LanguageBased Spelling Instruction for Children Who Are HardofHearing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

LanguageBased Spelling Instruction for Children Who Are HardofHearing

Description:

Mild conductive HL in right ear from 250-8000 Hz. ... Word journeys assessment-guided phonics, spelling, and vocabulary. instruction. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: easter6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LanguageBased Spelling Instruction for Children Who Are HardofHearing


1
Language-Based Spelling Instruction for Children
Who Are Hard-of-Hearing
Brittney Yakey, B.S., Eastern Illinois
University, Email blyakey_at_eiu.edu, Phone
217-581-2712 Rebecca M. Throneburg, Ph.D.,
CCC-SLP, Eastern Illinois University, Email
rmthroneburg_at_eiu.edu, Phone 217-581-2712 Lynn
Wilkerson, M.S., M.A., CCC-SLP/A, Eastern
Illinois University, Email lynnwilkerson_at_yahoo.co
m, Phone 210-764-8906
Subjects
  • Language Base of Spelling
  • Spelling and reading share many of the same
    underlying linguistic skills and are similar in
    development. Spelling has also been found to be
    a good predictor of reading levels (Gough, Juel,
    Griffin, 1992 Ehri, 2000).
  • Reading and spelling involve the use of
    phonological awareness, knowledge of orthography,
    vocabulary, morphology, and mental orthographic
    images of words (Wasowicz, Masterson, Apel,
    2003 Wasowicz, Apel, Masterson, Whitney,
    2004).
  • Children who are prelingually deaf usually do not
    become successful readers and spellers. This is
    thought to be related to limited vocabulary, poor
    morphology knowledge, underdeveloped phonological
    awareness, and poor auditory mental images
    (Gibbs, 2004 Miller, 1997).
  • Allman (2002) found that the spelling patterns of
    children who were hard-of-hearing were more
    similar to younger normally developing children
    than to the spelling patterns of deaf children.
  • Discussion
  • Summary of Results
  • BF improved in all four spelling patterns
    targeted, whole words spelled correctly on the
    SPELL, and in reading and spelling on the WRAT.
  • AH improved in two of the spelling patterns,
    remained the same on one, and decreased in one of
    the spelling patterns targeted. She decreased in
    whole words spelled correctly on the SPELL, and
    she decreased in reading and spelling on the
    WRAT.
  • Explanation of Results
  • The amount of motivation to improve spelling may
    have been a factor in the scores on the SPELL,
    WRAT, and Featured Inventories.
  • AH had a more severe hearing loss and was younger
    which may also have influenced her performance.
  • The hour long sessions may have been too long of
    a time period for the participants to maintain
    focus and motivation (especially for AH).
  • Limitations
  • Limitations included a lack of a control
    mechanism.
  • A larger number of words tested per pattern would
    allow for a more sensitive measure.
  • A longer period of instruction to allow for
    greater learning and carryover.
  • Future Research
  • Research is needed with normal hearing children
    individually and in large groups using the
    SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing program, as
    well as with children with language and reading
    delays.
  • Spelling instruction over a longer time period
    would be recommended to allow more practice for
    participants.
  • Research is also needed to compare other
    instructional spelling programs to SPELL-Links to
    Reading and Writing for normally developing
    children and children with other impairments.

Treatment Patterns Baselines and Posttest
  • Stages of Spelling
  • Researchers have classified the development of
    spelling into five stages (Ganske, 2000 Gunning,
    2006 Scott Masterson, 1996).
  • Prephonemic stage
  • Alphabetic stage
  • Word pattern stage
  • Syllabic stage
  • Morphemic stage


