Title: Rethinking Password Strategies Ravi Sandhu Chief Scientist sandhu@nsdsecurity.com 703 283 3484
1Rethinking Password StrategiesRavi SandhuChief
Scientistsandhu_at_nsdsecurity.com703 283 3484
2Outline
- Security doctrine for the 21st century
- Password vulnerabilities and countermeasures
- Available technologies
3Secure doctrine for the 21st century
- Good enough security
- Absolute security is not possible
- Too much security is counterproductive
- Too little security is not acceptable
- The goal is to find the sweet spot
- Security dollars must work smarter and harder
- Security threats are growing
- Security budgets are flat and expertise is
shrinking - Need more bang for the buck
- Prevent catastrophic failure and tolerate
sporadic isolated failures - Focus on preventing catastrophic failure
- Tolerate sporadic isolated failures
4The threat environment is getting worse
RISK
Claim The potential threat has gone up
hundredfold.
1990 1995 2000 2005
5Resources and expertise are not growing
Skilled resources to address the problems
Dollars devoted to problem
1990 1995 2000 2005
6Work smarter and harder
- Starting point
- Risks went up 100 fold
- Security dollars went up a little
- Skilled resources went down
- So what could happen?
- Option Your security budget goes up enormously
- Reality Security budget stays flat as of IT
budget. - The security dollars have to work smarter and
harder!
7Some thoughts on smarter...
- Proposition We waste dollars on non/small
problems (the 20/80 rule of security!) - Example Unnecessary encryption (40 bit vs. 128
bit SSL) - Explanation
- Security has many roots in the cold war era. The
communication link was the problem. In our world
the end points are a MUCH bigger problem. So why
do we waste so many dollars encrypting links
unlikely to be attacked? - Challenge spending on non-problems
8Some thoughts on smarter...
- Proposition We are vulnerable to peer pressure.
Sometimes our peers are just wrong. - Example Bank B has to deploy technology/policy X
because Bank A did so. And then Bank C, Bank D...
Soon weve spent scarce dollars on
technology/policy of doubtful value. (e.g.
password aging) - Explanation Its hard to buck a so-called best
practice in our business, even if the evidence
is lacking. - Challenge best practices
9Some thoughts on smarter...
- Proposition the vendor crypto-techno-geeks lead
us by the nose. - Example The entire PKI fiasco. How much did we
spend? What value have we seen? Who told the
crypto-geeks that they decide what sort of
digital signatures are legal? - Explanation Security is an obscure science where
you are trying to prove the negative. Its hard to
question the crypto-experts in their Ivory
Towers. - Challenge the geeks
10Some thoughts on smarter...
- Proposition Vendor business models drive our
infrastructure, as opposed to our needs. - Example Why do SSL certificates expire annually
causing us outages? Who determined that a
technology company can better manage a
certificate authority infrastructure than a
bank that secures tens of billions of dollars? - Explanation FUD (Fear-Uncertainty-Doubt)
- Challenge vendor business models
11Some thoughts on harder...
- Proposition Security products must address your
lack of skilled resources issue. - Example Many products need experts to set up
and run them. - Explanation Most products are designed by the
experts for the experts. They do not realize
that most products are run by non-experts with
little time to get trained on everything. - Ask Can a reasonably competent systems/network
person with little security experience run the
product?
12Some thoughts on harder...
- Proposition Security products must be
defensive - Example Many security products work great as
long as those operating them walk on water and
dont get their feet wet. - Explanation Designed by security geeks whove
never lived in a real operational world. - Ask Can an average person having a real bad day,
be woken at 2AM to fix an issue without opening
up a major hole inadvertently?
13Some thoughts on harder...
- Proposition Security products must address
fundamental problems, before the esoteric. - Example Weak passwords are a major critical
problem. Why spend money on esoteric new problems
before this is fixed? - Explanation The fundamental problems are often
not sexy. - Ask Before securing the attic window, we should
get a better lock on the front door!
14Some thoughts on harder...
- Proposition To get more from your security
dollars, a security product must solve multiple
problems. - Example One product for passwords, one for PKI,
one for 2-factor, one for signatures... (and
thats for the Internet, lets get even more for
wireless...) - Explanation Vendors address niches. Your
business sees the big picture. - Ask Can I reuse the product, for multiple
functions across multiple channels?
15Outline
- Security doctrine for the 21st century
- Password vulnerabilities and countermeasures
- Available technologies
16A Common Misperception
- Fact Password based systems are often vulnerable
to attacks - Myth Passwords are inherently insecure.
- Fact It is completely possible to design a
sufficiently secure password system. - Fact A sufficiently secure password system must
use some form of PKI under the covers - This is a mathematical theorem proved in 1998
Designing sufficiently secure password-based
systems is non-trivial but it is possible by
proper use of PKI under the covers.
17Another Common Misperception
- Fact Users hate current password systems that
require - too many passwords and
- force too many changes
- Myth Users inherently hate passwords.
- Fact It is completely possible to design a user
friendly password system with PKI beneath the
covers
Designing user-friendly and sufficiently secure
password-based systems is non-trivial but it is
possible by proper use of PKI under the covers.
