Title: Emerging markets for ecosystem services
1Emerging markets for ecosystem services
2Outline
- Ecosystem services emerging markets
- State of carbon cap and trade markets
- Whats the deal with forest carbon?
- Ecotrust Forests an example of a forest carbon
strategy - Parting thoughts
3Ecosystem service markets in forests
- Carbon sequestration/storage
- Habitat banking for forest-dependent species and
habitats (Pacific salmon, spotted owl, oak
woodland, floodplain forest) - Wetland banking (forested wetlands)
- Flood control/water storage
- Water quality temperature reduction
- Scenic vistas
- Passive and active recreational opportunities
- Moderate temperature and rainfall
- Wild mushroom and plant harvesting
- while providing for timber, pulp, fuel, and other
commercial harvest opportunities, and jobs,
management and ownership opportunities for
millions
4Integrated production of commodities and
ecosystem services, Australia
Source David Brand, New Forests
5The early markets
SOx and NOx trading
Transferable fishing quotas
Mitigation banking
6Carbon market cap trade components
Enabling legislation Kyoto Protocol national counterparts
Cap or floor (baseline) 1990 Greenhouse Gas emissions /-
Regulated entity (buyer) Utilities others
Supplying entity (seller) Clean energy, efficiency, sequestration
Distribution of allowance Free distribution to capped sectors, moving towards auctions
Service area Global
Unit of trade One metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)
Trading platform European Union Environmental Trading System, for example
Enforcing agency Designated national agencies, international accord
Market shapers Secondary markets, futures, options, verifiers, appraisers, insurers
7Size of global carbon market
8Projected growth of carbon market
EU market projected to be dwarfed by U.S. market,
estimated to reach 1 trillion by 2020 Largest
distribution of property rights since settlement
of West!
9Regional state efforts proliferating
10 WCI at a glance
Timeline Launch January 1, 2012
Goal Reduce emissions 15 below 2005 levels by 2020
Size 1 billion tons when fully implemented (2040 billion)
Scope electricity sector, large stationary sources, fossil fuel producers, transportation (5080 of emissions)
Allocation 1025 minimum auction
Registry The Climate Registry
Compliance 3 years
Offsets Maximum of 49 of reductions shall come from offsets Preference for offsets generated within WCI Initial project types forestry (affor/refor forest management, avoided defor) livestock manure management methane soil carbon
11Role of forests in WCI
- Forests iconic, and carbon rich
- Limited opportunities for afforestation and
reforestation - All desire carbon to help forestry stay in
forests, but must solve leakage issues - Most relevant role is in forest management
projects enhancing carbon through changes such
as longer rotations. - Sweet spot is finding carbon project locations
that maximize delivery of co-benefits and
minimize opportunity costs steep slopes, for
example. - No guarantee of significant role for forest
carbon in regional and federal trading system
unless we find quality solutions together.
12Whats the deal with forest carbon?
- Forest carbon is very attractive
- Very important deforestation/forest degradation
responsible for 25 of global emissions (same as
US, worlds largest polluter). - Rich co-benefits
- Easy to understand the connection
- But also very challenging
- Baseline (sequestration/emissions that would have
occurred without carbon project may be hard to
determine) - Forests can burn or decline, leading to loss of
carbon (permanence) - Forest conservation/reduction in logging can just
shift activities elsewhere (leakage) - For these reasons, forest carbon very
controversial, but global importance of forest
carbon demands a resolution.
13Policy Rationale for Offsets
- Quality reductions IF DONE RIGHT, equally
effective in reducing atmospheric GHG levels as
on-site mitigation - Lower cost Offsets are only used if lower cost
- Lowers climate change mitigation cost to society
- More money for everything else
- Food, shelter, health, security, recreation
- Technology bridge Allows reductions now while
new low-carbon technology is developed
14Rationale against offsets
- Need to create pressure for reductions from
primary emitters - Need to fundamentally change our behavior, not
pay others to clean up our messes (especially
people with few economic options) - Offsets have quality issues
- Moral objection to creating license to pollute
15Case study Ecotrust Forests LLCCurrent status
- Raise capital into open, perpetual fund
(currently 30 million under management) - Acquire and manage forestland
- Manage forests for longer rotations, structural
complexity diversity - Generate competitive returns for investors
through full range of forest products and
services timber, non-timber, ecosystem services,
recreation - Make strategic acquisitions in high-conservation
value watersheds, and restore health and
productivity - Generate jobs and wealth for local residents
16Carbon Stockby Forest Type and Stand Age
Data from 2006 accounting guidelines, 1605(b)
program Graph by EcoFor 2006
17Long rotation forestry results in 2.5x more
standing volume
18Additional carbon value per acre on PNW westside
forests
19Ecosystem services are key
Source Binkley, Beebe, New von Hagen, 2006
20Ecotrust Forests carbon transaction
- Methodology under review by Voluntary Carbon
Standard - Sources of additional carbon above baseline
- extended rotations
- expanded riparian reserves
- carbon reserves on steep and unstable slopes
above salmon streams - Evaluating financial and tax implications of
carbon credit sales for different classes of
investors (exempt and non-exempt)
21Parting thoughts
- New conversation more than a zero sum game
- Market solutions demand more rigor in delivering
clear quantifiable benefits - Early ecosystem service markets messy and full of
drama, but that goes with the territory - Not a panacea, but a powerful and occasionally
wonderful new tool - Creation of new class of entrepreneurs is a
powerful co-benefit