Title: Voice Quality
1Voice Quality
John Horrocks (DTI)
Email RJHorrocks_at_cs.com Direct line 01483
797807 Date 20 November 2001 www.horrocks.co.uk
2Inter-relationship of factors
3Approach to Characterizing Speech QoS
- QoS is defined subjectively as perceived by the
user, - It is end to end (e.g. mouth to ear for speech),
- A number of QoS Service Classes are defined,
- Classes include guaranteed quality
(statistically) and unguaranteed (best effort).
4Specifying the TIPHON Speech QoS Classes
(MOSgt2.5)
(MOSgt3.6)
(MOSgt4.0)
(MOS 5Excellent, 4Good, 3 Fair, 2 Poor,
1Bad)
5TIPHON QoS Classes
High
Medium
Acceptable
Best effort
6Todays Internet QoS Model
Application Plane
Transport Plane
7Tomorrows Internet QoS Model
Application Plane
Transport Plane
QoS Signalling if same technology eg RSVP
8Problems with Todays Approach
9The TIPHON Application Controlled Approach to QoS
Application Plane
Transport Plane
Packet Flow
QoS Signalling
Call Signalling
10Advantages of the TIPHON Approach to End-to-end
QoS
- CLEAR BUSINESS MODEL
- The Application Service Provider is in the
driving seat. End-to-end (inter-domain) QoS
control takes place within the Application Plane.
(Between Service Providers) - Required end-to-end QoS levels are established
within the Application Plane (Between the End
User and Service Provider) - Transport Domains (Operators) provide a QoS
service to the associated Service Domains
(Service Providers). QoS controlwithin a
Transport Domain is the responsibility of the
Operator of that domain
11Advantages of the TIPHON Appoach to End-to-end
QoS (Cont)
- OTHER ADVANTAGES
- A common interface can be defined between a
Transport Domain and its associated Service
Domain even though different QoS mechanisms may
be present within the Transport Plane - No QoS information need be exchanged between the
End User and Network Operator or between Network
Operators - Application Controlled Firewalls and NATS can be
accommodated
12Mixed Transport QoS Mechanisms
Media Flow
QoS Signalling
Call Signalling
13RSVP Example
TRMTransport Resource Manager TPE Transport
Policy
14Diff Serv Example
15Summary
16 Documents
17NICC VoIP Quality Group
- Working about a year to revise UK transmission
plan for public networks - Inputs from TIPHON
- Aims to complete by Easter 2002
- Assume normal NTP at customer premises
18Progress so far
- Delay is the most critical impairment
- Everyone should use G.711 standard PSTN coding
to use less delay - Minimise speech frame size and frames/packet
- Use RTP header compression and data packet
fragmentation - Keep packet loss below 1 overall
- Need to minimise the number of IP-Circuit
switched transitions, but IP based
interconnection will develop only slowly so this
will be difficult - Avoid transcoding
19Comments
- Some routings involving number portability and
non-geographic services are very tortuous - Use on onward routing solution
- Lack of direct interconnection routes
- Will need a statistical approach
- Not tackled the design / apportionment issue yet
- Still quite a long way to gowith some tough
decisions to come