Title: CardioVascular Risk Prevention by the Internists
1Cardio-Vascular Risk Prevention by the
Internists
- Prof. Benoit Boland
- Internal Medicine
- St-Luc University Hospital
- UCL-Brussels
- boland_at_mint.ucl.ac.be
2This patient comes to my medical office Im
addressing his/her CV Risk ?
- No. Why ?
- Yes. Why ? How ?
- 8 clinical cases
38 clinical cases, reason for (first) visit to
the internist
- F 37, cholesterol 280 (gyn PAME)
- M 52, rhumatoïd arthritis (MI 2003)
- M 54, familial HBPressure
- F 51, fatigue
- M 48, chronic LBPain (obesity)
- F 55, hypoglycaemic prescription
- M 38, check-up
- M 42, stressed (father IM age 63)
4Objectives of the Workshop to present
provide you with
- A strategy for CV Risk assessment, suited to the
outpatient care setting (fast, valid, easy) - A global CV risk management approach
- A discussion on drugs for CV protection
5Cardio-Vascular (CV) Prevention
- CV Attacks heavy burden
- frequent (1st mortality cause)
- early (25 of MI in men lt 55 years)
- silent (75 of MI Â out of a blue sky)
- High Risk priority
- frequent (15), severe, detectable, treatable
(EBM) - target patient group (60 of all first MI)
- Mission GPs Internists
- systematic  case-findingÂ
6High CV Risk definitions
- probability of a major acute ischaemic event
within 10 years reaches - 20 coronary, fatal or not
- ( Framingham )
- or
- 5 coro-cerebro, only fatal
- ( Score )
7CVP approach in 2 steps
- ASSESS CV Risk in all patients 30-75 years
( 1min ) - SCREEN 8 clinical RF (brochure p 2)
- CLASSIFY in clinical risk groups (brochure p 3-4)
- Risk Tables (Framingham or Score)
(brochure p 5-6 ) - EXPLAIN CV TREATMENT
- EXPLAIN the main therapeutic targets, according
to CV risk level (brochure p 7-8) - ADVISE of a visit to the GP, who should define
implement an individualized CV prevention program
8step 1.a Screen for 8 CV RF
- Systematic screening (adults aged 30-75 yrs)
- during the visit to the Internist
- Clinical A B C D E F G H
- A ge B MI (fat) C igarette
- D yslipidemia E vén. CV F amilial CV
- G lucose/t2DM H ypertension
- (Blood tests not needed at this step)
9RF definition, clinical (not biological)
- A Age at risk ( gt 50 years)
- B BMI (gt 30 kg/m² and/or Waist gt 102 88
cm) - C Cigarette ( gt 1 cigarette / day)
- D Dyslipidaemia (known lipid abnormality)
- E Event (ischaemic CV event)
- F Familial (CV event lt55/65 yrs, 1 degree
relative) - G Glucose gt 126 or known type 2 diabetes
- H Hypertension (traited or sBPgt140 or dBPgt90
mmHg)
10step 1.b Classify in CV risk groups 4 groups
(colours) according to  ABCDEFGHÂ
Frequency in GP
- C isolated (Cigarette only) gt smoking related
risk - Stop smoking key message 8
- E or/and G gt obvious high CV risk
- Need of intensive, long-term management 18
- Other(s) RF (A,B,D,F,H) gt undetermined CV risk
- lipid results risk table 52
- (-) for all RF gt obvious low CV risk
- OK healthy life-style 22
11Use of a Risk Table ?
- Inappropriate in obvious High Risk patients !
- E (vent) G (lycaemia gt 126)
- HFHz (LDL-C gt 240) HTA III (gt 180/110 mmHg)
- Useless in obvious Low risk and in Smoking
only patients - Needed in patients at Undetermined risk
- Lipids Total Cholesterol HDL-C) ( Tg
glycaemia if fasting) - Risk Table 10 year risk Framingham Score
Risk level - Red ? 20 ? 5 High
- Orange 10-19 2-4 Moderate
- Green lt 10 0-1 Low
- (NB  increased risk when F, HDL-C lt 40,
Tg gt150, )
12 Risk Tables comparison Framingham Score
- 1960-1980
- US East Coast
- City (5.000)
- Coronary only
- Morbi Mortality
- 5 age groups
- HRcoro ? 20 at 10 yrs
- Tables for diabetics yes
- 5 RF (A/S,C,D,H)
- 1980-2000
- Europe
- populations (200.000)
- Cardio-vascular
- only Mortality
- 6 age groups
- HRdeath ? 5 at 10 yrs
- tables for diabetics no
- 5 RF (A/S,C,D,H)
13Score Belgium
- Belgian Populations (BIRNH, MONICA, Bel-stress)
- Primary Prevention
- Methods
- CV Mortality at 10 yrs mean RF prevalence RR
(Europe !) - Specific features
- 5 1 (gt 68 yrs) age groups 4x4 cell squares
- risk (numbers) in each cell
- CV MORTALITY at 10 years
- Risk levels / colours
- Green Low 0 - 1
- Orange Moderate 2 - 4
- Red High 5 - 9
- Black very High gt 10
14CV Risk levels (GP) in 3231 patients
- Smoking related risk 8
- Â see your GP to quit smokingÂ
- High CV risk (E, G, or Table) 24
