Common Deficiencies Encountered During Inspections and Possible Solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Common Deficiencies Encountered During Inspections and Possible Solutions

Description:

Therapy administration. Donor selection, evaluation and management. Donor ... Patient records - min 10 years after admin and as according to governmental laws' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: ebmt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Common Deficiencies Encountered During Inspections and Possible Solutions


1
Common Deficiencies Encountered During
Inspections and Possible Solutions
  • Derwood Pamphilon
  • Chair JACIE Accreditation Committee

2
The FACT-JACIE Standards 3rd ed 2006







3
Documentation
  • Submitted before inspection
  • Organigramme of programme
  • CVs, registration, evidence of training,
    educational activity for all senior medical staff
  • Nursing summary (staffing, training etc)
  • Quality manual and SOP for SOP
  • List of SOPs
  • Patient and donor consent forms
  • List of patients (Activity data)
  • MED-A data for 10 consecutive patients
  • INSPECTION CHECKLIST
  • Documentation to see on site
  • Patient notes
  • Sample donor notes
  • Selected SOPs (e.g. donor evaluation)
  • Proformas for HDT
  • Training records
  • Audit reports
  • Adverse Event (AE) reports
  • Minutes of meetings
  • Quality review meetings
  • Patient management meetings

4
The Inspection Checklist
5


Areas of deficiencies Expressed as of total
deficiencies. Based on analysis of 632
deficiencies encountered in inspections



6
Section D Deficiencies
7
Trends in Deficiencies
8
Procedure for Collection Facility Inspection
Procedure
File
Kits/solutions
Crash calls
Labels
9
General Points
  • Talk to junior staff members
  • Talk through an ongoing procedure and review
    associated documentation
  • Look at records of collections for procedures
    listed by clinical facility
  • Ask to see training logs and records
  • Look at the room(s) for donor evaluation
  • Look at the stores

10
Quality ManagementPlan (QMP)
  • Programme Director responsible for QMP
  • Organisational chart of key personnel and
    functions
  • Include - policies, procedures and 3rd party
    agreements
  • Defined process improvement plan
  • Personnel requirements

11
Quality ManagementPlan (QMP)
  • Documentation and review of products and outcomes
    e.g. engraftment
  • Conduct of audits
  • System for - errors, accidents, adverse events
    and complaints
  • Mechanism for document control

12
Quality ManagementPlan (QMP)
  • Process for product tracking
  • Validation of equipment, reagents and processes
  • Inventory control
  • Ensure products meet predefined release
    specifications e.g. good safety, viability and
    integrity
  • Microbiology testing in approved labs

13
QMP - Joint Clinical Programmes
SOLUTIONS
  • DEFICIENCIES
  • Lack of overall Quality Manager
  • for joint programme
  • 2 sets of SOPs and policies
  • Lack of integrated audits and adverse event
    reporting/review

X
14
B4.000 Clinical Programme
DEFICIENCY There is no review of clinical
outcome
SOLUTION
Actions to be taken if deviation
Define parameters What is acceptable?
  • Review of TRM, line
  • infections
  • Audits
  • Adverse events

PD must review
15
Problems with Clinical Units
16
Assessment of Training and Ongoing Competency
17
C4.000 Quality ManagementPeripheral Blood
SOLUTIONS
  • DEFICIENCIES
  • Collection outcomes e.g. yields and AEs not
    regularly reviewed by CF Director
  • The QMP does not describe the validation of
    significant apheresis procedures
  • The SOP does not give the range of expected
    outcomes/results

18
B5.000 Clinical - SOPs
SOLUTIONS
  • DEFICIENCIES
  • Lack of SOPs e.g. for chemo, neutropenic fever
  • No review dates
  • No logical system of numbering
  • Document control poor
  • Not present in appropriate locations

Centre must submit proposal for development of a
comprehensive QMP
RESOURCE!!
19
C5.000 CollectionPolicies and Procedures
  • DEFICIENCIES
  • No SOP for donor screening, consent, training, BM
    collection, storage or transport
  • Range of expected results, ranges and end points
    not defined in SOP for stem cell collection
  • No examples or worksheets and labels
  • No arrangements for annual review
  • Tolerance limits and corrective actions for
    collection not defined

SOLUTION
Revised Documentation
20
C5.000 Collection Policies and Procedures
  • Lack of proper communication from clinical to
    collection team
  • SOP present but inadequate e.g. no acceptable
    results and tolerance limits / no instruction for
    action if these are not met
  • No procedure for recording deviation from the
    SOPs relating to stem cell collection, or whether
    and how such deviations are approved

