Israel involvement in the EUs Research Framework Programme - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Israel involvement in the EUs Research Framework Programme

Description:

Israel's status of ' Associated Country ' requires financial participation to the FP budget ... Israel's share is calculated on the basis of the % of its GNP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: ecdele
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Israel involvement in the EUs Research Framework Programme


1
  • Israel involvement in the EUs Research
    Framework Programme

Scientific Counsellor's Office
2
Background
  • On 8 March 1999, the second  Agreement for
    Scientific and Technical Co-operation between the
    European Community and Israel  entered into
    force.
  • By virtue of this agreement, which reniewed a
    previous agreement entered into force on 6 August
    1996 and expired 31 December 1998, Israel has
    been fully associated with the 5th Framework
    Programme for Community RTD (1999-2002)
  • A new agreement has been signed on June 10th,
    2003 to fully associate Israel in the 6th
    Framework Programme (2002-2006) as from 16
    December 2002.

3
The 5th Framework Programme 1999-2002
Quality of Life Living Resources 2.413 B
Information Society Technologies 3.600 B
Competitive Sustainable Growth 2.705 B
Energy, environ. sustainable development 2.125
B
Joint Research Center739 M
Euratom1.260 M
4
Israel in FP5 FP6
  • Israels status of  Associated Country 
    requires financial participation to the FP
    budget (150 M-EURO for FP5 192 M-EURO for FP6)
  • Israels share is calculated on the basis of the
    of its GNP compared to the total GNP of all
    contributing countries.
  • In return Israeli organisations, which take part
    in joint EU-Israel selected projects, can receive
    a financial contribution from the Commission
    consisting of the reimbursement of the eligible
    costs incurred.

5
FP5 projects with IL participants
6
Israeli participants (1)
others
universities
industries
Percentages differ according to specific
programmes .
7
Israeli participants (2)
IST
Quality of Life
GROWTH
EESD
8
Estimated research funds granted to Israeli
entities in FP5
Innovation
9
EU partners in projects with Israel
Number of projects
10
Ass. Countr. Partners in projects with Israel
Number of projects
11
Example of projects (1)
http//www.optibase.com/videogateway/
12
Example of projects (2)
Technological platform broad scale project aiming
at developing an improved design of the AIRBUS
airplane body
F Gie Airbus Industrie (co-ordinator) D Daimler
Chryler Aerospace Airbus F Airbus
Aerospatiale GR Hellenic Aerospace
Industry I Finmeccanica S.P.A. Alenia Aeronautica
IL Israel Aircraft Industries NL Fokker Control
Systems S SAAB UK British Aerospace
13
Example of projects (3)
The project offers a method for spraying
orchards, whereby the amount of spray is adjusted
to the trees size and volume by means of a three
dimensional digital map derived from aerial
photography
IL MIGAL, Galilee Techn Centre (co-ordinator) D
Institute of Plant Protection DK Hardy
International IL Institute of Agricultural Engine
ering, Volcani Centre IL A.P.A.C. NATAV
(photography) IL GISha Systems NL Institute of
Agricultural Environmental engineering NL Fruit
Research Station
14
Assessment of EU-ISRAEL co-operation in FP5
  • Collaboration
  • Technolgy
  • Marketing
  • Intellectual property
  • Funding

15
Assessment of EU-ISRAEL co-operation in FP5
  • Multicultural cooperation brings added value,
    new ideas, accelerate innovation
  • Networking involvement in new scientific
    networks, building partnerships that continue
    after projects termination
  • EU partners appreciate Israeli entrepreneurial
    spirit, high motivation enthusiasm

16
Assessment of EU-ISRAEL co-operation in FP5
  • Share technical risks
  • Find complementary needed expertise
  • Contribution to international standards
  • EU partners appreciate Israeli technological
    excellence in key scientific and technological
    domains

