Performance indicators of an institution of higher education By Dr' Mrs' Sunanda Chande SVT College - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Performance indicators of an institution of higher education By Dr' Mrs' Sunanda Chande SVT College

Description:

Reveal a number of aspects of the student experience at higher education institutions ... prospective students, employees, accreditation councils and government. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:143
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Cha172
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance indicators of an institution of higher education By Dr' Mrs' Sunanda Chande SVT College


1
Performance indicators of an institution of
higher educationByDr. Mrs. Sunanda ChandeSVT
College of Home-Science (Autonomous), SNDT
Womens university, Mumbai, India
  • For
  • The First International Conference on Assessing
    Quality in Higher Education 2006
  • 11-13 December 2006

2
(No Transcript)
3
Degree offered- B.HSc. Post graduate diploma-
Clinical nutrition dietiticsMany short- term
certificate coursesDepartmentsCommunication
ExtensionComposite home-ScienceFamily Resource
Management Foods NutritionHuman
DevelopmentTextiles Clothing
4
A sense of contest and challenge has
increased in the field of education.
  • Availability of resources and profitability of
    educational institutions has increased
  • This has led to healthy competition and healthy
    competition results in better performance
  • Providers of education, world over have realized
    the need to monitor performance
  • Performance is reality
  • Assessment of performance through indicators is
    an actuality

5
Purposes of performance indicators
  • Provide reliable information on nature and
    performance of institutes
  • Reveal a number of aspects of the student
    experience at higher education institutions
  • Allow comparisons between institutions wherever
    appropriate
  • Enable institutions to benchmark their own
    performance
  • Inform policy developments
  • Contribute to the public accountability of higher
    education
  • Add to the information that prospective local and
    international students, their parents, school
    counselors can use to choose institution for
    enrollment
  • Illustrate diversity of higher education
  • Contribute to public accountability of a large
    element of a large element of Government funds
    and assist the future development of higher
    education policies

6
What are performance indicators?They are a range
of statistical and non-statistical indicators
that offer an objective measure of how a higher
education institute is performing.
  • Types of performance indicators
  • 1.Quantitative ( statistical/objective)
  • 2.Narrative ( subjective)
  • 3.Combination of quantitative and narrative.

7
Quantitative student enrollment, drop out rate,
success rate in exams, student-teacher ratio etc.
  • Narrative change in attitude behaviour,
    capacity building, developing values, user
    satisfaction.
  • Combination descriptive data is quantified,
    complicated as the statements or descriptions are
    graded and then quantified. This is illustrated
    through a case-study by NAAC

8
Case Study of NAAC
  • When NAAC evaluates performance of an
    institution, there are 7 criteria and indicators
    for each criteria. The assessed institute submits
    description/information for each criteria which
    is assessed by the team of experts and scores are
    given for each criteria.
  • Criteria with indicators are as follows
  • Curricular aspect
  • Indicators Goal orientation, curriculum
    development, programme option, academic
    flexibility and feed-back.
  • Teaching-Learning and evaluation
  • Indicators Admission process, catering to
    diverse needs, teacher quality, examination
    reforms etc.
  • Research, consultancy and extension
  • Indicators Research publication output,
    linkages etc.

9
4. Infrastructure and learning resourcesIndicator
s Physical facilities, library, computers etc.
  • 5. Student support and progression
  • Indicators Student profile, support,
    activities etc.
  • 6. Organization and management
  • Indicators Goal orientation and decision
    making, performance appraisal, organizational
    structure etc
  • 7. Healthy practices Total quality management,
    value based education, social responsibility and
    citizenship roles, overall development.
  • Thus the indicator-wise scores are calculated for
    each criteria. Each criteria has a certain
    weightage. Composite scores for institution is
    calculated after adding the criteria-wise scores
    a grade is given as shown in Tables 1 2

10
Criterion-wise scores
11
Grading system
12
Who are they for?They are for universities,
colleges, funding bodies, prospective students,
employees, accreditation councils and government.
  • Characteristics and performance indicators
  • Students student satisfaction, feed-back,
    extracurricular activities etc.
  • Staff qualifications, participation in academic
    activities, peer-relations, staff-authority
    relations, number of supporting staff.
  • Institutional indicators infrastructure
    facilities, staff-student ratio, support
    systems, social environment, outreach programmes
    etc.
  • Research indicators research done, papers
    published, collaboration with industry for
    research.
  • Higher education outcome indicators
    employability of students, professions pursued,
    job profile of the graduates.
  • Syllabus indicators subjects offered according
    to changing needs, flexibility, choice of
    subjects.
  • Finance indicators grants received from govt and
    other funding bodies, resources generated though
    consultancy, hobby courses.

13
A study was done to know perceptions of the
teachers from SVT College about performance
indicators of higher education institutes.
Twenty eight teachers from the college responded.
The data is presented according to the
characteristics.
14
  • Teacher Indicators

15
  • Institution Indicators

16
(No Transcript)
17
  • The study reveals
  • Respondents gave maximum importance to
    category of student indicators, institution
    indicators and teacher indicators.
  • maximum number of teachers felt that
    infrastructure, quality of teachers and well
    designed curriculum were important indicators.
  • In conclusion knowledge about types,
    purposes and characteristics of performance
    indicators enables you to analyze institutional
    performance objectively.
  • Shared perception perception of all the
    stakeholders gives the direction to progress and
    development.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com