Essentials of Economics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

Essentials of Economics

Description:

... treatment, building on an editorial report by the Economist magazine in 2005. ... The Economist reports some opinions on both sides. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: rogerasht9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Essentials of Economics


1
Essentials of Economics
  • Business 502

2
Profit Maximization 1
  • Assumptions
  • Price is given -- determined by the market.
  • The businessperson has control only over the
    quantity produced.
  • (Baumol and Blinder skip over this).
  • Therefore, the objective is to adjust output to
    give max profits under those assumptions

3
Profit Maximization 2
p MC
4
Adjustment
  • Suppose that price is less than Marginal cost.
    Then cutting output by one unit will cut cost
    more than it will cut revenues, increasing
    profits.
  • Suppose that price is greater than Marginal cost.
    Then adding one more unit of output will increase
    revenues more than costs, increasing profits.

5
(No Transcript)
6
Another Equimarginal Principle
  • The marginal cost curve is the supply curve.
  • (We will see that this is true whenever quantity
    supplied is positive).
  • An industry can be defined as a group of all
    firms that sell a particular, differentiated
    product.
  • For a group of firms in a particular industry,
    the supply curve is the horizontal sum of their
    supply curves, which is the industrys marginal
    cost curve.
  • Here is the qualification

7
Supply Curve
  • Implication The supply curve for an individual
    firm is the firms marginal cost curve (if it
    produces any output at all).

8
The Shut-Down Point 1
  • As long as the firm produces something, it will
    maximize its profits by producing "on the
    marginal cost curve." But it might produce
    nothing at all.
  • When will the firm shut down?
  • The answer goes a bit against common sense. The
    firm will shut down if it cannot cover its
    variable costs.
  • So long as it can cover the variable costs, it
    will continue to produce.
  • As long as it can pay the variable costs and
    still have something to apply toward the fixed
    costs, it is better off continuing to produce.

9
The Shut-Down Point 2
  • This is an application of the opportunity cost
    principle. Just because fixed costs are fixed,
    they are not opportunity costs in the short run
    -- so they are not relevant to the decision to
    shut down.
  • It is important not to confuse shut-down with
    bankruptcy. They are two different things. If a
    company cannot pay its interest and debt payments
    (usually fixed costs), then it is bankrupt. But
    that doesn't mean it will shut down. Bankrupt
    firms are often reorganized under new ownership,
    and continue to produce -- just because they can
    cover their variable costs, and so the new owners
    do better to continue producing than to shut
    down.

10
Firm Supply
  • We can now refine the definition of the firms
    supply curve
  • The supply curve is the marginal cost curve above
    the average variable cost curve.
  • This application may illustrate the importance of
    the cost curve analysis last week.

11
Monopoly
  • In economics we define a monopoly is a firm that
    is the only seller of a product with no close
    substitutes.
  • Whenever a firm has some power to influence its
    price, we say that it has monopoly power.
  • However, many firms that are by no means
    monopolies have some influence over their prices.
  • (Baumol and Blinder focus on this case.)

12
Monopoly Demand
The demand curve for the monopoly is the demand
curve for the industry -- since the monopoly
controls the output of the entire industry -- and
the industry demand curve is downward sloping,
That means the monopoly can push the price up by
limiting output. If the monopoly cuts back on its
output, it can move up the industry demand curve
to a higher price. In general, a firm with
influence over its price will have a downward
sloping demand curve, even if it is not the
industry demand curve.
13
Monopoly Pricing
  • Because it has no competition, a monopoly can
    control its selling price (within the limits of
    demand).
  • We will assume that the monopoly charges only one
    price -- no price discrimination.
  • What price? To answer this question we need two
    concepts
  • Marginal revenue
  • Marginal cost
  • We proceed to marginal revenue.

14
Marginal Revenue
Revenue, R price times quantity sold.
We can interpret marginal revenue as
(approximately) the increase in total revenue as
a result of selling one more unit of output.
15
Marginal Revenue Example
Suppose output increases from 10000 to 11000 and
revenue increases from 754286 to 714286. Then
16
Marginal Revenue and Demand
17
Example 1
  • Simplifying assumptions
  • The industry demand curve is linear.
  • Cost is the sum of a fixed overhead cost and a
    variable or unit cost proportional to output,
    i.e.
  • CabQ20,00040Q
  • (per day)

18
Example 2
  • CabQ20,00040Q
  • Implies

19
Example 3
Marginal Cost
Clearly the monopolist will price above marginal
cost. By how much?
20
Example 4
Clearly, the monopoly can increase its profits by
reducing output and pushing the price up. But how
far? If the price were to go up to 100, sales and
profits would be zero. The key to answering this
question is to balance Marginal Cost and
Marginal Revenue.
21
Adjustment
  • Suppose that Marginal Revenue is less than
    Marginal cost. Then cutting output by one unit
    will cut cost more than it will cut revenues,
    increasing profits.
  • Suppose that Marginal Revenue is greater than
    Marginal cost. Then adding one more unit of
    output will increase revenues more than costs,
    increasing profits.

22
Maximum Profits 1
Unit cost
23
Maximum Profits 2
We see that a price of 70 and an output of 10,500
just balances the advantages of cutting output
against the disadvantages. This is where Marginal
Revenue (not price) equals the Marginal Cost.
24
Monopoly is Inefficient 1
  • The red triangle is a loss of consumers surplus
    with no offsetting benefit.

