Example of international arbitration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Example of international arbitration

Description:

Telia/Sonera controlled LMT: largest mobile operator in Latvia. Telia/Sonera offer to abandon claim in return for LMT shares so far ignored. Arbitration process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: ncc9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Example of international arbitration


1
Example of international arbitration
  • Bill Wigglesworth
  • Interconnection, costs and pricing workshop,
    Abuja, Nigeria

2
Government of Latvia versus Tilts Consortium
  • Exclusive franchise for fixed voice telephony and
    rebuilding Latvian telecommunications
  • Awarded to Tilts Consortium (Cable Wireless and
    Telecom Finland) 1993
  • Lattelekom umbrella agreement signed 1994
  • Included
  • 20 years exclusivity network and services
    development programme price change formula
    disputes subject to international arbitration

3
Unravelling of agreement
  • Price change formula (first 3 years) falsified by
    events strong Lat stable inflation
  • Regulated by Telecommunications Tariff Council
    (TTC) under terms of Act, not agreement
    justification and effects on users
  • Slippage on Lattelekom investment plans
  • 1998 Announcement of ending of exclusivity from
    January 2003, under WTO commitments
  • Network competition an EU requirement

4
Further developments
  • Departure of Cable Wireless 1998
  • Telecom Finland became Sonera
  • Sonera decision to go to international
    arbitration
  • Sonera merged with Telia of Sweden 2002
  • Telia/Sonera controlled LMT largest mobile
    operator in Latvia
  • Telia/Sonera offer to abandon claim in return for
    LMT shares so far ignored

5
Arbitration process
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) court of
    international arbitration in Stockholm
  • Initial submission of Tilts (including CW)
    seeking compensation for loss of exclusivity
  • Latvia Government rebuttal, on grounds of failure
    to carry out full improvement programme
  • Resubmission by Tilts response by Latvia

6
Current position
  • Both sides supported by experts, giving
    independent views to arbitration panel
  • Total sums claimed in order of US500m
  • Loss of exclusivity and loss of revenue from
    price change delays versus economic effects of
    late network development
  • Value of on-going monopoly versus commercial
    prospects in competitive sector
  • Costly process
  • Hearing due April 2004
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com