CardioVascular Risk Prevention by the Internists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

CardioVascular Risk Prevention by the Internists

Description:

... Hospital. UCL-Brussels. boland_at_mint.ucl.ac.be. SBMI, ... US East Coast. City (5.000) Coronary only. Morbi Mortality. 5 age groups. HRcoro: 20% at 10 yrs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: cprv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CardioVascular Risk Prevention by the Internists


1
Cardio-Vascular Risk Prevention by the
Internists
  • Prof. Benoit Boland
  • Internal Medicine
  • St-Luc University Hospital
  • UCL-Brussels
  • boland_at_mint.ucl.ac.be

2
This patient comes to my medical office Im
addressing his/her CV Risk ?
  • No. Why ?
  • Yes. Why ? How ?
  • 8 clinical cases

3
8 clinical cases, reason for (first) visit to
the internist
  • F 37, cholesterol 280 (gyn PAME)
  • M 52, rhumatoïd arthritis (MI 2003)
  • M 54, familial HBPressure
  • F 51, fatigue
  • M 48, chronic LBPain (obesity)
  • F 55, hypoglycaemic prescription
  • M 38, check-up
  • M 42, stressed (father IM age 63)

4
Objectives of the Workshop to present
provide you with
  • A strategy for CV Risk assessment, suited to the
    outpatient care setting (fast, valid, easy)
  • A global CV risk management approach
  • A discussion on drugs for CV protection

5
Cardio-Vascular (CV) Prevention
  • CV Attacks heavy burden
  • frequent (1st mortality cause)
  • early (25 of MI in men lt 55 years)
  • silent (75 of MI  out of a blue sky)
  • High Risk priority
  • frequent (15), severe, detectable, treatable
    (EBM)
  • target patient group (60 of all first MI)
  • Mission GPs Internists
  • systematic  case-finding 

6
High CV Risk definitions
  • probability of a major acute ischaemic event
    within 10 years reaches
  • 20 coronary, fatal or not
  • ( Framingham )
  • or
  • 5 coro-cerebro, only fatal
  • ( Score )

7
CVP approach in 2 steps
  • ASSESS CV Risk in all patients 30-75 years
    ( 1min )
  • SCREEN 8 clinical RF (brochure p 2)
  • CLASSIFY in clinical risk groups (brochure p 3-4)
  • Risk Tables (Framingham or Score)
    (brochure p 5-6 )
  • EXPLAIN CV TREATMENT
  • EXPLAIN the main therapeutic targets, according
    to CV risk level (brochure p 7-8)
  • ADVISE of a visit to the GP, who should define
    implement an individualized CV prevention program

8
step 1.a Screen for 8 CV RF
  • Systematic screening (adults aged 30-75 yrs)
  • during the visit to the Internist
  • Clinical A B C D E F G H
  • A ge B MI (fat) C igarette
  • D yslipidemia E vén. CV F amilial CV
  • G lucose/t2DM H ypertension
  • (Blood tests not needed at this step)

9
RF definition, clinical (not biological)
  • A Age at risk ( gt 50 years)
  • B BMI (gt 30 kg/m² and/or Waist gt 102 88
    cm)
  • C Cigarette ( gt 1 cigarette / day)
  • D Dyslipidaemia (known lipid abnormality)
  • E Event (ischaemic CV event)
  • F Familial (CV event lt55/65 yrs, 1 degree
    relative)
  • G Glucose gt 126 or known type 2 diabetes
  • H Hypertension (traited or sBPgt140 or dBPgt90
    mmHg)

10
step 1.b Classify in CV risk groups 4 groups
(colours) according to  ABCDEFGH 
Frequency in GP
  • C isolated (Cigarette only) gt smoking related
    risk
  • Stop smoking key message 8
  • E or/and G gt obvious high CV risk
  • Need of intensive, long-term management 18
  • Other(s) RF (A,B,D,F,H) gt undetermined CV risk
  • lipid results risk table 52
  • (-) for all RF gt obvious low CV risk
  • OK healthy life-style 22

