L3 Tracking Studies at Imperial - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

L3 Tracking Studies at Imperial

Description:

Tracker Analysis Method ... Define matches by shared clusters and track parameter comparison. ... Original analysis code used clusters assigned by CFT tracker ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: raymondbe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: L3 Tracking Studies at Imperial


1
L3 Tracking Studies at Imperial
  • R. Beuselinck
  • 26 March 2003

2
Outline
  • CFT tracker developments
  • Tracker comparison analysis
  • Method
  • Problems
  • Definitions
  • Results
  • Efficiency, purity
  • timing

3
CFT Tracker Developments
  • Ongoing work to improve CFT tracker
  • Timescale 2 weeks for new release
  • Goals
  • Improve axial tracking efficiency purity
  • Speed up the code
  • Comparison with current CFT code and Global
    Tracker (CFT only)

4
ttbar current CFT code
5
ttbar updated CFT
6
current CFT code green tracks have large chisquare
7
2nd event current code
8
2nd event updated code
9
Tracker Analysis Method
  • Compare tracking tool output to MC or real data
    tracks by cluster matching.
  • Define matches by shared clusters and track
    parameter comparison.
  • Use standard L3TTracker interface.
  • Can run as an additional package in tsim_l3.

Original code by Chris Barnes, modified by Tim
Scanlon
10
Problems encountered
  • Want to define matching by shared clusters
  • Existing MC files dont keep assignment of
    clusters to MC tracks
  • Existing trackers keep cluster assignment
    differently (not part of L3TTracker interface)
  • Match by cluster proximity instead.
  • Timing results lose overflow information

11
Definitions cluster matching
  • Clusters are assigned to MC tracks and L3 tracks
    by proximity
  • Stereo clusters must be within 2cm in Z
  • Axial clusters within 0.2/Rlayer in phi
  • Original analysis code used clusters assigned by
    CFT tracker
  • Results are almost identical to proximity
    assignment method.

12
Definitions track matching
  • Which MC track is best match to L3 track ?
  • The one with the most shared clusters
  • Symmetric definition for reverse match
  • For real data offline reco tracks are treated as
    MC tracks for analysis of L3 trackers.

13
MC Track categories
  • Findable MC track
  • Pt gt 1.0GeV/c, eta lt 1.6,
  • dca lt 1.0cm, Z0 lt 1m
  • At least 8 CFT clusters matched to track
  • Missed MC track
  • No assigned cluster matches any L3 track

14
L3 track categories
  • Good L3 track
  • Matches at least 8 clusters to one MC track
  • Track parameter difference chisquare lt400
  • Found track
  • Matches at least 1 cluster to an MC track but
    fails one of preceding cuts
  • Fake track
  • Anything else

15
Relationship of track categories
MC
good
fake
missed
L3
found
16
Definitions efficiency, purity
  • Efficiency found / findable
  • Good efficiency good / findable
  • Purity good / (found fake)
  • good / L3 tracks

17
ttbar Global Tracker (CFT only)
18
ttbar Original CFT code
19
ttbar updated CFT code
20
ttbar original CFT code
21
ttbar updated CFT code
22
ttbar Global Tracker (CFT only mode)
23
QCD Original CFT code
24
QCD Updated CFT code
25
QCD Global Tracker (CFT only mode)
26
Real Data Original CFT code
27
Real Data Updated CFT code
28
Real Data Global Tracker (CFT only mode)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com