Oil Field Pump - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Oil Field Pump

Description:

The mechanism chosen for our class project is the oil field pump shown in figure ... The polishing rod is attached to a sucker rod, which is attached to a pump. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:475
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: locald
Category:
Tags: field | oil | pump | sucker

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Oil Field Pump


1
Oil Field Pump
  • Ron Sucik
  • Chris Page
  • Casey Staniec
  • Ed Sackley
  • November 18, 2005

2
Abstract
  • The mechanism chosen for our class project is the
    oil field pump shown in figure (4-16) from The
    Design of Machinery (pg 208). These pumps are
    also known as reciprocating rod pumps. This
    mechanism is a basic four bar that is driven by
    an engine a basic four bar that is driven by an
    engine which will need to move very large masses
    at a constant rotational velocity. The motor
    drives the crank in a circular motion giving the
    mechanism planar motion. This motion is possible
    because it is a four bar, case 1 Grashof
    mechanism (crank rocker). Two critical parameters
    of the pumps operation are the range of motion at
    the end of the rocker arm connected to the pump
    rod, and the length of the crank. Both of these
    factors determine the stress and displacement of
    the mechanism.
  • These oil pumps are important today because they
    are still the main source of oil production. The
    four bar itself is a steel structure and has a
    very long lifetime. Most likely the first
    component to wear out is either the pump that is
    submerged into the ground and constantly moving
    up and down. Keeping the friction of the pump as
    low as possible will ensure a longer life for the
    pump. The joints for the connecting rods will
    also need to withstand long periods at high Rpms
    and the high mass of the crank, coupler, and
    rocker. Since they do not require an operator
    they are a safe, simple, and reliable mechanisms.

3
How Oilfield Pumps Work
In the pump system, an electric motor drives a
gear that moves a lever. The lever pushes and
pulls a polishing rod up and down. The polishing
rod is attached to a sucker rod, which is
attached to a pump. This system forces the pump
up and down, creating a suction that draws oil up
through the well.
4
How Pumping Works
  • In some cases, the oil may be too heavy to flow.
    A second hole is then drilled into the reservoir
    and steam is injected under pressure. The heat
    from the steam thins the oil in the reservoir,
    and the pressure helps push it up the well. This
    process is called enhanced oil recovery.

5
Offshore Oil Field (Caspian Sea)
6
Critical Parameters
  • This mechanism is a basic four bar that is driven
    by an engine.
  • The motor drives the crank in a circular motion
    giving the mechanism planar motion.
  • The range of motion at the end of the rocker arm
    connection to the pump rod.
  • The length of the crank.
  • Most likely the first component to wear out is
    either the pump that is submerged into the
    ground.
  • Keeping the friction of the pump as low as
    possible will ensure a longer life for the pump.
  • The joints for the connecting rods will also need
    to withstand long periods at high Rpms.

7
(No Transcript)
8
DOF / Grashof Evaluation
  • Grueblers Equation M 3L - 2J 3G
  • M Degrees of Freedom
  • L Number of Links
  • J Number of joints
  • G Number of grounded links
  • 1 3(4) 2(4) 3(1)
  • 1 Degree of Freedom
  • Grashof Condition, Class 1 (crank rocker) S
    L lt P Q
  • S length of shortest link
  • L length of longest link
  • P length of one remaining link
  • Q length of other remaining link
  • 14 79.7 lt 80 51.26
  • Grashof Condition Confirmed

9
Position analysis
  • a 14, b 80, c 51.26, d 79.7 ?(2) 63??
  • K1 d/a 79.7/14 5.693
  • K2 d/c 79.7/51.26 1.555
  • K3 (a2 b2 c2 d2) / (2ac) (142
    802 51.262 79.72) / (2 14 51.26) 1.934
  • K4 d/b 79.7/80 .99625
  • K5 (c2 d2 a2 b2) / (2ab) (51.262
    79.72 142 802) / (2 14 18) -4.61
  • A cos?(2) K1 K2cos?(2) K3 cos (63?)
    5.693 1.555 cos (63?) 1.934 -4.61
  • B -2sin?(2) -2sin (63?) -1.782
  • C K1 (K2 1)cos?(2) K3 5.693 (1.555
    1)cos (63?) 1.934 6.47
  • D cos?(2) K1 K4cos?(2) K5 cos (63?)
    5.693 .99625 cos (63?) -4.61 -9.4
  • E -2sin?(2) -2sin (63?) -1.782
  • T(3) 2arctan ((-E v(E2 4DF))/(2D))
    2arctan ((1.782 v(1.7822 4-9.41.08)) /
    (2-9.4)) 28.9??
  • T(3) 2arctan ((-E v(E2 4DF))/(2D))
    2arctan ((1.782 - v(1.7822 4-9.41.08)) /
    (2-9.4)) -48.2??
  • T(4) 2arctan ((-B v(B2 4AC))/(2A)) 2artan
    ((1.782 v(1.7822 4-4.016.47) / (2-4.01))
    93.7??
  • T(4) 2arctan ((-B v(B2 4AC))/(2A)) 2artan
    ((1.782 - v(1.7822 4-4.016.47) / (2-4.01))
    -113??

