Title: Interlinkages Among the Chemical Conventions
1Inter-linkages Among the Chemical Conventions
- Jerry Velasquez, Ph.D.
- United Nations University
- jerryv_at_hq.unu.edu
2The United Nations University
- A Think Tank for the United Nations
- HQ based in Tokyo, Japan
- Has 15 research and training centres / programmes
all over the world - Governing Council composed of academics
- Funded through endowment
- Main Programmes Environment / Peace and
Governance
3Outline of Presentation
- Inter-linkages between Basel, Rotterdam,
Stockholm and other related conventions - National and regional approaches on
inter-linkages in Asia and the Pacific - Recommendations
- Proposals for partnerships
4Cradle to Grave
Waste management
New chemicals
Environmental releases
Import / export controls
Hazard communication
Replacement
Existing chemicals
5- Existing chemicals
- The Rotterdam Convention (Article 5), obliges
Parties to notify the secretariat of final
regulatory actions taken in respect of banned or
severely restricted chemicals, for the
information of other Parties and possible listing
under the Convention. Developing countries and
countries with economies in transition may also
propose the listing of severely hazardous
pesticide formulations (Article 6). - The Stockholm Convention (Article 4.4) requires
Parties with regulatory and assessment schemes to
take into consideration the POPs screening
criteria set out in Annex D of the Convention
when assessing pesticides or industrial chemicals
currently in use. Parties must eliminate from
production and use certain chemicals already
listed in the Convention (Article 3).
6- New chemicals
- The Stockholm Convention (Article 4.3) requires
Parties with regulatory and assessment schemes to
regulate with the aim of preventing the
production and use of new pesticides or new
industrial chemicals which exhibit the
characteristics of POPs.
7- Import/export controls
- The Basel Convention imposes strict conditions on
the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes
(Art. 4 and 6). In particular it prohibits the
export of hazardous wastes from OECD to non-OECD
countries (Decisions II/12 and III/1). Trade with
non-parties is generally not permitted (Art.
4.5). - The Rotterdam Convention (Art. 10 to 12) will
establish a Prior Informed Consent Procedure
based on the earlier voluntary guidelines. - The Stockholm Convention (Art. 3.2) restricts the
import and export of POPs to cases where, for
example, the purpose is environmentally sound
disposal. It also requires that POPs not be
transported across international boundaries
without taking into account relevant
international rules, standards and guidelines
(Art. 6.1).
8- Waste management
- The Basel Convention (Article 4) requires each
Party to minimize waste generation and to ensure,
to the extent possible, the availability of
disposal facilities within its own territory. In
December 1999, COP5 adopted the Basel Declaration
on Environmentally Sound Management (underpins
the purpose of the Convention). - The Stockholm Convention (Article 6) obliges
Parties to develop strategies for identifying
POPs wastes, and to manage these in an
environmentally sound manner. The POPs content of
wastes is generally to be destroyed or
irreversibly transformed. The Basel Convention
Technical Working Group is developing technical
guidelines on POPs wastes as part of its work
programme and at the request of the Conference of
Plenipotentiaries that adopted the Stockholm
Convention.
9- Environmental releases
- The Stockholm Convention requires Parties to take
measures to reduce or eliminate releases of POPs
from intentional production and use (Article 3),
unintentional production (Article 5) and
stockpiles and wastes (Article 6). Concepts of
Best Available Techniques (BAT) and Best
Environmental Practices (BEP) are to be further
elaborated by the Conference of the Parties.
10- Hazard communication
- Provisions are made for the obligatory
communication of hazard information under the
Basel Convention (Article 4.2 f) - The Rotterdam Convention (Article 5.1) and
- The Stockholm Convention (Article 10).
11- Replacement
- The Stockholm Convention requires information
exchange and research on POPs alternatives
(Articles 9 and 11). It obliges each Party using
DDT to develop an Action plan, including for
implementation of alternative products (Annex B).
12Substances covered
The Basel Convention covers hazardous wastes that
are explosive, flammable, poisonous, infectious,
corrosive, toxic, or eco-toxic. The categories of
wastes and the hazardous characteristics are set
out in Annexes I to III of the Convention. Lists
of specific wastes characterized as hazardous or
non-hazardous are in Annexes VIII and IX.
The Rotterdam Convention covers 2,4,5-T, aldrin,
captafol, chlordane, chlordimeform,
chlorobenzilate, DDT, 1,2-di-bromoethane (EDB),
dieldrin, dinoseb, fluoroacetamide, HCH,
heptachlor, hexachloro-benzene, lindane, mercury
compounds, and penta-chlorophenol, plus certain
formulations of methamido-phos, methylparathion,
monocrotophos, parathion, and phosphamidon.
Crocidolite, polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs),
polychlorinated bi-phenyls (PCBs),
polychlo-rinated terphenyls (PCTs), tris (2,3
dibromo-propyl) phosphate.
The Stockholm Convention covers pesticides
aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor,
Hexachloroben-zene (HCB), mirex, toxa-phene, and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Continued use
of the pesticide DDT is allowed for disease
vector control until safe, affordable and
effective alternatives are in place. Countries
must make determined efforts to identify label
and remove PCB containing equipment from use by
2025. Also covers unintentionally produced POPs
such as the industrial byproducts dioxins and
furans.
13Areas for Possible Synergies
- The Basel Convention
- Amendments/Bodies
- Ban Amendment, 1995
- List of hazardous / non-hazardous wastes, 1999
- Technical assistance regional centres
- - Article 14 provide for regional centres for
training and technology - transfer.