11
Use of a Risk Table ?
  • Inappropriate in obvious High Risk patients !
  • E (vent) G (lycaemia gt 126)
  • HFHz (LDL-C gt 240) HTA III (gt 180/110 mmHg)
  • Useless in obvious Low risk and in Smoking
    only patients
  • Needed in patients at Undetermined risk
  • Lipids Total Cholesterol HDL-C) ( Tg
    glycaemia if fasting)
  • Risk Table 10 year risk Framingham Score
    Risk level
  • Red ? 20 ? 5 High
  • Orange 10-19 2-4 Moderate
  • Green lt 10 0-1 Low
  • (NB  increased risk  when F, HDL-C lt 40,
    Tg gt150, )

12
Risk Tables comparison Framingham Score
  • 1960-1980
  • US East Coast
  • City (5.000)
  • Coronary only
  • Morbi Mortality
  • 5 age groups
  • HRcoro ? 20 at 10 yrs
  • Tables for diabetics yes
  • 5 RF (A/S,C,D,H)
  • 1980-2000
  • Europe
  • populations (200.000)
  • Cardio-vascular
  • only Mortality
  • 6 age groups
  • HRdeath ? 5 at 10 yrs
  • tables for diabetics no
  • 5 RF (A/S,C,D,H)

13
Score Belgium
  • Belgian Populations (BIRNH, MONICA, Bel-stress)
  • Primary Prevention
  • Methods
  • CV Mortality at 10 yrs mean RF prevalence RR
    (Europe !)
  • Specific features
  • 5 1 (gt 68 yrs) age groups 4x4 cell squares
  • risk (numbers) in each cell
  • CV MORTALITY at 10 years
  • Risk levels / colours
  • Green Low 0 - 1
  • Orange Moderate 2 - 4
  • Red High 5 - 9
  • Black very High gt 10

14
CV Risk levels (GP) in 3231 patients
  • Smoking related risk 8
  •  see your GP to quit smoking 
  • High CV risk (E, G, or Table) 24
  •  see your GP to work on your main risk
    factors  
  • Moderate CV risk 17
  •  see your GP to improve your life-style 
  • Low CV risk 37
  •  keep a healthy life-style 
  • 14

15
2. Explain the therapeutic targets
  •  each step toward a target is beneficial 
  • Low CV risk  keep healthy life-style 
  • Smoking related risk  stop smoking 
  • Moderate CV risk 6 validated targets
  • 0 smoking normal Weight (BMIlt25)
  • Diet, mediterranean normal sBP (lt 140 mmHg)
  • Activity, physical normal dBP (lt90 mmHg)
  • High CV risk 12 validated targets

16
High CV Risk(CV event, t2 diabetes,
multifactorial) 12 therapeutic targets (EBM
level)
III cas/control study IV experts opinion
I RCTrial(s) a multiple/MA b single
II prospective cohort(s)
0 D A . P C A
0 M E - P C A
  • 0 smoking (II a)
  • D iet, mediterrean (I b)
  • A ctivity, physical (II b)
  • P latelets (aspirin, ...) (I a)
  • C holesterol (statins, ...) (I a)
  • A rterial wall (IEC, BBl) (I b)
  • HbA1c lt 7 (for Db2) (II a)
  • Total Chol. lt 190 mg/dl (IV)
  • LDL-Chol. lt 115 mg/dl (IV)
  • systol BP. lt 130 mmHg (IV)
  • diastol BP. lt 85 mmHg (IV)
  • BMIndex lt 25 Kg/m² (IV)

17
CV Risk Algorithm
  • Avantages
  • Global approach, easy
  • EBM
  • Close to recommandations
  • Tested and validated
  • Acta Cardiologica 200459598
  • Adopted by GPs
  • GP consensus (Cfçaise 2003)
  • ABV-RBP for GPs (WvvH 2006)
  • Limits
  • Need of training
  • MD initiative
  • Change of medical practice
  • No treatment advice