Whole Words Spelled Correctly on SPELL Baselines
and Posttest
  • SPELL Instructional Program
  • Overview of the general SPELL-Links to Reading
    Writing program
  • SPELL-Links to Reading Writing (Wasowicz et
    al., 2004) uses core components such as
    phonological awareness training and word level
    activities, as well as optional connected writing
    and timed reading activities to target over 70
    spelling patterns using different word study
    knowledge and teaches skills that are necessary
    for correct spelling of that pattern.
  • SPELL components used in the current study
  • Instruction was provided in two 1-hour lessons
    over five weeks during the summer (10 hours total
    spelling instruction).
  • Four spelling patterns were targeted 1) short
    vowel u 2) ng 3) ck 4) final ch, tch.
  • Lessons focused on core activities such as
    targeting sound-letter knowledge, sound
    discrimination, possible ways to spell sounds,
    and visual images of words.
  • The optional timed reading activities were not
    completed after the lessons however, one of the
    five optional connected writing activities was
    completed after each lesson.
  • The students were required to complete each of
    the core activities with 70-75 accuracy before
    advancing to the next activity.
  • Spelling Instruction
  • Scott and Brown (2001) described three general
    categories of spelling instruction memorizing
    weekly word lists, word analysis and word
    sorting, and spelling integrated in writing and
    reading.
  • SPELL-Links to Reading Writing
  • Spelling Performance Evaluation for Language and
    Literacy-Links to Reading Writing (SPELL) is a
    language-based instructional spelling program
    that also includes multisensory teaching
    components.
  • It teaches critical word study skills through
    spelling, reading, and writing activities.
  • Kellman and Apel (2004) used the SPELL-Links to
    Reading Writing instructional methods on a
    normal hearing 11-year-old girl with spelling
    difficulties.
  • Apel, Masterson, and Hart (2004) also used
    instructional methods from the SPELL-Links to
    Reading Writing with one classroom and compared
    the results to a second classroom using
    traditional spelling instruction.
  • Both studies found positive benefits from the
    SPELL-Links to Reading Writing program.
  • SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing has not been
    researched with the hard-of-hearing population.

References Allman, T. M. (2002). Patterns of
spelling in young deaf and hard-of-hearing
students. American Annals of the Deaf,
147, 46-61. Apel, K., Masterson, J., Hart, P.
(2004). Integration of language components in
spelling Instruction that maximizes
students learning. In E. Silliman L. Wilkinson
(Eds.), Language and literacy learning
in schools (pp. 292-315). New York, NY The
Guilford Press. Ehri, L. (2000). Learning to
read and learning to spell Two sides of a coin.
Topics in Language Disorders, 20,
12-36. Ganske, K. (2000). Word journeys
assessment-guided phonics, spelling, and
vocabulary instruction. New York, NY The
Guilford Press. Gibbs, S. (2004). The skills in
reading shown by young children with permanent
and moderate hearing impairment.
Educational Research, 46, 18-27. Gough, P., Juel,
C., Griffin, P. (1992). Reading, spelling, and
the orthographic cipher. In P. Gough, L.
Ehri, R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition
(pp. 35-48). Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates. Gunning, T. G. (2006).
Assessing and correcting reading and writing
difficulties. Boston, MA Pearson
Education, Inc. Kelman, M. E., Apel, K.
(2004). Effects of a multiple linguistic and
prescriptive approach to spelling
instruction A case study. Communication
Disorders Quarterly, 25, 56-66. Miller, P.
(1997). The effect of communication mode on the
development of phonemic awareness in
prelingually deaf students. Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing Research, 40,
1151-1163. Scott, C. M., Brown, S. L. (2001).
Spelling and the speech-language pathologist
Theres more than meets the eye. Seminars
in Speech and Language, 22, 197-207. Scott, P.
T., Masterson, J. J. (1996). Assessment and
intervention for children with specific
spelling disabilities. Retrieved October 20,
2005, http//www.missouristate.edu/scd/facul
ty/jjm/research/ScotMas96.htm. Wasowicz, J.,
Masterson, J., Apel, K. (2003). Spelling
performance evaluation for language and
literacy. Evanston, IL Learning By Design,
Inc. Wasowicz, J., Apel, K., Masterson, J.,
Whitney, A. (2004). SPELL-Links to reading and
writing. Evanston, IL Learning By Design,
Inc.
WRAT Baselines and Posttest
  • Measures
  • SPELL computerized assessment
  • Main test module uses 82 words.
  • Pattern percent accuracy measured.
  • Total number of whole words spelled
    correctly on the SPELL
  • assessment.
  • The Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) reading
    and spelling subtests.
  • Reading and spelling subtests increase in
    complexity,
  • Administration ceased after 10 consecutive
    errors.
  • Purpose
  • Purpose of current study was to evaluate the
    effectiveness of the SPELL-Links to Reading and
    Writing instructional language-based spelling
    program with two hard-of-hearing children between
    10 to 11 years of age.

BF AH
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com