- Â see your GP to work on your main risk
factors  - Moderate CV risk 17
- Â see your GP to improve your life-styleÂ
- Low CV risk 37
- Â keep a healthy life-styleÂ
- 14
152. Explain the therapeutic targets
- Â each step toward a target is beneficialÂ
- Low CV risk  keep healthy life-styleÂ
- Smoking related risk  stop smokingÂ
- Moderate CV risk 6 validated targets
- 0 smoking normal Weight (BMIlt25)
- Diet, mediterranean normal sBP (lt 140 mmHg)
- Activity, physical normal dBP (lt90 mmHg)
- High CV risk 12 validated targets
16High CV Risk(CV event, t2 diabetes,
multifactorial) 12 therapeutic targets (EBM
level)
III cas/control study IV experts opinion
I RCTrial(s) a multiple/MA b single
II prospective cohort(s)
0 D A . P C A
0 M E - P C A
- 0 smoking (II a)
- D iet, mediterrean (I b)
- A ctivity, physical (II b)
- P latelets (aspirin, ...) (I a)
- C holesterol (statins, ...) (I a)
- A rterial wall (IEC, BBl) (I b)
- HbA1c lt 7 (for Db2) (II a)
- Total Chol. lt 190 mg/dl (IV)
- LDL-Chol. lt 115 mg/dl (IV)
- systol BP. lt 130 mmHg (IV)
- diastol BP. lt 85 mmHg (IV)
- BMIndex lt 25 Kg/m² (IV)
17CV Risk Algorithm
- Avantages
- Global approach, easy
- EBM
- Close to recommandations
- Tested and validated
- Acta Cardiologica 200459598
- Adopted by GPs
- GP consensus (Cfçaise 2003)
- ABV-RBP for GPs (WvvH 2006)
- Limits
- Need of training
- MD initiative
- Change of medical practice
- No treatment advice
188 clinical casesreason for (first) visit to the
internist
- F 37, cholesterol 280 (gyn PAME)
- M 52, rhumatoïd arthritis (MI 2003)
- M 54, HBPressure
- F 51, fatigue
- M 48, chronic LBPain (obesity)
- F 55, hypoglycaemic prescription
- M 38, check-up
- M 42, prevention (IM father)
19Case 1. F 37, dyslipidaemia (CT 280)
- RF screening gt
- A- B- C- D E- F- G- H- (126 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- Â one other RFÂ undetermined risk (grey)
- Risk table Lipid profile ?
- Yes TC 290 HDL-C 73 ratio 4.0
- CV risk level ?
- Risk Low (green) Fr lt 5 Sc 0
- CV treatments ?
20Case 2. M 52, RArthritis (MI 2003)
- RF screening gt
- A B- C- D- E F- G- H- (132 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- obvious High risk (red)
- Risk table ?
- No !
- Lipid profile ?
- (CT 235 HDL 45 ratio 5.2 TG 150 LDL ? )
- CV treatments ?
21Case 3. M 54, hypertension
- RF screening gt
- A B- C D E- F- G- H (138 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- undetermined risk (grey) probably ?
- Risk table Lipid profile ?
- Yes CT 240 HDL 42 ratio 5.7
- CV risk level ?
- Risk High (red) Fr gt20 Sc 7
- Risk 1 year after stop smoking ?
- CV treatments ?
22Case 4. F 51, fatigue
- RF screening gt
- A B- C- D- E- F- G- H- (136 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- undetermined risk (grey )
- Risk table Lipid profile ?
- Yes CT 225 HDL 50 ratio 4.5
- CV risk level ?
- Risk Low (green) Fr lt 5 Sc 1
- CV treatments ?
23Case 5. M 48, low back pain (BMI)
- RF screening gt
- A B C- D- E- F G- H (152 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- undetermined risk (grey)
- Risk table Lipid profile ?
- Yes CT 240 HDL 45 ratio 5.3
- CV risk level ?
- Risk Moderate (orange) Fr 10-15 Sc 2
- CV treatments ?
24Case 6. F 55, type 2 diabetes
- RF screening gt
- A B- C- D- E- F- G H (146 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- obvious High Risk (red)
- Risk table ?
- No !
- Blood tests ?
- HbA1c 7.8 creatinin 1.2 mg/dl
- (CT 230 HDL 40 ratio 5.7 TG 200 LDL ?)
- CV treatments ?
25Case 7. M 38, first check-up
- RF screening gt
- A- B- C- D- E- F- G- H- (138 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- obvious Low Risk (green)
- Risk table Lipid profile ?
- No
- CV risk level ?
- Risk Low (green)
- CV treatments ?
26Case 8. M 42, stressed (paternal MI)
- RF screening gt
- A- B C- D- E- F G- H- (138 mmHg)
- Clinical Classification ?
- undetermined risk (grey)
- Risk table Lipid profile ?
- Yes TC 264 HDL 42 ratio 6.3
- CV risk level ?
- Risk green Fr lt 5 Sc 1
- CV treatments ?
27 Take Home Tools
- 8 CV RF ?
- A B C D E F G H
- 4 groups typologies of clinical risk ?
- obvious Red grey Brown obvious Green
- grey become Red, Orange or Green
- Ranking of medical Priorities ?
- Red gt Brown gt Orange
- Main targets in High Risk patients
0 D A . P C A