Interlinkages Among the Chemical Conventions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Interlinkages Among the Chemical Conventions

Description:

Has 15 research and training centres / programmes all over ... Also covers unintentionally produced POPs such as the industrial byproducts. dioxins and furans. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: J563
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interlinkages Among the Chemical Conventions


1
Inter-linkages Among the Chemical Conventions
  • Jerry Velasquez, Ph.D.
  • United Nations University
  • jerryv_at_hq.unu.edu

2
The United Nations University
  • A Think Tank for the United Nations
  • HQ based in Tokyo, Japan
  • Has 15 research and training centres / programmes
    all over the world
  • Governing Council composed of academics
  • Funded through endowment
  • Main Programmes Environment / Peace and
    Governance

3
Outline of Presentation
  • Inter-linkages between Basel, Rotterdam,
    Stockholm and other related conventions
  • National and regional approaches on
    inter-linkages in Asia and the Pacific
  • Recommendations
  • Proposals for partnerships

4
Cradle to Grave
Waste management
New chemicals
Environmental releases
Import / export controls
Hazard communication
Replacement
Existing chemicals
5
  • Existing chemicals
  • The Rotterdam Convention (Article 5), obliges
    Parties to notify the secretariat of final
    regulatory actions taken in respect of banned or
    severely restricted chemicals, for the
    information of other Parties and possible listing
    under the Convention. Developing countries and
    countries with economies in transition may also
    propose the listing of severely hazardous
    pesticide formulations (Article 6).
  • The Stockholm Convention (Article 4.4) requires
    Parties with regulatory and assessment schemes to
    take into consideration the POPs screening
    criteria set out in Annex D of the Convention
    when assessing pesticides or industrial chemicals
    currently in use. Parties must eliminate from
    production and use certain chemicals already
    listed in the Convention (Article 3).

6
  • New chemicals
  • The Stockholm Convention (Article 4.3) requires
    Parties with regulatory and assessment schemes to
    regulate with the aim of preventing the
    production and use of new pesticides or new
    industrial chemicals which exhibit the
    characteristics of POPs.

7
  • Import/export controls
  • The Basel Convention imposes strict conditions on
    the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes
    (Art. 4 and 6). In particular it prohibits the
    export of hazardous wastes from OECD to non-OECD
    countries (Decisions II/12 and III/1). Trade with
    non-parties is generally not permitted (Art.
    4.5).
  • The Rotterdam Convention (Art. 10 to 12) will
    establish a Prior Informed Consent Procedure
    based on the earlier voluntary guidelines.
  • The Stockholm Convention (Art. 3.2) restricts the
    import and export of POPs to cases where, for
    example, the purpose is environmentally sound
    disposal. It also requires that POPs not be
    transported across international boundaries
    without taking into account relevant
    international rules, standards and guidelines
    (Art. 6.1).

8
  • Waste management
  • The Basel Convention (Article 4) requires each
    Party to minimize waste generation and to ensure,
    to the extent possible, the availability of
    disposal facilities within its own territory. In
    December 1999, COP5 adopted the Basel Declaration
    on Environmentally Sound Management (underpins
    the purpose of the Convention).
  • The Stockholm Convention (Article 6) obliges
    Parties to develop strategies for identifying
    POPs wastes, and to manage these in an
    environmentally sound manner. The POPs content of
    wastes is generally to be destroyed or
    irreversibly transformed. The Basel Convention
    Technical Working Group is developing technical
    guidelines on POPs wastes as part of its work
    programme and at the request of the Conference of
    Plenipotentiaries that adopted the Stockholm
    Convention.

9
  • Environmental releases
  • The Stockholm Convention requires Parties to take
    measures to reduce or eliminate releases of POPs
    from intentional production and use (Article 3),
    unintentional production (Article 5) and
    stockpiles and wastes (Article 6). Concepts of
    Best Available Techniques (BAT) and Best
    Environmental Practices (BEP) are to be further
    elaborated by the Conference of the Parties.

