Title: Are limnologists obsessed with P
1Are limnologists obsessed with P?
- Highest demandsupply ratio- 80,000
- O, H 1, Si 2000, C5000, N30,000
- Positive correlation between P and chlorophyll
- Schindlers ESA P-addition experiment
- Why is P so limiting?
- comes from rocks, not atmosphere, not very
soluble or volatile - Lost to sedimentation
- Biologically essential (ATP, DNA, RNA)
2Phosphorus and chlorophyll- observational
evidenceD.W. Schindler 1978 Limnology and
Oceanography 23478
3Observational evidence is inconclusiveSmith 2006
Limnology and Oceanography 51377
4Phosphate addition experiment, Experimental Lakes
Area, OntarioDavid Schindler 1977 Science 195
260
Ca
C
N
Se
Mg
P
Mo
Fe
Ca
C
N
Se
Mg
Mo
Fe
5Routes of non-point source pollution Carpenter et
al. 1998 Ecological Applications 8559
6P and O2
- Oxic sediments store 2X more P than anoxic ones
- positive feedback- eutrophication leads to
anoxia, more P recycling from sediments - Internal loading
7Recycling by consumers
- Zooplankton excrete 10 of body P per day
- If zooplankton have more P than phytoplankton,
can reduce P availability - Recycled P may be more important than new P
8Biological uses of PhosphorusElser et al.
Ecology Letters 3540
- RNA, DNA
- ATP
- Involved in growth, synthesis of new tissues
- Organisms with lots of P have high growth rates
9Agricultural eutrophication in the Okanagan
10The foul stench of Lake Mendota, Wisconsin
11Oligotrophic vs. eutrophic lakes of B.C.
Cultus Lake, Okanagan Valley Chlorophyll-a 1200
µg/L
Gwendoline Lake, UBC Research Forest Chlorophyll-a
5 µg/L
12Effects of eutrophication through P pollution
- increased primary productivity
- decreased light availability
- changes in O2 availability
- Increased fish production (unless anoxia occurs)
- decreased species diversity
13What about grazers? Elser et al. 2000 Nature
408 578
Pieris rapae
Daphnia magna
14Phytoplankton become less edible at high
productivity Watson, McCauley and Downing 1997
Limnology and Oceanography 42487
15P and cyanobacteria (N-fixers)Smith 1983 Science
221669
16What about Nitrogen?
- 2nd highest demandsupply ratio 30,000
- Used mainly for proteins
- Comes from atmosphere and land
- Comes in reduced (NH4), oxidized (NO3/NO2) and
inert (N2) forms
Burning fossil fuels puts NO2 into the
atmosphere, produces Acid Rain AND Nitrogen
Deposition (fertilization with nitrogen)
17Transformations between different forms of N-
microbes at work
Pseudomonas friends
Cyanobacteria
C6H12O6 4HNO3? 6CO2 10H2O 2N2
NH4 2O2?NO3- H2O 2H
picky phytoplankton prefer amonium
Nitrosomonas Nitrobacter
18N-transformations and O2
- Nitrification (NH4-gtNO3)- needs O2
- Denitrification (NO3-gtN2)- needs anoxia (mostly)
- N-fixation- needs anoxia
- heterocysts (cell walls in cyanobacteria)
19Nitrogen forms by depthin a eutrophic lake
Nitrification (NH4 -gt NO3)
N-fixation (N2-gt NH4)
Denitrification (NO3 -gt NO2 -gt N2)
20Humans are responsible for 50 of global
N-fixation(from fossil fuels and
fertilizers)Vitousek et al. 1997 277494
Humans have increased biologically-available N
and P by 100 and 400, respectively Falkowski
et al. 2000 Science 290 291
21What determines N-loading?
- Erosion (deforestation)
- Atmospheric deposition (rain)
What happens to N once deposited?
- retained (soils, sediments)
- runoff to the ocean
22Hubbard Brook experimentLikens et al. 1970
Ecological Monographs 40 23
23Nitrogen is increasing due to N-deposition from
atmosphereeven in pristine Lake Superior
Spring nitrate concentration in Lake Superior
(ugN/L)
24Atmospheric Nitrogen deposition is concentrated
near industrial activity
25Effects of N-deposition in Sweden shift to P
limitationBergström et al. 2005 Limnology and
Oceanography 50 987
26Is P-limitation of primary productivity a recent
phenomenon?Were Schindlers lakes historically
N-limited, but N-deposition flipped them to
P-limitation?