10
Velocity Analysis
  • a 14, b 80, c 51.26, d 79.7 ?(2) 63?? ,
    ?(3) 28.9??, ?(4) 93.7??, ?2 60 Rpm 6.283
    rad/s
  • ?3o (a?2 sin (?(4) ?(2)) / (bsin (?(3)
    ?(4)) (14 60 sin(97.3 63)) / (80
    sin(28.9 93.7) -5.925 Rpm
  • ?3 -5.925 Rpm -.6204 rad/s
  • ?4o (a?2 sin (?(2) ?(3)) / (csin (?(4)
    ?(3)) (14 60 sin(63 28.9)) / (51.26
    sin(93.7 28.9) 10.154Rpm
  • ?4 10.154 Rpm 1.063 rad/s

11
Point Velocity Analysis, Pump Head
  • V(A) a ?2 (-sin ?(2) j cos ?(2)) 14 6.283
    (-sin (63) j cos (63)) 87.96 ft/s _at_ 153??
  • V(BA) b ?3 (-sin ?(3) j cos ?(3)) 80
    -.6204 (-sin (28.9) j cos (28.9)) 49.632 ft/s
    _at_ -61.1??
  • V(B) c ?4 (-sin ?(4) j cos ?(4)) 51.26
    1.063 (-sin (93.7) j cos (93.7)) 54.49 ft/s _at_
    -176.3??
  • V(P) p ?4 (-sin (?(4) ?(4)) j cos (?(4)
    ? (4)) 51.26 1.063 (-sin (137.2) j cos
    (137.2) 51.2 ft/s _at_ -132.8

12
Acceleration Analysis
  • a 14, b 80, c 51.26, d 79.7 ?(2) 63?? ,
    ?(3)o 28.9??, ?(4)o 93.7??, ?2 60 Rpm 6.283
    rad/s a20
  • Acceleration constants
  • a3o (CD AF) / (AE BD) 5.946 rad/s2
  • a4o (CE BF) / (AE BD) 10.002 rad/s2
  • a3c (CD AF) / (AE BD) 9.829 rad/s2
  • a4c (CE BF) / (AE BD) 5.773 rad/s2

OPEN CROSSED
A 51.153 -47.181
B 38.679 -59.655
C 281.672 313.940
D -3.316 -20.026
E 70.028 53.304
F -449.57 -693.509
13
Acceleration point analysis
  • AA a a2 (-sin ?(2) j cos ?(2)) - a ?22( cos
    ?(2) j sin ?(2))
  • AA 14 (0) 14 6.2832 ( cos (63) j sin
    (63)) 552.665 f/s2 _at_ -117 degrees
  • AB c a4 (-sin ?(4) j cos ?(4) ) - c ?42 (cos
    ?(4) j sin ?(4) )
  • AB 51.26 10.002 ( -sin (93,7) j cos (93.7)
    ) 51.26 1.0632 ( cos (93.7) j sin (93.7) )
  • AB 515.96 f/s2 _at_ -169.9 degrees
  • ABA b a3 (-sin ?(3) j cos ?(3) ) b ?32
    (cos ?(3) j sin ?(3) )
  • ABA 80 5.946 (-sin (28.9) j cos (28.9))
    80 -.62042 ( cos (28.9) j sin (28.9) )
  • ABA 476.68 f/s2 _at_ 115.2 degrees

14
Working Model
15
Position Analysis
16
Velocity Analysis
17
Acceleration Analysis
18
Resources Used
  • Norton L (2004). DESIGN OF MACHINERY. Chapters
    2-7.
  • http//www.howstuffworks.com
  • http//images.google.com/
  • http//academic.emporia.edu/aberjame/field/flint/o
    il1.jpg

19
Problems
  • The project it self was understandable, but there
    where major problems with working with the
    computer modeling programs
  • 1 AutoCAD design, 1 pro-e design, 2 working model
    to get one report
  • Exporting from working model was difficult
  • Importing to working model is imposable

20
Results
  • The results of our analysis were found using the
    analytical analysis learned in class for the DOF,
    position, velocity and acceleration. The results
    of the analysis were first found using the basic
    equations in our book. To check our work we
    decided to use calculator programs first, which
    showed our answers were perfect for the specific
    angle between the ground and bar a. To be sure
    our answers would be right for more than one
    single angle, Working Model and Excel were very
    useful for finding the positions, velocities, and
    accelerations of the mechanism through the cranks
    full rotation.

21
Conclusion
  • The results we came up with were very accurate
    but difficult and time consuming, especially when
    converting from paper to the computer
  • Using Mat Lab would have dramatically reduced the
    amount of time in our calculations, and would
    make our math more readable for the audience.
  • Using a radial pump to get the oil would save
    space.
  • Solar panels would allow to pump oil in hard to
    get to places.
  • It is a good and rugged design and has been used
    for over 50 years.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com