17
Assessment of EU-ISRAEL co-operation in FP5
  • Technical co-operation opens up the way for
    future business collaboration
  • Access to EU market, huge potential in close
    proximity to Israel
  • Collaborative RTD efforts shorten time to market

18
Assessment of EU-ISRAEL co-operation in FP5
  • Collaborative RTD generates an increasing amount
    of IPR, which, properly managed, allow
    exploitation benefits and creation of spin-offs

19
Assessment of EU-ISRAEL co-operation in FP5
  • While considered important, getting funding is
    not the primary motivation
  • Priority is given to the alignment of the
    company/organisations strategy with the
    objectives of the projects

20
Other EU-Israel RD co-operation
Created in 1985, EUREKA is a Europe-wide network
promoting collaborative market-driven research
and development (RD) projects in most fields of
advanced civilian technology.
In June 2000, at the EUREKA Ministerial
Conference in Hanover, Israel was accepted in
EUREKA as full Member.
While FP5 projects focus on precompetitive RD,
EUREKA projects are market driven and
"bottom-up", projects content, time scale and
costs, participants are defined by the partners
themselves.
21
Other EU-Israel RD co-operation
  • Many bilateral agreements or Memoranda of
    Understanding (MoU) covering scientific
    co-operation are signed between Israel and most
    European countries
  • The objective of the European Commission is to
    foster synergies between these bilateral
    initiatives and other EU initiatives

22
6th Framework Programme - FP6 -
23
Current situation
  • Agreement signed on June 10th, 2003
  • Allows Israel to participate from the first calls
    from proposals, i.e. from 16 December 2002
  • Calls for Proposals
  • 1st calls launched 17/12/02, due date from
    17/03/03
  • Other calls to follow, consult

24
FP6-17500Meur
Non-Nuclear-16270M
Euratom - 1230M
Strengthening ERA-320M
FocusingIntegrating Community Research-13345M (28
5M for 3rd countries participation)
Spec.Priorities for a Wider Field of Research
-1300M
JRC 760M
Coordination of Activities 270M
Thematic Priorities - 11285M
8.Supporting Policies Anticipating ST
Needs 555M
Coherent Developt of Policies 50M
1.Genomics Biotech for Health -2255M
Combating major diseases 1100M
Advanced genomics health applications-1155M
Structuring ERA-2605M
2.IST -3625M
Horizontal SME Research 430M
3.Nanotechnologies Nanoscience-1300M
Research Innovation290M
International Cooperation 315M
4.Aeronautics Space -1075M
5.Food Quality Safety -685M
Human Resources-1580M
6.Sustainable Global Changes Ecosystems 2120M
Energy -810M
Research Infrastructures655M
Transport -610M
Global Changes Ecosystems-700M
Science Society-80M
7.Citizens Governance -225M
25
 Integrating research  3 new instruments
  • Networks of excellence
  • Towards  virtual centres of excellence
  • Integrated projects
  • A new order of magnitude
  • Programmes carried out jointly
  • To achieve convergence of national programmes

26
 Integrating research  3 new instruments
  • Networks of excellence
  • Lasting integration of research capacities
  • Execution of joint programmes of activities
  • Genuine virtual centres of excellence
  • Operational autonomy
  • Gradual integration of the work programmes
  • Selected on the basis of calls for proposals
  • Integrated projects
  • Programmes carried out jointly

27
 Integrating research  3 new instruments
  • Networks of excellence
  • Integrated projects
  • Actions with a real European scope
  • Involving significant mobilisation of
    stake-holders
  • High level of autonomy
  • Implemented through overall financing plans
  • Selected on the basis of calls for proposals
  • Programmes carried out jointly

28
 Integrating research  3 new instruments
  • Networks of excellence
  • Integrated projects
  • Programmes carried out jointly
  • Financial participation in national programmes
    carried out jointly (article 169 of the EU
    Treaty)
  • Specific implementation structure
  • Development or operation of common infrastructures

29
Information sources
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com