21
SOP IllustrationBM Harvest
22
B6.000 C6.000 Donors
  • Appropriate consent (risks/benefits, tests,
    rights to review tests/refuse donation,
    alternatives), available to CF staff prior to
    procedure
  • Proper assessment procedures
  • Use of donors not meeting the safety criteria
  • Protect recipient from disease transmission
  • - Tests for HIV, HTLV, HBV, HCV, syphilis
  • - d-30 for HPC d-7 for TC

23
B6.000 Donors - Problems
  • DEFICIENCIES
  • Lack of written donor information
  • e.g. collection procedures and risks of
    G-CSF, central lines
  • Missing/inconsistent donor info e.g. travel,
    transfusion, immunisation histories
  • Lack of clear selection criteria
  • No clear final authorisation
  • Not relaying donor info to collection facility
  • No record in patient record of donor suitability
    e.g. HLA, CMV, ABO
  • SOLUTIONS
  • Clear, comprehensive and unambiguous policies and
    procedures
  • Checklists
  • Final approval documents

Resources
24
C6.000 Donor Selection Management
  • No written orders for collection
  • Absence of written consent
  • No arrangements for assessment of (interim) donor
    suitability
  • No formal policy / SOP for assessment of venous
    line placement
  • Assessment of venous line placement not
    documented in patient/donor record

25
Format of Documents
26
Format of Documents
27
C7.000 D7.000 - Labelling
  • Labels - held upon receipt/printed on demand
    reviewed against a copy or template
  • Obsolete labels destroyed
  • Archive representative labels for 10 years
  • Biohazard labels - risk factors or marker
    positive
  • Label Table will defined whether information
    should be affixed (AF), attached (AT) or
    accompanying documents (AC)

28
Labels Storage
C7.000 C8.000
SOLUTION
  • DEFICIENCIES
  • Responsibility for label production and
    control unclear - new SOP
  • Lack of unique alphanumeric identifier
  • Must give proper name e.g. Human HPC-A
  • CF and PL need to agree HPC identifiers

29
C7.000 C8.000 Labels Storage
  • PROBLEMS
  • Example labels not appended to SOP
  • SOP to include Biohazard label
  • Pre- or demand -printed labels
  • Human HPC-A
  • Name volume of AC / additives not stated

SOLUTION
Biohazard
30
C7.000 - Biohazards
  • Biohazard label if screening indicates
  • - presence of a communicable disease
  • - risk factor /clinical signs of one
  • Creates 3 categories of product labelling
  • - warning tests reactive for..
  • - warning advise patient of
    communicable disease risk
  • - not evaluated for infectious
    disease risk

31
(No Transcript)
32
C9.000 - Records
  • Facility records relating to QC etc - 10 years
  • Patient records - min 10 years after admin and
    as according to governmental laws
  • Research records - min 10 years after admin
  • Where divided must show extent of each facilitys
    responsibility

33
C9.000 Records
  • Facilities for patient record storage
  • inadequate
  • No records for ... personnel training
  • No copy of collection record
  • (safety, purity) sent to Clinical Unit

34
Interactions Between Facilities
  • Collection facility must use processing
    facilities that meet JACIE standards
  • Bone marrow collection normally integral to
    clinical programme but must be inspected and
    accredited as a collection facility
  • Apheresis collection and processing facilities
    may be integral to programme, or external, e.g.
    National Transfusion Service

35
Interactions Between Facilities
  • Links between facilities are important e.g.
  • Written requests for collection, or component
    issue
  • Provision of engraftment data to collection and
    processing facilities
  • Reporting of AEs to other facilities, if
    appropriate
  • Service agreements or contracts with external
    facilities

36
A View of One Centre
The collection facility is run to a high
standard by the blood service. The interface
requires more formal organisation especially for
reporting of AE and variances in practice. The
was a lack of awareness that the facility was
functioning as part of the overall
transplant programme. Inspector
Communication between the facility and the
clinical programme needs more formal
organisation. AEs are reported within the Blood
Service but no SOP for reporting to the Clinical
Programme, quality manager or patients
physician. JACIE Medical Director
37
The Solution
  • Establish a new Quality Forum - regular meeting
    between all parts of the programme
    - regular review of AE, outcome
    of audits etc
  • New SOPs address the relationship
  • Collection and Processing Facilities at Blood
    Service meet monthly to review outcome data and
    report AE, incidents etc to Clinical Programme

38
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com