Neutrino mass hierarchy and ?13 Determination by Remote Detection of Reactor Antineutrinos - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Neutrino mass hierarchy and ?13 Determination by Remote Detection of Reactor Antineutrinos

Description:

Survival probability: 3 oscillating terms each cycling in L/E ... Strongly growing interest in geology community. Work proceeding and collaboration in formation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Mikhail48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neutrino mass hierarchy and ?13 Determination by Remote Detection of Reactor Antineutrinos


1
Neutrino mass hierarchy and ?13 Determination by
Remote Detection of Reactor Antineutrinos
  • Mikhail Batygov,
  • On behalf of UH Hanohano group,
  • September 14, Sendai TAUP 2007

2
Outline
  • Neutrino oscillation parameters
  • Current knowledge
  • Parameters to be estimated at higher accuracy
  • Methods
  • Requirements and the Hanohano project
  • Other physics goals
  • Current status and conclusion

3
Oscillation Parameters present
  • KamLAND (with SNO) analysis
  • tan2(?12)0.40(0.10/0.07)
  • ?m221(7.90.4/-0.35)10-5 eV2
  • Araki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 081801.
  • (UPDATED talk by I. Shimizu at this conference)
  • SuperK and K2K
  • ?m231(2.50.5)10-3 eV2
  • Ashie et al., Phys. Rev. D64 (2005) 112005
  • Aliu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 081802
  • CHOOZ limit sin2(2?13) 0.20
  • Apollonio et al., Eur. Phys. J. C27 (2003)
    331-374.

4
Oscillation parameters to be measured
2 mass diffs, 3 angles, 1 CP phase
  • Precision measurement
  • of mixing parameters needed
  • World effort to determine ?13 ( ?31)
  • Determination of mass hierarchy

5
3-? mixing
  • Pee1- cos4(?13) sin2(2?12) 1-cos(?m212L/2E)
  • cos2(?12) sin2(2?13)
    1-cos(?m213L/2E)
  • sin2(?12) sin2(2?13)
    1-cos(?m223L/2E)/2
  • Survival probability 3 oscillating terms each
    cycling in L/E space (t) with own periodicity
    (?m2?)
  • Amplitude ratios 13.5 2.5 1.0
  • Oscillation lengths 110 km (?m212) and 4 km
    (?m213 ?m223) at reactor peak 3.5 MeV
  • Two possible approaches
  • ½-cycle measurements can yield
  • Mixing angles, mass-squared differences
  • Less statistical uncertainty for same parameter
    and detector
  • Multi-cycle measurements can yield
  • Mixing angles, precise mass-squared differences
  • Mass hierarchy
  • Less sensitivity to systematic errors

6
?12 precise measurement
  • Reactor experiment- ? e point source
  • P(?e??e)1-sin2(2?12)sin2(?m221L/4E)
  • 60 GWkty exposure at 50-70 km
  • 4 systematic error
  • from near detector
  • sin2(?12) measured with
  • 2 uncertainty

Ideal spot
Bandyopadhyay et al., Phys. Rev. D67 (2003)
113011. Minakata et al., hep-ph/0407326 Bandyopadh
yay et al., hep-ph/0410283
7
3-flavor oscillations
  • High-frequency amplitude is ?13
  • In L/E plot, a purely sinusoidal factor
  • Invites the use of Fourier Transform for analysis

8
Fourier Transformed Spectrum
  • The size of the peak proportional to ?13.
  • The peaks asymmetry tells about hierarchy
  • Method developed at UH

?m232 lt ?m231 normal hierarchy
0.0025 eV2 peak due to nonzero ?13
Preliminary- 50 kt-y exposure at 50 km
range sin2(2?13)0.02 ?m2310.0025 eV2 to 1
level Learned, Dye,Pakvasa, Svoboda
hep-ex/0612022
Includes energy smearing
9
Hierarchy Discrimination
Perfect E resolution
?E 6sqrt(Evis)
E?, MeV
E?, MeV
  • Uses the difference in spectra
  • Efficiency depends heavily on energy resolution

10
Estimation of the statistical significance
Neutrino events to 1 ? CL
lt 3 desirable but maybe unrealistic E resolution
KamLAND 0.065 MeV0.5
Detector energy resolution, MeV0.5
  • Thousands of events necessary for reliable
    discrimination, even at 1 ? CL
  • Longer baselines more sensitive to energy
    resolution may be beneficial to adjust for
    actual detector performance

11
Additional goal neutrino geophysics
  • Antineutrinos produced in ?-decays of 232Th and
    238U decay series isotopes
  • A substantial (but not known precisely) part of
    Earth heat flux of 40 (31) TW
  • In continent-based detectors, flux dominated by
    continental crust
  • Ocean-based detectors allow to measure
    geo-neutrino flux from mantle

12
Requirements
  • Baseline on the order of 50 km better variable
    for different studies
  • Big number of events (large detector)
  • For Hierarchy
  • Good to excellent energy resolution
  • sin2(2?13) ? 0
  • No full or nearly full mixing in ?12 (almost
    assured by SNO and KamLAND)
  • For Geo-neutrinos ability to switch off
    reactor background

13
MeV-Scale Electron Anti-Neutrino Detection
Key 2 flashes, close in space and time, 2nd of
known energy, eliminate background
Production in reactors and natural decays
Detection
EvisE?-0.8 MeV prompt
delayed Evis2.2 MeV
  • Standard inverse ß-decay coincidence
  • E? gt 1.8 MeV
  • Rate and precise spectrum but no direction

Reines Cowan
14
Hanohano detector
  • 10-kt LS detector
  • Primary detection method inverse-beta decay
  • Ocean-based, with 2 key advantages
  • Adjustable baseline
  • Ability to avoid reactor background in the
    geo-neutrino studies

Barge 112 m long x 23.3 wide
15
Additional Physics/AstrophysicsHanohano will be
biggest low energy neutrino detector
  • Nucleon Decay (SUSY-favored kaon modes may be
    also possible)
  • Supernova Detection special ?e ability
  • Relic SN Neutrinos
  • GRBs and other rare impulsive sources
  • Long list of ancillary, non-interfering science,
    with strong discovery potential

16
Current status
  • Several workshops held (04, 05, 06) and ideas
    developed
  • Study funds provided preliminary engineering and
    physics feasibility report (11/06)
  • Strongly growing interest in geology community
  • Work proceeding and collaboration in formation
  • Upcoming workshops in Washington DC (10/07) and
    Paris (12/07) for reactor monitoring
  • Funding request for next stage (06) in motion
  • Ancillary proposals and computer studies continue

17
Summary
  • Better precision for sin2(2?12) and sin2(2?13)
    along with the determination of hierarchy
    possible for reactor-based antineutrino
    experiment
  • Variable baseline desirable
  • particular measurements require individual tuning
  • optimal placement dependent on unknown parameters
  • minimize systematic errors (esp. in energy scale)
  • Needs large statistics ? big detector
  • Requires precise ?e energy measurement
  • Hanohano designed to meet those goals and also
    provides
  • Unique sensitivity to mantle geo-neutrinos
  • Ability to avoid reactor background when needed
  • Additional physics measurements achievable to
    higher precision
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com