10
  • Hazard communication
  • Provisions are made for the obligatory
    communication of hazard information under the
    Basel Convention (Article 4.2 f)
  • The Rotterdam Convention (Article 5.1) and
  • The Stockholm Convention (Article 10).

11
  • Replacement
  • The Stockholm Convention requires information
    exchange and research on POPs alternatives
    (Articles 9 and 11). It obliges each Party using
    DDT to develop an Action plan, including for
    implementation of alternative products (Annex B).

12
Substances covered
The Basel Convention covers hazardous wastes that
are explosive, flammable, poisonous, infectious,
corrosive, toxic, or eco-toxic. The categories of
wastes and the hazardous characteristics are set
out in Annexes I to III of the Convention. Lists
of specific wastes characterized as hazardous or
non-hazardous are in Annexes VIII and IX.
The Rotterdam Convention covers 2,4,5-T, aldrin,
captafol, chlordane, chlordimeform,
chlorobenzilate, DDT, 1,2-di-bromoethane (EDB),
dieldrin, dinoseb, fluoroacetamide, HCH,
heptachlor, hexachloro-benzene, lindane, mercury
compounds, and penta-chlorophenol, plus certain
formulations of methamido-phos, methylparathion,
monocrotophos, parathion, and phosphamidon.
Crocidolite, polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs),
polychlorinated bi-phenyls (PCBs),
polychlo-rinated terphenyls (PCTs), tris (2,3
dibromo-propyl) phosphate.
The Stockholm Convention covers pesticides
aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor,
Hexachloroben-zene (HCB), mirex, toxa-phene, and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Continued use
of the pesticide DDT is allowed for disease
vector control until safe, affordable and
effective alternatives are in place. Countries
must make determined efforts to identify label
and remove PCB containing equipment from use by
2025. Also covers unintentionally produced POPs
such as the industrial byproducts dioxins and
furans.
13
Areas for Possible Synergies
  • The Basel Convention
  • Amendments/Bodies
  • Ban Amendment, 1995
  • List of hazardous / non-hazardous wastes, 1999
  • Technical assistance regional centres
  • - Article 14 provide for regional centres for
    training and technology
  • transfer.
  • - Basel has a Technical
  • Cooperation Trust Fund
  • The Rotterdam Convention
  • Amendments/Bodies
  • Future creation of a Chemicals Review Committee
  • Assess if chemicals or pesticide should be made
    subject to the Prior Informed Consent procedure.
    (In February 2002, Interim Committee recommended
    3 pesticides (monocrotophos, Granox TBC/Spinox T
    and DNOC) asbestos added to Convention)

The Stockholm Convention Amendments/Bodies Future
creation of a Persistent Organic Pollutants
Review Committee - assess chemicals that
have been proposed for addition to the
Convention. Technical assistance regional
centres - Article 12 provide for regional centres
for training and technology transfer. -
Stockholm (Articles 13 14) envisages a
financial mechanism, to be operated by the
Global Environment Facility on an interim basis.
14
Some relevant regional agreements
  • Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air
    Pollution, LRTAP (1979) and its Aarhus Protocol
    on POPs (1998)
  • Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the
    Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution (1976) and
    its Izmir Protocol (1996)
  • Waigani Convention to Ban the Importation into
    Forum Island Countries of Hazardous and
    Radioactive Wastes and to Control the
    Transboundary Movement and Management of
    Hazardous Wastes within the South Pacific Region
    (1995)
  • Bamako Convention on the Ban of the Import into
    Africa and the Control of Transboundary Movement
    of Hazardous Wastes within Africa (1991)
  • Cartagena Convention for the Protection and
    Development of the Marine Environment in the
    Wider Caribbean Region (1983)
  • Central American Regional Agreement on
    Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes (1992)

15
Other relevant agreements
  • London Convention Convention on the Prevention
    of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and
    Other Matter (1972) plus the 1996 Protocol to the
    London Convention
  • International Convention for the Prevention of
    Pollution from Ships (1973) as amended by the
    Protocol of 1978
  • International Convention Relating to Intervention
    on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution
    Casualties (1969)
  • International Convention on Oil Pollution
    Preparedness, Response and Cooperation (1990)
  • International Convention on Civil Liability for
    Oil Pollution Damage (1992)
  • International Convention on the Establishment of
    an International Fund for Compensation for Oil
    Pollution Damage (1992)
  • International Convention on Liability and
    Compensation for Damage in Connection with the
    Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by
    Sea (1996)
  • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
    (1982)

