The NSDL: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The NSDL:

Description:

... (Dave Fulker), Columbia University (Kate Wittenberg) and Cornell University (Bill ... Organizational agreements cover the ground rules for access, for changing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: CarolTe2
Category:
Tags: nsdl | ground | kate

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The NSDL:


1
The NSDL A Case Study in Interoperability William
Y. Arms Cornell University
2
Acknowledgement and Disclaimer
The NSDL is a program of the National Science
Foundation's Directorate for Education and Human
Resources, Division of Undergraduate
Education. The NSDL Core Integration is a
collaboration between the University Center for
Atmospheric Research (Dave Fulker), Columbia
University (Kate Wittenberg) and Cornell
University (Bill Arms). The ideas discussed in
this talk do not represent the official views of
the NSF or the Core Integration team.
3
Research Funding Europe and USA
Europe Grant is awarded to carry out the research
plan specified in proposal USA Grant is awarded
to carry out research in the area described in
the proposal, but is not expected to follow the
precise plan.
4
New Initiatives during a Grant
Program Activity University Gigabit
testbed Mosaic Illinois CSTR Lycos Carnegie
Mellon DLI-1 Google PageRank Stanford DLI-2 Open
Archives Initiative Cornell
Examples of significant partial funding that was
not envisaged in the proposal.
5
NSF-funded Research Programs
New ideas
New ideas
Research
6
The NSDL Program
NSF's objective Build a comprehensive digital
library for all aspects of science
education NSF's approach Solicitation encouraged
wide diversity of proposals divided into general
categories Best 60 proposals funded -- more to
follow Grants allow projects flexibility Result
A splendid set of projects A challenge in
interoperability!
7
NSDL Collections Funded by the NSF (a)
Focused collections
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
NSDL Collections Funded by the NSF (b)
Aggregates and federations
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
NSDL Service Projects Funded by the NSF
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
NSDL Core Integration Team Funded by the NSF
20
Responsibility without Authority
Core Integration

Budget 4-6 million Staff 25 -
30 Management Diffuse

How can a small team, without direct management
control, create a very large-scale digital
library?
21
How Big might the NSDL be?
  • All branches of science, all levels of
    education, very broadly defined
  • Five year targets
  • 1,000,000 different users
  • 10,000,000 digital objects
  • 10,000 to 100,000 independent sites

22
The NSDL program funds only a fraction of the
relevant collections.
Collections
23
Every Collection is Different
24
The Core Integration Task ...
... to provide a coherent set of services across
great diversity.
25
A Spectrum of Interoperability
26
Approaches to interoperability
The conventional approach ? Wise people develop
standards protocols, formats, etc. ? Everybody
implements the standards. ? This creates an
integrated, distributed system.
Unfortunately ... ? Standards are expensive to
adopt. ? Concepts are continually changing. ?
Systems are continually changing. ? Different
people have different ideas

27
Interoperability is about agreements
Technical agreements cover formats, protocols,
security systems so that messages can be
exchanged, etc.   Content agreements cover the
data and metadata, and include semantic
agreements on the interpretation of the messages.
  Organizational agreements cover the ground
rules for access, for changing collections and
services, payment, authentication, etc. The
challenge is to create incentives for independent
digital libraries to adopt agreements
28
Function versus cost of acceptance
Cost of acceptance
Few adopters
Many adopters
Function
29
Example textual mark-up
Cost of acceptance
SGML
XML
HTML
Function
ASCII
30
Example security
Cost of acceptance
Public key infrastructure
Login ID and password
IP address
Function
31
Levels of interoperability
Level Agreements Example Federation Strict use
of standards AACR, MARC (syntax, semantic, Z
39.50 and business) Harvesting Digital
libraries expose Open Archives metadata
simple metadata harvesting protocol and
registry Gathering Digital libraries do not
Web crawlers cooperate services
must and search engines seek out information
32
  • Metadata Strategy
  • Metadata is expensive
  • The NSDL cannot afford to create it manually

33
  • Metadata Strategy Support eight standard
    formats
  • Collect all existing metadata in these
    formats
  • Provide crosswalks to Dublin Core
  • Expose records in the metadata repository for
    others to harvest
  • Concentrate on collection-level metadata
  • Use automatic generation to augment
    item-level metadata

34
The Metadata Repository
Services
The metadata repository is a resource for service
providers. It holds information about every
collection and item known to the NSDL.
Users
Metadata repository
Collections
35
Services Strategy
36
The Metadata Repository as a Resource
  • Records are exposed through Open Archives
    Initiative harvesting protocol.
  • Core Integration team will provide some services
    based on the metadata repository.
  • The architecture encourages others to build
    services.

37
Example Search Service
Metadata repository
Portal
OAI
SDLIP
Search andDiscoveryServices
Portal
http
Portal
Collections
James Allan, Bruce Croft (University of
Massachusetts, Amherst)
38
  • Research Challenges
  • Extending the Architecture to Support Greater
    Riches
  • ? Federations with rich sets of agreements
    (e.g., MARC, Z39.50)
  • ? Rich object models (e.g., interactive,
    dynamic, continuous time)
  • ? Language tools (e.g, thesaurus, gazetteer)
  • ... and Lesser Riches
  • ? Web crawling
  • ? Automated quality control
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com