27Comparison between N and P
28What about other limiting nutrients?
- Si
- especially for diatoms
- Fe
- a big deal in the ocean
- limiting in some lakes
29Whats the big deal about nutrient limitation?
- Effects on competitive dominance, diversity
- maximal when species are most different
- Effects on trophic efficiency
- maximal when species are most similar
- Multiple vs. single limitation
- homeostasis vs. flexibility
30Ecological Stoichiometry
- The chemical formula for a human
H400O100C90N6Ca2P1S0.2Na0.2K0.2Cl0.1Mg0.04Si0.04Fe
0.03Zn0.02Cu0.08Mn0.013F0.013Cr0.007Se0.004Mo0.003
Co0.001 - Feeding is a chemical reaction
- Consumer Food ? More consumer waste
- H3C3O1 3H1C5O5 ? 2 H3C3O1 12C 14O
- Animals are not molecules, not always homeostatic
(have the same formula) - Wastes can be recycled
31Animals are more homeostatic than plants
NP ratio in algae
NP ratio in food (dissolved nutrients)
P in Daphnia
P in food (algae)
32The Redfield Ratio
- C106N16P1
- Very constant in marine phytoplankton, more
variable in lakes - Why? Is there something magical about these
numbers? - What about terrestrial plants?
33Is Redfield really a constant?
34Phytoplankton are more nutritious than
terrestrial plants (eat your algae)Elser et al.
2000 Nature 408 578
35Zooplankton and insects have more N and P than
their food Elser et al. 2000 Nature 408 578
36Do limiting nutrients vary between
ecosystems?Elser, Bracken, Cleland, Gruner,
Harpole, Hillebrand, Ngai, Seabloom, Shurin,
Smith 2007. Ecology Letters 10 1135
wild Jim Elser
Phosphorus is much more important as a
limiting nutrient in aquatic systems (than
terrestrial) -Wikipedia (Eutrophication)
37Do limiting nutrients vary between
ecosystems?Elser, Bracken, Cleland, Gruner,
Harpole, Hillebrand, Ngai, Seabloom, Shurin,
Smith 2007. Ecology Letters 10 1135
- Meta-analysis of 1,069 N and P field addition
experiments - 653 freshwater
- 243 marine
- 173 terrestrial
Phosphorus is much more important as a
limiting nutrient in aquatic systems (than
terrestrial -Wikipedia (Eutrophication)
38N and P are equally important in terrestrial and
freshwater ecosystems
N is more important in the ocean
39N and P limitation vary by habitat within
ecosystems
40How far can multiple limitation go?Harpole and
Tilman 2007 Nature 446791
41Does this work in lakes?Interlandi and Kilham
2001 Ecology 821270
Measured phytoplankton diversity and resource
availability (N, P, Si, light) over two years in
three lakes
42Phytoplankton diversity is highest in Yellowstone
Lakes when more resources are limitingInterlandi
and Kilham 2001 Ecology 821270
43How flexible is plant chemistry?
44What about light as a resource?
- Fertilization with light
- happens when mixing layer is shallow
- Increases C-fixation, photosynthesis
- Too much of a good thing?
45What does light do to phytoplankton?Urabe and
Sterner 1996 PNAS 938465
algal biomass
PC
100
10
Lab experiment
46High light lakes have high CP phytoplanktonStern
er et al. 1997 American Naturalist 150663
47What determines light level?
mixing depth (m)
All in the epilimnion Means lots of low quality
algae
mixing depth (m)
48Depth distribution of C, N and P in
algaeMatthews and Mazumder 2006 Ecology 872800
49What happens to trophic efficiency when we add
nutrients vs. light?Dickman et al. 2008 PNAS
50What happens to trophic efficiency when we add
nutrients vs. light?Dickman et al. 2008 PNAS
51The lesson
- adding light increases primary production, but
algae are low quality, zooplankton cant keep up - adding nutrients makes zooplankton yummier for
fish, fish grow more and control zooplankton - How does fish abundance change with light and
nutrient availability?
52Nutrients limit production, but most lakes have
very low nutrientsKarlsson et al. 2009 Nature
53More fish in clearer lakes (low DOC) with lots of
lightKarlsson et al. Nature 2009
54Why is that? Answer benthic production goes up
with light Karlsson et al. Nature 2009
Benthic/pelagic production
55The point about light
- mixing depth determines light in the epilimnion
- Algal food quality (CN, CP) decreases with
light - BUT primary and secondary production can increase
with light - High light means more benthic production -gt more
fish