25
Monopoly is Inefficient 2
  • After monopolization, the net benefits from
    widget production have two components the profit
    rectangle plus the upper (green) consumers'
    surplus triangle.
  • But the opportunity cost of monopolization is the
    consumers' surplus the consumers would have
    enjoyed if they had continued to buy at 40 --
    the sum of the three areas.
  • Thus, the benefits of monopolization are less
    than the costs, and the difference -- the excess
    cost -- is measured by the area of the (red)
    triangle to the right.

26
A More Complex Example
27
Interim Conclusion on Monopoly
  • Within limits, a monopoly can increase its
    profits by cutting its output.
  • The limit is MRMC
  • A simplifying assumption here is that the
    monopoly charges the same price for every unit.
  • This is the rationale for antitrust laws.
  • But we are ignoring another important monopoly
    effect price discrimination.

28
Price and Revenue for a Firm
  • In economics we define a monopoly as a firm
    that is the only seller of a product with no
    close substitutes.
  • Whenever a firm has some power to influence its
    price, we say that it has monopoly power.
  • However, many firms that are by no means
    monopolies have some influence over their prices.

29
Back to Elasticity
Any firm that can influence its price by
restricting its output has to take its Marginal
Revenue into account. There is a useful
relationship between MR and elasticity. It is
called the Lerner rule, after socialist economist
Abba Lerner.
30
Markup
Thus we can derive the profit-maximizing markup
as (Youll have to trust me on this -- it
takes a bit of calculus to fill in the details.)
31
Example 1
32
(No Transcript)
33
Working Problem Continued
Tentative commitments from various stadiums and
statistical analysis lead to the estimated demand
relation we just saw What is their elasticity?
How will their sales influence their revenues?
34
Example 2
35
Example 3
To maximize profits, MRMC and MC 6
Recall,
We have
36
Example 4
  • So their price should be 3618 per bumbershoot.
  • At that price, the demand curve tells us they
    will sell 10,895 umbrellas
  • For total revenue of 196,110
  • Cost is 93,370
  • Profit is 100,740.

37
Another Example
  • Heres another example.
  • Cost depends on output and a capacity limit.
  • The elasticity of demand is constant at 2.
  • Lets apply the MR/MC/elasticity approach to find
    the profit maximum.

38
Cost
39
Elasticity and MR
  • Remember --

40
Demand
41
Cost and Revenue
Looks like and
42
Exact Computation
43
Supply Curve
  • We see that a firm with pricing power does not,
    strictly, have a supply curve.
  • Rather there is a single quantity supplied and
    price -- a supply point.
  • However -- provided we know that the elasticity
    of demand is constant, we can define something a
    little like a supply curve, using the Lerner
    rule.

44
Markup Rule
45
Further Application of Consumers Surplus Concepts
  • Concepts of consumers surplus -- and similar
    concepts of producers surplus -- can be applied
    to estimate the losses from unwise government
    policy. Marginal cost will also play a role.
  • One of my favorite examples (I have mentioned it
    before) is farm subsidies.
  • Here is a more detailed treatment, building on an
    editorial report by the Economist magazine in
    2005.

46
Farm Subsidies
  • A subsidy is a payment from the government to a
    private sector agent, without quid pro quo.
  • Payments to farmers in proportion to their
    production are one example.
  • As the Economist points out, these have been
    controversial because they interfere with
    international trade.

47
Are Subsidies a Problem?
  • They seem to be politically popular.
  • The Economist reports some opinions on both
    sides.
  • No doubt, there are some cases in which subsidies
    can be good things.
  • However, when we dig deeper, the case for farm
    subsidies in particular seems very weak.

48
The Economics of Subsidy
Source Farnham, Economics for Managers
49
Remember the Reasoning
50
With a Subsidy
51
With a Subsidy
52
Effect on LDC
53
In Addition
  • Funds must be raised (via taxes) to pay for the
    subsidy (or the interest on the deficit it
    generates).
  • Taxes have their own net loss triangle, the
    excess burden.
  • Still more resources are wasted in the political
    competition for subsidies rent seeking
    behavior.
  • In all, the case against subsidies as
    misallocation of resources is a strong one.

54
Not the Whole Story
  • Of course, supply-and-demand isnt the whole
    story.
  • Distributional issues can outweigh resource
    allocation
  • Environmental problems and imperfect competition
    may influence the allocation of resources away
    from the efficient market equilibrium.

55
However --
  • Distribution -- subsidies seem to favor (richer)
    developed country farmers and city folks over
    (poorer) LDC rural people.
  • There is no evidence that subsidies improve
    environmental outcomes or monopoly power.
  • Therefore -- it seems right that subsidies should
    be eliminated.

56
Overall Conclusion
  • A more detailed study of the form and basis of
    the determinants of demand and supply gives us
  • Tools that can help us understand changes in the
    economy, such as the decline of agriculture
  • Tools that can help us measure the impacts of
    some of those changes, such as introduction of
    new goods or government subsidies,
  • Tools that can help us to focus on the
    profit-maximizing price decision for a realistic
    business firm.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com