- - Basel has a Technical
- Cooperation Trust Fund
- The Rotterdam Convention
- Amendments/Bodies
- Future creation of a Chemicals Review Committee
- Assess if chemicals or pesticide should be made
subject to the Prior Informed Consent procedure.
(In February 2002, Interim Committee recommended
3 pesticides (monocrotophos, Granox TBC/Spinox T
and DNOC) asbestos added to Convention)
The Stockholm Convention Amendments/Bodies Future
creation of a Persistent Organic Pollutants
Review Committee - assess chemicals that
have been proposed for addition to the
Convention. Technical assistance regional
centres - Article 12 provide for regional centres
for training and technology transfer. -
Stockholm (Articles 13 14) envisages a
financial mechanism, to be operated by the
Global Environment Facility on an interim basis.
14Some relevant regional agreements
- Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air
Pollution, LRTAP (1979) and its Aarhus Protocol
on POPs (1998) - Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the
Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution (1976) and
its Izmir Protocol (1996) - Waigani Convention to Ban the Importation into
Forum Island Countries of Hazardous and
Radioactive Wastes and to Control the
Transboundary Movement and Management of
Hazardous Wastes within the South Pacific Region
(1995) - Bamako Convention on the Ban of the Import into
Africa and the Control of Transboundary Movement
of Hazardous Wastes within Africa (1991) - Cartagena Convention for the Protection and
Development of the Marine Environment in the
Wider Caribbean Region (1983) - Central American Regional Agreement on
Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes (1992)
15Other relevant agreements
- London Convention Convention on the Prevention
of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and
Other Matter (1972) plus the 1996 Protocol to the
London Convention - International Convention for the Prevention of
Pollution from Ships (1973) as amended by the
Protocol of 1978 - International Convention Relating to Intervention
on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution
Casualties (1969) - International Convention on Oil Pollution
Preparedness, Response and Cooperation (1990) - International Convention on Civil Liability for
Oil Pollution Damage (1992) - International Convention on the Establishment of
an International Fund for Compensation for Oil
Pollution Damage (1992) - International Convention on Liability and
Compensation for Damage in Connection with the
Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by
Sea (1996) - United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(1982)
16Other related issues
- Other Conventions
- CBD, CMS, Ramsar, CITES
- Other Issues
- Health, Forestry, Culture, Labor, Trade, Waste
Management, Security, Industrial Development,
Socio-economic development, Local sustainable
developmentand so on
17Synergies Where do we start?
- Scale
- Global, Regional, National
- Approach
- Cooperation Models
- Clustering
- Strengthening of UNEP
- Expand the Global Ministers Environment Forum
(GMEF) - Reforming existing UN bodies
- Issue Management (Environment Management Group,
EMG) - Centralized Models
- Building eco-competence in WTO
- World Environment Organization centralized model
(ILO/WTO) - Enforcement Model
- Reform UN Trusteeship Council
- Expanding mandate of UN Security Council
- Create a World Environment Court
18Clustering
- Issue or ecosystem based - Climate, bio-related,
chemicals, trade-related, ocean - Impacts - Deforestation, land degradation, skin
cancer, etc. - Goods - Agricultural products, industrial
products, etc. - Region based
- Functional - Capacity building, information,
meetings, assessment, etc.
19Challenges to Synergies
- Inter-linkages concept assumes more capacity in
national governments than may exist - Centralization vs. Decentralization
- Also, incentives (e.g., financial), may sometimes
promote independent action rather than harmonized
action - Those negotiating agreements may also not be
involved in the implementation of the agreements
that they have negotiated - To use a regional approach to inter-linkages, it
becomes a precondition that countries within a
region have all ratified the MEAs that are to be
synergized
20Why Focus at National and Regional Levels?
- International instruments are reflections of
national priorities - Its at the national level where country
priorities can be best voiced - Its at the national level where implementation
ultimately occurs - Regional instruments and organizations assist
global conventions goals - Other organizations are already well positioned
to look at global level
21Inter-linkages Case Studies
- 14 Countries in Asia and Pacific
- Palau, Vanuatu, Papua New Guinea, Cook Islands in
Pacific - 10 ASEAN Countries in Asia
- Done together with relevant regional
organizations and hosted by governments - Principles of implementation
- Demand driven
- Value added
- Support sustainable development
- Follow the principle of subsidiarity
- Any initiatives should only be taken after
benefit analysis
22Some Findings (1 of 2)
- Institutions
- Vertical challenges
- Within departments and ministries
- Between central government and provinces
- Between global and national institutions
- Horizontal challenges
- Between line agencies
- Ad hoc nature
- Structure but no clear functions
- Capacity
- Lack of capacity and sustainability
- Negotiations, ratification and implementation
23Some Findings (2 of 2)
- Information
- Assessment, storage, analysis and reporting of
data - Knowledge management (availability, sharing,
contribution to overall A21 goals) - Legal
- Legal framework
- Resourcing
- Severe lack of resources
- Challenges in seeking resources
- Stakeholder partnerships
24Some Recommendations
- Rule making ? Implementation
- Structure ? Functions
- Clarification and codification of roles and
functions - Function centric capacity building
- Knowledge management
- Compliance and enforcement
- Assessment and data management
- Resourcing
25Possible Cooperation
- Join activities in South Asia?
- Examples
- National and regional case studies
- Chemicals CD-ROM for SPREP
- MEAs CD-ROM for PNG
- Integrated capacity building in ASEAN
- Resourcing workshops in PICs
- Knowledge management workshops in PNG