Company analysis: Pfizer Inc' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Company analysis: Pfizer Inc'

Description:

Commercial approaches implemented by international and domestic banks in ... In 2006 Yunus and the Grameen Bank received the Nobel Peace Prize. 1. Introduction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: ienB
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Company analysis: Pfizer Inc'


1
Microcredit and Microfinance
Dr. Marco Elia, University of Turin -
Italy Belgrade, 28th November 2007
2
Agenda
  • Introduction What is Microfinance? The
    Institutionist and the Welfarist approach
  • Microcredit and Microfinance
  • Commercial approaches implemented by
    international and domestic banks in microfinance

3
1. Introduction
  • What is Microfinance?
  • The provision of small scale financial services
    to low-income people excluded from the formal
    financial system
  • Almost general agreement on this definition
  • Commitment to provide credit
  • Common concern for low income people

4
1. Introduction
Unity of commitments and concerns It masks
different approaches Different types of
institutions, borrowers, delivery systems put
(sometimes incorrectly) under the term
MICROFINANCE
5
1. Introduction
MICROFINANCE SPECIALIZED FIELD THAT
COMBINES BANKING WITH SOCIAL GOALS
6
1. Introduction
  • Institutionist approach (WB, CGAP, USAID)
  • Focus on Financial self-sufficiency (FSS) and
    institutional scale
  • Welfarist approach
  • Direct poverty alleviation among the very poor
  • Jonathan Morduch(1998) The Microfiance Schism

7
1. Introduction
  • THE INSTITUTIONISTS
  • Emphasis FSS and breadth over depth of outreach
  • Center of attention The institution
  • Main success index achieve Financial Self
    Sufficiency (FSS)

8
1. Introduction
  • THE WELFARISTS
  • Emphasis Depth of outreach
  • Center of attention Clients
  • Accept and require subsidies
  • Grameen Bank of Bangladesh
  • THE INSTITUTIONISTS HAVE CLEARLY WON THE DEBATE
    TO DATE

9
1. Introduction
  • PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
  • Different clients served
  • Different methodologies
  • Different institutional structures and financing

10
1. Introduction
  • The Institutionist argument
  • Recognition of scarcity (potential demand cannot
    be met only by donors)
  • Poverty reduction requires massive scale
  • BEST PRACTICES essential step for FSS, CAPITAL
    MARKET ACCESS and MAXIMUM OUTREACH TO POOR
    CLIENTS

11
1. Introduction
  • The Welfarists
  • Depth over breadth of outreach
  • FSS desirable, not necessary
  • Concerns that profit-making MFIs will lose
    their social mission

12
1. Introduction
  • Microfinance must be integrated into the formal
    financial system
  • Annual spending of the donor community on
    microfinance
  • 800 million - 1 billion per year (CGAP, 2004)
  • Potential demand 500,000,000 clients far
    exceeds the capacity of donor funding (World
    Bank)

13
1. Introduction
  • .. a short history
  • 1960s 1970s credit provided to rural farmers
    by many state-run dev. Institutions (RDIs)
  • RDIs almost always failed
  • Grant mentality
  • High transaction costs
  • Heavy corruption
  • Limited impact
  • BELIEF THAT LOW INCOME PEOPLE ARE UNBANKABLE
  • The Institutionist approach is partially an
    outcome of these failures

14
1. Introduction
  • June 2004 The Group of Eight (G8) endorsed the
    11 key principles developed by CGAP (a consortium
    of 28 public and privaste member donors) at the
    meeting in Sea Island (Georgia) They intent to
    build a base a basic principles to support a
    diversity of approaches
  • 2005 has been declared Year of Microcredit by the
    United Nations
  • In 2006 Yunus and the Grameen Bank received the
    Nobel Peace Prize

15
1. Introduction
  • Furthermore must be highlighted that
  • Major innovations came from highly subsidized
    MFIs
  • The relationship focus on the poor and profit
    orientation is not always clear
  • CGAP admits that the majority of the MFIs do not
    have the potential to be FSS in the near future
  • For certain target groups the benefits of ongoing
    subsidization may exceed their costs

16
Agenda
  • Introduction What is Microfinance? The
    Institutionist and the Welfarist approach
  • Microcredit and Microfinance
  • Commercial approaches implemented by
    international and domestic banks in microfinance

17
2. Microcredit and Microfinance
  • Lack of clarity in using the terms
  • The two ideas must be clearly differenciated
  • Microfinance is he provision of small scale
    financial services (Microcredit, Microsavings,
    Microinsurance, money transfer) to low-income
    people
  • MICROCREDIT IS A PART OF THE FIELD OF
    MICROFINANCE

18
2. Microcredit and Microfinance
  • The term Microfinance was first introduced in the
    1990s as a transformation, or extension, of the
    already popular and successful poverty
    alleviating idea of microcredit
  • The first generation of institutions (NGOs)
    delivered almost only credit
  • Successful example of Bank Rakhyat Indonesia in
    providing savings accounts poor people

19
2. Microcredit and Microfinance
  • Savings services are as important as loans
  • All the financial services, and not just loans,
    help low income people to smooth consumption,
    stabilize income and protect against risks
    (Broadening of the concept of microfinance)
  • Importance of money transfer services
  • Training to client is a non-financial service
  • CENTRAL ROLE OF CREDIT METHODOLOGIES

20
2. Microcredit and Microfinance
Microenterprise Development, Microfinance and
Microcredit
21
Agenda
  • Introduction What is Microfinance? The
    Institutionist and the Welfarist approach
  • Microcredit and Microfinance
  • Commercial approaches implemented by
    international and domestic banks in microfinance

22
4. Commercial approaches
Direct (downscaling, MFI at the outset) vs.
Indirect approach (Loans to MFIs, partnerships,
etc..) Legal constraints mainly related to
interest rates celings Evidence from the current
practice around the world show a dual
approach The potential for grow is huge
especially for additional financial services
besides credit (strategy of Bank Rakyat vs.
BancoSol) The key constraint is the lack of
institutional and human capacity (CGAP, Key
Principles of Microfinance)
23
  • References
  • Easton, T. (2005). The hidden wealth of the poor.
    Survey Microfinance - The Economist, November
    3rd 2005
  • Harper, M. and Arora, S.S. (2005). Small
    Customers, Big Market Commercial Banks in
    Microfinance. New Delhi, TERI Press
  • Meyer, R. and Zeller, M. (2002). The Triangle of
    MICROFINANCE Financial Sustainability, Outreach
    and Impact. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore and
    London
  • Morduch, J. (1999). The microfinance promise.
    Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1569-1614
  • Morduch, J. (2000) The Microfinance Schism. World
    Development Vol.28, No.4, pp. 617-629
  • Shreiner, M. (2003). A Cost-Effectiveness
    Analysis of the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh.
    Center for Social Development, Washington
    University in St. Louis
  • Silverman, R. E. (2006). A New Way to Do Well by
    Doing Good Microfinance Funds Earn Returns on
    Tiny Loans To Poor Entrepreneurs Abroad. The Wall
    Street Journal, 5 January
  • Yunus, M. (1998). Banker to the Poor The
    Autobiography of Muhammad Yunus, Founder of
    Grameen Bank. The University Press Limited,
    London
  • marco.elia_at_unito.it

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com