18
8 clinical casesreason for (first) visit to the
internist
  • F 37, cholesterol 280 (gyn PAME)
  • M 52, rhumatoïd arthritis (MI 2003)
  • M 54, HBPressure
  • F 51, fatigue
  • M 48, chronic LBPain (obesity)
  • F 55, hypoglycaemic prescription
  • M 38, check-up
  • M 42, prevention (IM father)

19
Case 1. F 37, dyslipidaemia (CT 280)
  • RF screening gt
  • A- B- C- D E- F- G- H- (126 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  •   one other RF  undetermined risk (grey)
  • Risk table Lipid profile ?
  • Yes TC 290 HDL-C 73 ratio 4.0
  • CV risk level ?
  • Risk Low (green) Fr lt 5 Sc 0
  • CV treatments ?

20
Case 2. M 52, RArthritis (MI 2003)
  • RF screening gt
  • A B- C- D- E F- G- H- (132 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  • obvious High risk (red)
  • Risk table ?
  • No !
  • Lipid profile ?
  • (CT 235 HDL 45 ratio 5.2 TG 150 LDL ? )
  • CV treatments ?

21
Case 3. M 54, hypertension
  • RF screening gt
  • A B- C D E- F- G- H (138 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  • undetermined risk (grey) probably ?
  • Risk table Lipid profile ?
  • Yes CT 240 HDL 42 ratio 5.7
  • CV risk level ?
  • Risk High (red) Fr gt20 Sc 7
  • Risk 1 year after stop smoking ?
  • CV treatments ?

22
Case 4. F 51, fatigue
  • RF screening gt
  • A B- C- D- E- F- G- H- (136 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  • undetermined risk (grey )
  • Risk table Lipid profile ?
  • Yes CT 225 HDL 50 ratio 4.5
  • CV risk level ?
  • Risk Low (green) Fr lt 5 Sc 1
  • CV treatments ?

23
Case 5. M 48, low back pain (BMI)
  • RF screening gt
  • A B C- D- E- F G- H (152 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  • undetermined risk (grey)
  • Risk table Lipid profile ?
  • Yes CT 240 HDL 45 ratio 5.3
  • CV risk level ?
  • Risk Moderate (orange) Fr 10-15 Sc 2
  • CV treatments ?

24
Case 6. F 55, type 2 diabetes
  • RF screening gt
  • A B- C- D- E- F- G H (146 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  • obvious High Risk (red)
  • Risk table ?
  • No !
  • Blood tests ?
  • HbA1c 7.8 creatinin 1.2 mg/dl
  • (CT 230 HDL 40 ratio 5.7 TG 200 LDL ?)
  • CV treatments ?

25
Case 7. M 38, first check-up
  • RF screening gt
  • A- B- C- D- E- F- G- H- (138 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  • obvious Low Risk (green)
  • Risk table Lipid profile ?
  • No
  • CV risk level ?
  • Risk Low (green)
  • CV treatments ?

26
Case 8. M 42, stressed (paternal MI)
  • RF screening gt
  • A- B C- D- E- F G- H- (138 mmHg)
  • Clinical Classification ?
  • undetermined risk (grey)
  • Risk table Lipid profile ?
  • Yes TC 264 HDL 42 ratio 6.3
  • CV risk level ?
  • Risk green Fr lt 5 Sc 1
  • CV treatments ?

27
Take Home Tools
  • 8 CV RF ?
  • A B C D E F G H
  • 4 groups typologies of clinical risk ?
  • obvious Red grey Brown obvious Green
  • grey become Red, Orange or Green
  • Ranking of medical Priorities ?
  • Red gt Brown gt Orange
  • Main targets in High Risk patients

0 D A . P C A
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com