Title: OCHA's experience with pooled funds including CERF
1(No Transcript)
2Inputs ? process ? outputs ? outcomes ? impact
- 1. Spectrum of indicators implementation vs.
effects
implementation
effects
3Project-level reporting
Sectoral-level monitoring
Strategic monitoring
4Donors Managers
- 3. Audiences or users of ME information,
their distinct info needs
Accountability (post hoc)
Management info (real time)
(Both sides are interested in impact its part
of both accountability and management info. By
its nature, impact info is necessarily post hoc,
and usually cant be project-specific, or even
donor-specific its better measured at sectoral
level.)
5- Getting the right info to the right users at the
right time the intersections of the three axes
- SPECTRUM AND FOCAL LEVEL Measuring impact isnt
practical at project level better at sectoral.
Project reporting should be on outputs. - AUDIENCE AND SPECTRUM Managers need real-time
info, which consists mainly of implementation
indicators. Both donors and managers are
interested in impact, which is necessarily post
hoc. - AUDIENCE AND FOCAL LEVEL Do donors want
project-level reporting in CAPs? only in order
to organise the output information. Do they want
CAP-level strategic monitoring? definitely.
6- The ideal CAP ME scheme, per these intersections
- Output reporting to the cluster, in real time for
managerial purposes (hence to the HC via
clusters), with reference to targets expressed in
CAP projects. (Cluster lead TOR Ensure
adequate monitoring mechanisms are in place to
review impact of the sectoral working group and
progress against implementation plans.) - Sectoral-level impact reporting, necessarily post
hoc. - In Sudan and DRC, this kind of scheme started as
a CHF ME framework, and was then broadened into
overall CAP ME.
7ME system
HC HCT
Donors other stakeholders
Aggregated real-time output reporting
Sectoral-level impact analysis post hoc
Clusters
Project-level output reporting in real time
Implementing organisations
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)