Longitudinal polarization of ? and?? in DIS at COMPASS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Longitudinal polarization of ? and?? in DIS at COMPASS

Description:

Longitudinal polarization of and in DIS is sensitive to: s(x), s(x) ... production in DIS, quark fragmentation. Spin transfer from polarized quark. Quark fragmentation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: wwwcomp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Longitudinal polarization of ? and?? in DIS at COMPASS


1
Longitudinal polarization of ? and?? in DIS at
COMPASS
  • M.G.Sapozhnikov
  • Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna
  • On behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration

2
Physical motivation
  • Longitudinal polarization of ? and ?? in DIS is
    sensitive to
  • s(x), ?s(x)
  • polarization of strange quarks ?s
  • ? spin structure

3
? production in DIS, quark fragmentation

Quark fragmentation
? spin structure
Spin transfer from polarized muon
Spin transfer from polarized quark
4
Spin transfer from polarized quark to ?
Polarized quarks, indeed, transfer the
polarization to ?.
5
COMPASS Detector
SAS
Muon filter 2
MWPCs
ECal2 HCal2
LAS
SM2
Muon filter 1
ECal1 HCal1
GEM MWPCs SciFi
RICH
Drift. Ch.
SM1
Silicon SciFi
GEM MWPCs
Scintillating fibers
GEM Straws
Beam
Micromegas
Polarized target
160 GeV µ beam 2.8 . 108 µ/spill (4.8 s)
Pb -0.76?0.04 - 2003 Pb -0.80?0.04 - 2004
6
Polarized 6LiD target
7
Production of ?(??)

No PID used
8
Event selection
?
V1
p
V2
?
?

q
?-
  • Primary vertex in the target
  • Secondary vertex 5 cm downstream the
    target
  • pT gt 23 MeV/c
  • ? lt 0.01 rad
  • Q2 gt1 (GeV/c)2
  • 0.2ltylt0.9

9
Invariant mass distribution ? / ??
10
Comparison with other experiments
N(?) N(??)
E665 750 650
NOMAD 8 087 649
HERMES, 1996-2000 7 300 1 687
RHIC 30 000 24 000
COMPASS, 2003,2004 70 000 42 000
11
  • ?
  • ltxBjgt 0.05
  • ltxFgt 0.23
  • ltygt 0.46
  • ltQ2gt3.31 GeV2

12
  • ??
  • ltxBjgt 0.050
  • ltxFgt 0.22
  • ltygt 0.48
  • ltQ2gt3.27 GeV2

13
Longitudinal polarization PL
  • ?(-)0.642 0.013 - ?(??) decay parameter
  • P - polarization vector
  • k - unit vector along the decay proton momentum
  • L-axis - along the momentum of virtual
  • photon

14
  • Determination of the angular distribution
  • sidebands subtraction ss

15
  • Angular distributions of ? and ??
  • 2004 run
  • P(K0)0.0110.005

16
  • ? - between virtual photon and p in ? c.m.s.
  • Kaon background is important at large cos?
  • cut
  • -1 lt cos? lt0.6

17
Angular acceptance
unpolarized distribution by HERMES
18
Longitudinal spin transfer DLL
DLL - polarization of the struck quark along
the axis L is transferred to the ? along the
secondary axis L In our case LL

PL DLL Pb D(y)
Pb beam polarization, D(y) depolarization
factor
19
Comparison of ? and ?? x
DLL(?)? DLL(??)
  • DLL(?) -0.012 0.047 0.024
  • DLL(??) 0.249 0.056 0.049

20
Comparison of ? and ?? xF
21
Comparison with other experiments ?
22
Comparison with other experiments ??
23
PL dependence on the target polarization
?P P--P -0.03?0.04, ?
-0.01?0.05, ??
24
Polarization of ? from quark fragmentation
Spin transfer from polarized muon
Spin transfer from polarized quark
25
Polarization of ? PT 0
26
DLL(??) gt DLL(?)
Even if s(x)?s(x), DLL(??) gt DLL(?) due to
difference of the denominator Du,d(?) gt
Du,d(??)
  • Independent quark fragmentation
  • DLL(??) gt DLL(?)
  • Sensitivity to s(x)
  • Are these conclusions still valid in a more
    advanced model?

27
Theory predictions for ? and??
  • J.Ellis et al., Eur.Phys.J. C52 (2007) 603

28
Theory predictions for ? and??
  • J.Ellis et al., Eur.Phys.J. C52 (2007) 603

29
Sensitivity to the strange distribution s(x)
CTEQ5L
GRV98
DLL(s)0, BJ model
DLL(s)0, SU(6) model
30
CTEQ5L
  • Influence to different PDFs
  • Q2 4 GeV2

GRV98LO
31
Sensitivity to the strange distribution ?s(x)
CTEQ5L
GRV98
DLL(?s)0, BJ model
DLL(?s)0, SU(6) model
32
Conclusions
  • Production ? and ?? is mainly due to
    fragmentation of target remnant and u,d-quarks
  • Spin transfer to ? and ?? is mainly due to
    interaction with strange quark and antiquark

33
Conclusions-2
  • Data on the spin transfer to ? and ?? could be
    used for the independent determination of s(x)
    and ?s(x)
  • Determination of the spin transfer dependence on
    the target polarization allows to fixed ?s(x) and
    ??s(x)

34
Conclusions-3
  • Preliminary results on ? and ?? spin transfer in
    DIS are obtained on statistics 70000 ? and 42000
    ??
  • SX(?)? SX(??)
  • SX(?) 0
  • SX(??) may be as large as 0.4-0.5
  • Comparison with theory
  • Spin transfer to ?? is sensitive to ?s(x)
  • data need more s(x) than the GRV98

35
Backup slides
36
Impact of LEP data
D. de Florian, M.Stratmann, W.Vogelsang, PRD
57(1998)5811
1- SU(6) 2 BJ 3 - ?u? ?d? ?s?
37
Theory predictions for ?/??
  • Liang Zuo-tang et al. Phys.Rev.D72 (2005) 033006

-0.6 0 0.6 xF
38
Transverse polarization PY
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com