Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled t - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled t

Description:

Can nurse practitioner (NSP) be an alternative to junior doctor in managing minor injury in ER? ... This study shows that nurse practitioners can provide a safe ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Leon226
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled t


1
Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse
practitioners or junior doctors a randomised
controlled trial
  • M Sakr, J Angus, J perrin, C Nixon, J Nicholl, J
    Wardrope
  • The Lancet vol 354 October 16, 1999

91-08-17 ??? ???
2
Question
  • Can nurse practitioner (NSP) be an alternative to
    junior doctor in managing minor injury in ER?

3
Objective
  • To assess the care and outcome of patients with
    minor injuries who were managed by a nurse
    practitioner (NSP) or a junior doctor (JD) in ER

4
Inclusion criteria
  • Patient visited ER with 6-month period and during
    study session
  • Patient with minor trauma, with informed consent
  • Only injury that was treatable by NSP
  • Not previously assessed by GP

5
Criteria of assessment
  • Adequacy of care
  • Satisfaction of care reported by patient via
    questionnaires
  • Work rate and cost

6
Adequacy of Care
  • Compared clinical assessment of NSP and JD with
    research registrar
  • Criteria included
  • Clinical examination
  • Request for radiography
  • Treatment decision
  • Advice
  • Follow up
  • Reviewed by ER consultants 3 month later

7
Questionnaires
  • At ER
  • Satisfaction of care
  • Courtesy
  • Care facilities
  • 28 days later
  • Need unplanned F/U ?
  • Recovery and capacity for work, leisure, daily
    living
  • Overall satisfaction of care received

8
Work Rate and Cost
  • Direct observation of time taken by JD and NSP to
    take history, examine the patient, interpret the
    radiographs, and record their findings for 100
    patient
  • Cost for staff and training course

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Adequacy of Care
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Patient Satisfaction
15
Satisfaction At ER
  • 831 patients completed questionnaires at ER
  • 11 reported poor or very poor
  • 3/387(0.8) in NSP group
  • 8/415 (1.9) in JD group
  • P0.04

16
Outcome at 28 Days
17
(No Transcript)
18
Work Rate and Cost
  • JD
  • 48 patients
  • 9.02 (SD 4) min
  • Salary Cost
  • 14.91/hr
  • NSP
  • 46 patients
  • 10.89 (SD 4.6) min
  • Salary Cost
  • 12.18/hr on weekday
  • 15.81/hr on Sat night
  • 19.44/hr on Sunday
  • 1370 850 for 3 wks training

19
Discussions
  • Assessed long term outcome of pt care by NSP
  • No increased frequency of request for
    radiography by NSP
  • Same accuracy of radiography interpretation by
    NSP and JD
  • NSP provided better care as indicated by less
    unplanned F/U

20
Discussions (2)
  • Despite higher cost in NSP training, NSP is
    permanent staff but JD rotates every 6 month and
    require same training
  • This study shows that nurse practitioners can
    provide a safe alternative to junior doctors for
    the care of patients with minor injuries.

21
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com