18Yet Another Common Misperception
- Myth Security is increased by forcing users to
change their passwords frequently - Fact There is no empirical evidence to show this
and much anecdotal evidence to show the opposite - Changing passwords too frequently will degrade
security because of user reaction
A strong password-based system should not force
frequent password changes
19Password Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures
- End-user Vulnerabilities
- User education and awareness
- Technology can help mitigate some (but not all)
of these - Sniffing Attacks
- Everything on the wire should be encrypted
- Server Spoofing Attacks
- Need server authentication
- Guessing Attacks online
- Prevented by throttling
- Guessing Attacks offline (Dictionary attacks)
- Prevented by PKI encryption on the wire and
hardened password server on the backend
20End-user Vulnerabilities
- Poor password selection
- Users choose easy-to-guess passwords
- Countermeasure enforce complexity rules
- Passwords written down by users
- Infrequently used passwords are often written
down - Countermeasure reduce number of passwords a user
needs to remember - Password shoulder surfing
- Password exposed to observant bystander
- Countermeasure user awareness
- Password reuse across multiple servers
- Password becomes vulnerable at weak servers
- Countermeasure user awareness
21End-user Vulnerabilities
- Password sharing
- Users will share passwords with others only if
there is no personal risk - Countermeasure personal risk must be injected
into the system (perhaps by policy and procedure) - Password reset costs
- Users forget passwords
- Countermeasure automate password resets BUT be
careful not to reduce security too much - Undetected theft
- Users are not aware if their passwords are
compromised - Countermeasure detection technology and feedback
to the user
22Sniffing attacks
- Sniffing on the wire is easily prevented by
widely deployed technologies such as SSL and
IPSEC - No excuse for letting this happen anymore
- Sniffing on the desktop by malicious code
- Password exposure is limited to a single user
- Users need to be free of viruses, worms and
Trojan horses for all kinds of reasons - Windows 2000, Windows XP allow tighter control of
the desktop by the organization - Ultimately we need stronger platforms that reduce
the risk of malicious code
23Server-spoofing attacks
- To prevent server-spoofing we need server
authentication and user awareness - SSL with server-side certificates is a good
enough and widely deployed solution for this
problem - In future we can move to solutions where the
password is never communicated to the server - SSL enhanced with password-based client-side
certificates is the most promising technology - Need a footprint on the desktop
24Guessing Attacks online
- Attacker tries various passwords until he
succeeds - Slow down (throttle) the rate at which an
attacker can try different guesses - Many strategies are used in practice
- 3 strikes and lock the account for password reset
- 3 strikes and lock the account for some time
- Slowdown each successive guess
- Aggressive strategies can lead to denial of
service to legitimate users - Loss is limited to small number of passwords
25Guessing Attacks offline aka Dictionary Attack
- Attacker obtains encrypted password
- Attacker tries passwords from a dictionary of
commonly used passwords and compares with
encrypted password - Encrypted password is often salted to make this
harder - Various studies have shown that 25 to 50 of
passwords fall to this attack - This is catastrophic failure
- In the past these attacks would take months, with
current processor speeds they take hours or days
or even less - We are at the point where exhaustive search is
feasible so even a dictionary is not needed -
This is the single biggest vulnerability in most
existing password systems and it leads to
catastrophic failure
26Guessing Attacks offline aka Dictionary Attack
- How to prevent old approach
- Force user to select passwords that withstand
dictionary attack - Record shows that this is easier said than done
- Trend is that exhaustive search on entire space
of human-memorizable passwords is feasible - Password aging to force a change every 30 days or
so - Would need to age much faster than 30 days to
have any effect on feasibility of attack - Hide password files (e.g. shadow files)
- Old solution dating to when users had access to
system current end users usually dont have
access to system. - Meaningless against hackers and admin account
compromise - Harden password system OS
- Very hard to maintain in hardened manner.
- admin accounts tend to have carte-blanche
access. - Too many insider accounts.
27Guessing Attacks offline aka Dictionary Attack
- How to prevent modern approach
- Make password system OS very hard to penetrate.
- Use least privilege based partitioning to sharply
minimize or eliminate insider account attacks. - Use PKI technology to eliminate traditional
encrypted password file - Make it non-invasive to end-user (zero client
footprint, pure back-end solution). - Make it very easy to integrate with existing
systems (e.g. IBM WebSeal, Netegrity, LDAP,
Active Directory, etc.)
28Outline
- Security doctrine for the 21st century
- Password vulnerabilities and countermeasures
- Available technologies
29Support multiple security levels on a single
infrastructure
Two-factor PKI
Password plus USB token or variant
Roaming PKI
Password Usability PKI Security
Zero Footprint Hardened Password
No change for users No change for issuer No
password file (PKI hardened)
Weak Password Systems, Catastrophic Dictionary
attacks
302-Key RSA vs. 3-Key RSA Hardened Passwords
- 2-Key RSA
- Keys
- Alice Public e
- Alice Private d
- Alice Cert C
- Challenge/Response
- Challenge sent
- Response signed with d
- Verified with e and C
- Observation Guessing d from e is
extremely difficult.
- 3-Key RSA
- Keys
- Alice Public e
- Alice Private d
- Alice has D1PKCS5(password)
- Appliance has D2
- Alice Cert C
- Challenge/Response
- Challenge sent
- Response signed with D1
- Verified with D2, e and C
- Observation Guessing D1 from D2 is
extremely difficult.
31SIA Solution How it works