Opposing Theories of Language Development in Humans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Opposing Theories of Language Development in Humans

Description:

Nativists Noam Chomsky. related to specific structures in brain. Can learn any language, anywhere. Only humans have it. Principles of language are innate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: leande6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Opposing Theories of Language Development in Humans


1
Opposing Theories of Language Development in
Humans
  • Behaviorists learned by imitation
  • Nativists Noam Chomsky
  • related to specific structures in brain.
  • Can learn any language, anywhere
  • Only humans have it
  • Principles of language are innate
  • Interactionist learn through social interaction
  • Social situations necessary to activate language
    acquisition device
  • Have to interact, not just hear it.
  • Parentese helps children learn grammar
    rules/vocabulary
  • Its a universal process related to maturation

2
Stages of Language Acquisition
Stage 1 Crying, cooing (1-5 months) Stage 2
6-18 months old begins babbling period of
universal adaptability. Stage 3 1 word stage
engage in fast mapping must be able to store and
retrieve memories learn to manipulate
enviroment. (12 18 months) Stage 4 2 word
stage Actions, modifying words, qualifying
words. (2 years) Stage 5 telegraphic speech
short sentences using nouns and verbs learn
conversational rules (2- 5 years) Stage 6
expresses concepts with words imaginary speech
uses complex grammar aware of other
languages.(4-5 years)
3
Does the language we speak determine the thoughts
we have? Or, does thought determine the language
spoken?
4
The Case for Linguistic Relativity
  • Whorf (1956)- Snow
  • Eskimos have numerous words for snow (wet/dry,
    blowing etc).
  • English has only one word.
  • Criticisms
  • Overestimated the number of words used by Eskimos
  • Ignored other English words for snow (blizzard,
    slush).

5
The Case Against Linguistic Relativity
  • Rosch (1973)
  • Danai people of New Guineu appear to only 2 terms
    for color (one for bright/one for dark)
  • English language has 11 basic color names
  • Both groups easily learn non-sense names for
    colors (shouldnt happen if linguistic relativity
    works)
  • Conclusion we think about color the same way
    even though we do not express it similarly.

6
Overall Conclusion
  • Most evidence does not support strong, linguistic
    relativity
  • Some evidence that a weaker version may exist.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com