen participation
  • Voluntary action
  • Means for keeping citizens well informed

10
Limitation to effective democracy in Brighton
  • Citizen participation impact on legislation can
    not be objectively measured
  • Voluntary participation results in small number
    of citizens attending meetings and providing
    input compared to total town population and

11
Citizen participation and impact on legislation
Brighton compared to Saratoga Springs and Athens
  • Saratoga Springs
  • Representative democracy
  • Citizen boards, city council meetings and monthly
    town hall meetings
  • Limited time to speak in council meetings
  • City council passes legislation
  • Ancient Athens
  • Direct democracy
  • Assembly members citizens vote directly on
    legislation
  • Limited definition of citizen
  • Small segment of population makes decisions for
    all

12
Conclusion
  • Modern day democracy in Brighton, NY has roots
    in the process of ancient Athens
  • McMansion issue demonstrates citizen and
    government interacting to make decisions for
    community
  • Brighton has characteristics of an effective
    democracy
  • Limitations to effectiveness
  • May not be possible to achieve a completely
    effective democracy

13
Works Cited
  • A Demolition and Site Plan Review Local Law.
    2006.
  • 24 Oct. 2006.
  • lthttp//www.townofbrighton.org/teardownfinal.htm
    gt
  • Boards and Commisions. 2006. 19 Nov. 2006.
    lthttp//www.townofbrighton.org/boards.htmgt
  • Census Demographic Profile Highlights 2000.
    Brighton town, Monroe County, New York.
    American FactFinder. 2000.
  • Bureau of the Census. 7 November 2006.
    lthttp//factfinder.census.gov/servletgt.
  • Making democracy work. The World Book
    Encyclopedia D Volume 5. Chicago World Book
    Inc 2006.
  • Morrell, Alan. Brighton Curbs McMansions
    Rochester Democrat Chronicle. July 27 2006
    1A, 2A. Newsbank Inc. 4 Nov. 2006.
    lthttp//nl.newbank.comgt
  • Pamphlet-Town of Brighton-Supervisor office 2006.

14
Works Cited (cont)
  • Robinson, E.W., ed. Ancient Greek Democracy
    Readings and Sources. Oxford Blackwell, 2004.
  • Schwartz, D. Email to City of Saratoga Mayor
    Valerie Keehn. November 2006.
  • Schwartz, D. Personal Interview with James Vogel,
    Brighton Town Councilperson. November 2006.
  • Schwartz, D. Personal Interview with Sandra
    Frankel, Brighton Town Supervisor. November
    2006.
  • Schwartz, D. Email to James Vogel, Brighton Town
    Councilperson. 30.
  • Dec. 2006.
  • Schwartz, D. Email to Tom Lowe, Brighton
    Commissioner of Public Works. 30. Dec. 2006.
  • Williams, Helen. Sesquicentennial History of the
    Town of Brighton 1814- 1964. New
    York The sesquicentennial committee 1965.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com