16
Other related issues
  • Other Conventions
  • CBD, CMS, Ramsar, CITES
  • Other Issues
  • Health, Forestry, Culture, Labor, Trade, Waste
    Management, Security, Industrial Development,
    Socio-economic development, Local sustainable
    developmentand so on

17
Synergies Where do we start?
  • Scale
  • Global, Regional, National
  • Approach
  • Cooperation Models
  • Clustering
  • Strengthening of UNEP
  • Expand the Global Ministers Environment Forum
    (GMEF)
  • Reforming existing UN bodies
  • Issue Management (Environment Management Group,
    EMG)
  • Centralized Models
  • Building eco-competence in WTO
  • World Environment Organization centralized model
    (ILO/WTO)
  • Enforcement Model
  • Reform UN Trusteeship Council
  • Expanding mandate of UN Security Council
  • Create a World Environment Court

18
Clustering
  • Issue or ecosystem based - Climate, bio-related,
    chemicals, trade-related, ocean
  • Impacts - Deforestation, land degradation, skin
    cancer, etc.
  • Goods - Agricultural products, industrial
    products, etc.
  • Region based
  • Functional - Capacity building, information,
    meetings, assessment, etc.

19
Challenges to Synergies
  • Inter-linkages concept assumes more capacity in
    national governments than may exist
  • Centralization vs. Decentralization
  • Also, incentives (e.g., financial), may sometimes
    promote independent action rather than harmonized
    action
  • Those negotiating agreements may also not be
    involved in the implementation of the agreements
    that they have negotiated
  • To use a regional approach to inter-linkages, it
    becomes a precondition that countries within a
    region have all ratified the MEAs that are to be
    synergized

20
Why Focus at National and Regional Levels?
  • International instruments are reflections of
    national priorities
  • Its at the national level where country
    priorities can be best voiced
  • Its at the national level where implementation
    ultimately occurs
  • Regional instruments and organizations assist
    global conventions goals
  • Other organizations are already well positioned
    to look at global level

21
Inter-linkages Case Studies
  • 14 Countries in Asia and Pacific
  • Palau, Vanuatu, Papua New Guinea, Cook Islands in
    Pacific
  • 10 ASEAN Countries in Asia
  • Done together with relevant regional
    organizations and hosted by governments
  • Principles of implementation
  • Demand driven
  • Value added
  • Support sustainable development
  • Follow the principle of subsidiarity
  • Any initiatives should only be taken after
    benefit analysis

22
Some Findings (1 of 2)
  • Institutions
  • Vertical challenges
  • Within departments and ministries
  • Between central government and provinces
  • Between global and national institutions
  • Horizontal challenges
  • Between line agencies
  • Ad hoc nature
  • Structure but no clear functions
  • Capacity
  • Lack of capacity and sustainability
  • Negotiations, ratification and implementation

23
Some Findings (2 of 2)
  • Information
  • Assessment, storage, analysis and reporting of
    data
  • Knowledge management (availability, sharing,
    contribution to overall A21 goals)
  • Legal
  • Legal framework
  • Resourcing
  • Severe lack of resources
  • Challenges in seeking resources
  • Stakeholder partnerships

24
Some Recommendations
  • Rule making ? Implementation
  • Structure ? Functions
  • Clarification and codification of roles and
    functions
  • Function centric capacity building
  • Knowledge management
  • Compliance and enforcement
  • Assessment and data management
  • Resourcing

25
Possible Cooperation
  • Join activities in South Asia?
  • Examples
  • National and regional case studies
  • Chemicals CD-ROM for SPREP
  • MEAs CD-ROM for PNG
  • Integrated capacity building in ASEAN
  • Resourcing workshops in PICs
  • Knowledge management workshops in PNG
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com