Share Based Payment GEO debate 10 January 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Share Based Payment GEO debate 10 January 2002

Description:

What happened to July 2000 discussion paper? G4 1 became an IASB project ... Lapsed options. Re-pricing. Cash alternatives. SARs. Other forms of share based payment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: bac27
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Share Based Payment GEO debate 10 January 2002


1
Share Based PaymentGEO debate 10 January 2002
  • Alan M Judes

2
What happened to July 2000 discussion paper?
  • G41 became an IASB project
  • paper reissued in name of IASB
  • working towards an exposure draft
  • Political pressure
  • Financial pressure senators writing to chairman
    of trustees
  • Standard Poors until IASB reports there will
    be charge for share based payments
  • ABI/NAPF/FMA strongly supportive of paper

3
Current Opinions
  • IASB Agenda - top of agenda, series of
    consultation meetings ending 15 December 2001
  • AIMR Survey - disclosure/expense required
  • FEI Lobbyists - Financial Executives
    International - spent 75m against FAS 123
  • European Union - want a standard to be applied
    in EU
  • South African consultation

4
Overview of G41 Proposals
  • Recognition of transaction
  • Measurement basis
  • Measurement date
  • Allocation over performance period

5
No Cost Therefore No Charge
  • For new issue shares theres no cash paid out
  • But there is a transaction
  • - the purchase of employee services
  • - the issue of an equity investment
  • Other non-cash, share based transactions are
    recognised e.g. business transactions
  • There is a cost to shareholders

6
Warren Buffett
  • If options are not a form of compensation, what
    are they?
  • If compensation is not an expense what is it?
  • If expenses should not go into calculation of
    earnings, where should they go?

7
OK its Employee Remuneration, but
  • EPS is hit twice - numerator and denominator
  • so it should be, company can issue shares and pay
    appreciation to employee
  • Adverse economic consequences inhibit
    incentives and increase taxes
  • accountants simply report what happens
  • truth and fairness in financial reporting

8
Significance of Issue
  • Pervasiveness 499 of Fortune 500
  • Truth in reporting good disclosure does not
    make up for poor accounting
  • Corporate Governance
  • Best deal for investors many UK companies get
    zero tax deduction

9
Measurement Basis
  • Historical cost
  • Intrinsic value
  • Fair value
  • option pricing model
  • non transferability
  • unlisted companies

10
Measurement Date
  • Paper supports vesting date
  • Grant date
  • Service date
  • Vesting date
  • Exercise date

11
Allocation of Charge
  • Accrue over performance period
  • Estimate at balance sheet date
  • Include in equity (shareholder funds)
  • Finalise at vesting date

12
Other Issues
  • Lapsed options
  • Re-pricing
  • Cash alternatives
  • SARs
  • Other forms of share based payment

13
Discussion in Johannesurg last month
  • Recognise? - generally very much in favour
  • Fair value measurement? - yes
  • Option pricing models? - yes
  • Vesting date vs other dates? - argument
  • Accrual over performance period? - yes

14
Final slide!
  • Why do companies grant options to employees?
  • attract, retain, reward, motivate, pay in
    non-cash form
  • How should one account for the transfer of value
    of assets to employees?
  • as a charge against income
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com