Title: Does Government Work Evaluating Programs and Policies
1Does Government Work?Evaluating Programs and
Policies
- Katherine C. Naff, Ph.D.
- January 22, 2002
2Policies Often Respond to Problems
- Second hand smoke harms peoples health
- People are living in poverty because they dont
have the education required for a job - Cities are plagued by jobless gang members and
antisocial youth
3Programs developed to achieve policy objectives
- Objective Reduce second-hand smoke
- Program Smoking cessation program
- Objective Ensure all have access to education
- Program Provide support to college students at
risk for dropping out - Objective Help prepare gang members and
antisocial youth for jobs - Program Finance tattoo removal
4Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
- Requires federal agencies to
- Set strategic goals
- Measure performance toward achieving those goals
- Publicly report on their progress
5GPRA is to
- improve congressional decisionmaking by
providing more objective information on achieving
statutory objectives, and on the relative
effectiveness and efficiency of federal programs
and spending. - Answer the defining question Do the programs
contribute to a real difference in the quality
and security of citizens lives? - Shift focus from preoccupation with staffing and
activity levels to a broader focus on the results
or outcomes of federal programs - Source David Walker
6Traditional performance measures
- Amount of money spent to support program
- Number of staff employed
- Number of tasks completed
- GPRA measures
- Outcomes or results
7Example OSHA
- Activity or Output
- Inspect 2000 plants this year
- Outcome
- Reduce workplace injuries by 20
8Example Welfare Reform
- Activity or Output
- Enroll 50 percent of welfare recipients in
training programs - Outcome
- 50 of welfare recipients are in full-time jobs
9Performance Measurement vs. Program Evaluation
- Performance measurement asks, Are we achieving
the goals we set, as shown by measurable
outcomes? - Program evaluation asks, Is the program
responsible for the measurable outcomes we
observe?
10Example SSS-TRIO program
- Objective To help at risk students to stay in
college until they earn their Bachelors degree - Activities orientation, tutoring, skills
workshops, mandatory advising, guaranteed
registration in remedial classes, financial aid
low income, first generation college, or
individual with disabilities
11Program theory
- Engaging students in this set of activities will
increase the likelihood that they will graduate
with a Bachelors degree, and that degree will
enable them to participate more fully in
Americas economic and social life.
12Outcome Line
Activity
Activity
Activity
Ultimate Outcome (happiness)
Subobjective
Subobjective
Outcome of interest
As described by Lawrence Mohr
13SSS-TRIO Outcome Line
Orientation
Tutoring
Study Skills Workshops
Commitment to program
Improved grasp of concepts
Improved study habits
Fuller participation in America
Graduate
Retained
Better Grades
14Is SSS-TRIO achieving its purpose?
- Process evaluation Is the program being
implemented as intended? - Outcome (impact) evaluation Is the program
achieving specified outcomes?
15Process Measures
- of students who attended orientation
- of students who received tutoring
- of students who participated in workshops
16Outcome measures
- Subobjectives
- of program students who maintained GPA of 2.0
or better each year - of program students with GPAs under 3.0 who
increased their GPAs by .2 after 4 semesters - of program students retained each year
- Outcome of interest
- of program students who graduate
17Expected Outcomes
- A minimum of 80 of participants will maintain a
GPA of 2.0 or better each year. - 75 of program participants with GPAs under 3.0
will increase their GPAs by .2. - A minimum of 65 of program participants will be
retained each year. - A minimum of 45 of participants will graduate
each year.
18Quantifying Program Impact
- Program Impact Results Counterfactual
- Counterfactual Estimate of what results would
have been if program had not been implemented
19Example SSS-TRI
- Program Impact 45 graduation rate - 25
graduation rate - Program Impact increase in graduation rate by
20 percentage points
20Estimating the counterfactual
- Previous experience
- External events
- Attrition
- Hawthorne effect
- Control group
- Selection bias
- Effects resulting from knowledge about other
group
21Other Questions
- Are we addressing the right problem?
- Are there other intervening variables?
- Are there alternative explanations?
- Is the program theory, as specified in the
outcome line, correct?
22Examining Linkages (formative evaluation)
Skills workshop
Improved study habits
Graduation
Graduation
Improved study habits
Skills workshop
23How does evaluation compare to other forms of
research?
- Both require
- Rigorous design
- Similar techniques for data collection and
analysis - Concern for issues of validity and reliability
- Competence and objectivity
24How does evaluation compare to other forms of
research?
- Evaluation
- Has real world consequences
- Takes place in a political environment
- Must deal with the march of time
- Often faces data and other resource constraints
- Is supposed to improve programs as well as assess
their outcomes.
25Summing up
- Programs are intended to achieve policy
objectives, often to solve a problem - Performance measurement tells us if we are
getting results - Program evaluation tells us if the program is
giving us those results - Evaluators must consider issues that might
undermine our conclusions - Program evaluation is rigorous research in a real
world setting.
26Excellent Sources
- Program Evaluation
- Lawrence Mohr, Impact Analysis for Program
Evaluation (2nd edition, 1995) - Carol Weiss, Evaluation (2nd edition, 1998)
- Steven Isaac and William B. Michael, Handbook in
Research and Evaluation (3rd edition, 1997) - Performance Measurement
- Harry Hatry, et al. Urban Institute Press
- General Accounting Office (www.gao.gov)