Title: Web Accessibility, the Law and Education
1Web Accessibility, the Law and Education
- Martin Sloan
- Email martin.sloan_at_brodies.co.uk
- Trainee Solicitor
- Brodies WS, Edinburgh
- Techshare 2002, Birmingham
- 21 November 2002
2Web accessibility and the SENDA
- What is Web Accessibility?
- The basis of the legal argument
- Special Educational Needs Act 2001
- e-learning
- Summary and Final Thoughts
3What is Web Accessibility?
- Original concept of the Internet
- Platform Independent
- Universal
- Method of sharing information irrespective of
disability - Erosion of these principles
- Proprietary technologies
4Web Accessibility Initiative
- World Wide Web Consortium (W3) Web Accessibility
Initiative (WAI) - Designed to promote good design practice
- But low awareness
- Legal argument
5Isnt Education Exempt?
- Excluded from Part III of the Disability
Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA) by s.19(5) - However Part III still applies to Ancillary
Services - For example student unions, catering, lecture
theatres - The Public Aspects including Web sites
6The Act and its Obligations
- Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- a universal, all embracing right of
non-discrimination against disabled
peopleapplicable to all providers of goods,
facilities and services to the general public - Minister for Social Security and Disabled People,
- Hansard, H.C. Standing Committee E col. 290
7The Act and its Obligations
- Part III introduced on 1 October 1999
- Code of Practice (the Code)
- fleshes out the Act
- Provides guidance
- Aims to avoid legal action
- Not an authorative statement of the law
- Does mention Web Accessibility
8Who is a Service Provider?
- Not defined in either the Act or the Code
- Non-exhaustive examples listed
- access to and use of information services
- Drafted in pre-Internet era
- Act explicitly includes free services
9Discrimination Defined
- s.20 A provider of services discriminates against
a disabled person if - For a reason which relates to the disabled
persons disability, he treats him less
favourably than he treats or would treat others
to whom that reason does not apply and - he cannot show that the treatment in question is
justified
10Duties under the Act
- s.19(1)
- not to refuse to provide or deliberately not
provide any service which he provides or is
prepared to provide to the public - to comply with any s.21 duty to make reasonable
adjustments
11Refusal to Provide a Service
- Where a Service Provider has deliberately chosen
not to make his site accessible - Requires knowledge
- But very few sites cannot be made accessible
- Where accessibility is deliberately ignored
12Reasonable Adjustments
- s.21
- (1) where a provider of services has a practice,
policy or procedure which makes it impossible or
unreasonably difficult for disabled persons to
make use of a serviceit is his duty to take such
steps as it is reasonableto have to take in
order to change that practice, policy or
procedure so that it no longer has that effect.
13What is a reasonable adjustment?
- Is it reasonable to provide an accessible Website
where it had previously been inaccessible? - Main opposition is cost and work involved
- Question has been considered in Australia
14Maguire v SOCOG
- Visually impaired computer user
- Site was inaccessible
- No ALT attributes on images used for navigating
- Inaccessible tables used in layout of results
- Action under the Commonwealth DDA
15Maguire v SOCOG the findings
- Commission found that
- SOCOG was intending to offer a service to the
public by creating the Website - Site was inaccessible
- SOCOGs claims of unjustifiable hardship were
rejected - Expert witnesses testified
- Rolling development of the site
16Relevance of Maguire v SOCOG
- Reference to WAI Guidelines
- Standard for Accessibility
- Strict interpretation of undue hardship
- Likely to followed by UK courts when presented
with the issue
17What does this mean for Education?
- Public elements of the Web site will be
considered a service - Will have duties under Part III of the DDA
- Web site should follow the WAI guidelines to
comply with these duties
18Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001
(the SENDA)
- First duties came into force on 1 September 2002
- Inserts a new Part IV Education into the DDA
- Will effectively confer similar rights upon
disabled students
19What does the SENDA say?
- Not to treat disabled students less favourably
without justification - To make reasonable adjustments so that students
are not at a substantial disadvantage compared to
those who are not disabled
20Duties under the SENDA
- Not to discriminate in the arrangements for
determining admission - Not to discriminate in the student services it
provides or offers to provide - Not to discriminate against a disabled student by
excluding them from the institution either
permanently or temporarily
21What is a Student Service?
- Teaching (classes, lectures, seminars, practical
sessions) - Curriculum design
- Examinations and assessments
- Informal/optional study skills sessions
- Distance learning
- E-learning
- Learning equipment (handouts, lab equipment)
- Libraries, IT facilities and their resources
22Web/Intranet Pages
- If they provide information in relation to
education then they will be a student service - e.g. faculty homepage with course information
- If not will be covered by Part III of the Act
- Will need to be accessible
- Follow the W3C WAI Guidelines
23e-learning
- Specifically mentioned in the Code
- Similar principles apply to e-learning
- Need to ensure that materials and resources are
provided in an accessible form
24Accessible e-learning
- Provide online materials in an accessible form(s)
- e.g. html not proprietary formats unless you know
they will be accessible by all students - Use accessible versions of off the shelf
products like Blackboard and WebCT - Caption video/provide transcripts
- Use plain text in email
25Teaching/Lectures
- If using PowerPoint make sure that multimedia is
made accessible - Provide handouts online beforehand (in html and
Word/PDF) - Provide Videos on the Intranet
26Reasonable Adjustments
- reasonable is undefined
- Likely interpretation can be drawn from Maguire v
SOCOG and Part III of the Act - Providing course materials online is a far easier
and cheaper adjustment than providing in Braille
27Academic Standards
- Defence under the Act
- Unlikely to be relevant in these examples
- May apply where an external body sets the
standards for a course - e.g. the General Medical Council. Law Society etc
28Summary of the implications
- Accessible Web sites and teaching resources
- Accessible e-learning
- Provision of the necessary ICT to students to
access (from 1 September 2003)
29Final Summary
- Duties to make reasonable adjustments to student
services are now in force - Duties are anticipatory should not wait for a
problem to arise - Ultimate responsibility lies with the governing
body of the institution - But
30Final Thought
- Check your contract
- At Edinburgh University members of staff are
contractually obliged to indemnify the University
against any losses that the University might
incur as a result of material they post on the
University Web site
31Further Information
- TechDIS
- http//www.techdis.ac.uk
- RNIB See It Right Campaign
- http//www.rnib.org.uk/digital/siraccess/
- W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
- http//www.w3.org/wai/
- UK Resources for Web Accessibility and the Law
- http//www.btinternet.com/martin.a.sloan/